Handbook of Politics pp 637-651 | Cite as

# Time Series Analysis of Political Change

This chapter considers the use of time-series analysis in the study of politics. Time-series analysis, as traditionally understood, requires a moderate number of observations on a single unit at approximately equal intervals. Data of this kind are rarely available at the individual level, so this chapter will focus on the macro level. Quantitative analysis of individual change is usually based on panels rather than time series (see Hsiao 1986 for a comprehensive discussion). Examples of time series relevant to the study of politics include election results, the number of protests, ratings of governments in terms of various qualities, and averages of individual opinions as measured by surveys. The chapter will focus on dependent variables that can be treated as at least approximately continuous, although it will give some attention to issues involving small counts. The analysis of single events calls for different techniques, which are discussed in Chap. 32.

## Keywords

Ordinary Little Square Time Series Analysis Structural Break Path Dependence Generalize Little Square## References

- Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, James A. Robinson, and Pierre Yared. 2007. “Reevaluating the Modernization Hypothesis.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 13334. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
- Akaike, Hirotugu. 1973. “Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle.” Pp. 267–81 in
*Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory*, edited by B. N. Petrov and F. Caski. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.Google Scholar - Almon, Shirley. 1965. “The Distributed Lag Between Capital Appropriations and Expenditures.”
*Econometrica*33: 178–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Andrews, Donald W. K. 1993. “Tests for Parameter Instability and Structural Change with Unknown Change Point.”
*Econometrica*61: 821–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Arrow, Kenneth J. 1960. “Decision Theory and the Choice of a Level of Significance for the t-Test.” Pp. 70–78 in
*Contributions to Probability and Statistics*, edited by Ingram Olkin. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar - Barro, Robert J. and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2004.
*Economic Growth*(second edition). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar - Berger, James O. and Thomas Sellke. 1987. “Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: the Irreconcilability of P-values and Evidence.”
*Journal of the American StatisticalAssociation*82: 112–22.Google Scholar - Berk, Richard A., Bruce Western, and Richard E. Weiss. 1995. “Statistical Inference for Apparent Populations.” Sociological Methodology 25: 421–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Box, G. E. P., and D. R. Cox. 1964. “An Analysis of Transformations.”
*Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B*26: 211–52.Google Scholar - Chow, Gregory C. 1960. “Tests of Equality Between Two Sets of Coefficients in Linear Regressions.”
*Econometrica*28: 591–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fair, Ray C. 1996. “Econometrics and Presidential Elections.”
*Journal of Economic Perspectives*10: 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hansen, Bruce E. 2001. “The New Econometrics of Structural Change: Dating Breaks in U. S. Labor Productivity.”
*Journal of Economic Perspectives*15: 117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hendry, David F. 1995. Dynamic Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoeting, Jennifer A., David Madigan, Adrian E. Raftery, and Chris Volinsky. 1999. “Bayesian Model Averaging: A Tutorial.”
*Statistical Science*14: 382–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hsiao, Cheng. 1986.
*Analysis of Panel Data*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - Hurvich, Clifford M. 1997. “Mean Square Over Degrees of Freedom: New Perspectives on a Model Selection Treasure.” Pp. 203–15 in
*The Practice of Data Analysis*, edited by D. R. Brillinger, L. T. Fernholz, and S. Morgen-thaler. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar - Inglehart, Ronald. 1997.
*Modernization and Postmodernization*. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar - — — and Wayne E. Baker. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.”
*American Sociological Review*65: 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kendall, Maurice and J. Keith Ord. 1990.
*Time Series,*(third edition). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960.
*Political Man.*Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar - Merton, Robert K. 1987. “Three Fragments from a Sociologist's Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials.”
*Annual Review of Sociology*13: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas, and Francisco O. Ramirez.1997 “World Society and the NationState.”
*American Journal of Sociology*103: 144–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Quandt, Richard E. 1960. “Tests of the Hypothesis That a Linear Regression Obeys Two Separate Regimes.”
*Journal of the American Statistical Association*55: 324–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schwartz, Gideon. 1978. “Estimating the Dimension of a Model.”
*Annals of Statistics*6: 461–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wood, B. Dan. 2000. “Weak Theories and Parameter Instability: Using Flexible Least Squares to Take Time Varying Relationships Seriously.”
*American Journal of Political Science*44: 603–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar