Space and Politics

  • Gregory Hooks
  • Linda Lobao
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Social scientists have long been concerned with power and politics and with the geographic settings in which social life occurs. But these two concerns have evolved rather separately. In sociology, economics, and political science deductive traditions of the twentieth century stressed the importance of producing generalizations that were context invariant. If geographic context was brought in to these disciplines, it was largely with respect to variations between nation and states. Of course, geography has long directed its spatial imagination across a range of contexts. However, adding a critical view of power and privilege occurred rather late in the last century (Harvey 1973).


Social Movement Political Process Spatial Context Welfare Reform Territorial Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Agnew, John. 1989. “The Devaluation of Place in Social Science.” Pp. 9–29 in John A. Agnew and James S. Duncan (eds), The Power of Place: Bringing Together Geographical and Sociological Imaginations. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  2. —— . 1994. “The Territorial trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory.” Review of International Political Economy 1: 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, John. 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrighi, Giovanni. 1994. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. —— . 2004. “Spatial and Other ‘Fixes’ of Historical Capitalism.” Journal of WorldQQQSystems Research 10: 527–539.Google Scholar
  6. Boli, John. 2001. “Sovereignty from a World Polity Perspective.” Pp. 53–82 in Problematic Sovereignty, edited by S. Krasner New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. —— . 1989. “Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory 7: 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brenner, Neil. 2001. “The Limits to Scale? Methodological Reflections on Scalar Structuration.” Progress in Human Geography 25: 591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. —— . 2004. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. New York: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brenner, Neil and Nik Theodore. 2002. “Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism.” Antipode 34(3): 349–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brenner, Neil, Bob Jessop, Martin Jones, and Gordon MacLeod. 2003. “Introduction: State Space in Question.” Pp. 1–26 in State/Space: A Reader, edited by N. Brenner, B. Jessop, M. Jones, and G. MacLeod London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castells, Manuel. 1996. “The Reconstitution of Meaning in the Space of Flows.” Pp. 493–498 in The City Reader, edited by Richard T. LeGates and Frederick Stout London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. ChaseQQQDunn, Christopher and Thomas Hall. 1997. Rise and Demise: Comparing WorldQQQSystems. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cliath, Alison and Gregory Hooks. 2008. “Organized Hypocrisy: The School of the Americas and State Violence in Latin America, 1955–2005.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Sociology, Washington State University.Google Scholar
  16. Clegg, Stewart R. 1989. Frameworks of Power. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Collins, Randall. 1978. “LongQQQTerm Social Change and the Territorial Power of States.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 1: 1–34.Google Scholar
  18. —— . 1981. “Does Modern Technology change the rules of Geopolitics?” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 9: 163–177.Google Scholar
  19. Cox, Kevin R. 1997. “Introduction: Globalization and Its Politics in Question.” Pp. 1–18 in Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, edited by Kevin R. Cox. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  20. —— . 2005. “Introduction: The Politics of Local and Regional Development.” Space and Polity 9(3): 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crump, Jeff R. 2002. “Contested Landscapes of Labor: Rival Unionism in the Farm Implements Industry.” Pp. 224–248 in Geographies of Power: Placing Scale, edited by Andrew Herod and Melissa W. Wright. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Del Casino, Vincent J. Jr., and John Paul Jones III. 2007. “Space for Social Inequality Researchers: A View from Geography.” Pp. 233–251 in The Sociology of Spatial Inequality, edited by Linda M. Lobao, Gregory Hooks, and Ann R. Tickamyer. Albany: The State University of New York.Google Scholar
  23. Dreier Peter, John Mollenkopf, and Todd Swanstrom. 2001. Place Matters: Metropolitics for the TwentyQQQFirst Century. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  24. Elazar, Daniel. 1994. The American Mosiac: The Impact of Space, Time, and Culture on American Politics. Westview: Boulder.Google Scholar
  25. Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103: 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. EspingQQQAndersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Frank, Thomas. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas? New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  28. Gaventa, John. 1980. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  29. Giddens, Anthony. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. —— . 1985. The Nation State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Goetz, Stephan and Hema Swaminathan. 2006. “WalQQQMart and CountyQQQWide Poverty.” Social Science Quarterly 87(2): 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldstone, Jack. 1991. Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Goodchild, Michael F. and Donald G. Janelle (eds). 2004. Spatially Integrated Social Science. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  34. Gotham, Kevin Fox. 2003. “Toward and Understanding of the Spatiality of Urban Poverty: The Urban Poor as Actors. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27: 723–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grant, Don and Wallace, Michael. 1994. “The Political Economy of Manufacturing Growth and Decline Across the American States, 1970–1985.” Social Forces 73: 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harvey, David. 1973. Social Justice and the City. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  37. —— . 1989. The Urban Experience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Haugh, Helen and Michael Kitson. 2007. “The Third Way and the Third Sector: New Labour's Economic Policy and the Social Economy.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 31: 073–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Herod, Andrew and Melisa W. Wright. 2002. “Introduction: Theorizing Scale.” Pp. 1–14 in Geographies of Power: Placing Scale, edited by Andrew Herod and Melissa W. Wright. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hicks, Alexander and Lane Kentworthy. 2003. “Varieties of Welfare Capitalism” SocioQQQEconomic Review 1: 27–61.Google Scholar
  41. Hobson, John and J.C. Sharman. 2005. “The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.” European Journal of International Relations 11: 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hooks, Gregory. 1994. “Regional Processes in the Hegemonic Nation: Political, Economic, and Military Influences in the Use of Space.” American Sociological Review 59: 746–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hooks, Gregory, Linda Lobao, Clay Mosher, and Thomas Rotolo. 2004. “The Prison Industry: Carceral Expansion and Employment in U.S. Counties, 1969–1994.” Social Science Quarterly 85: 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hooks, Gregory and James Rice. 2005. “War, Militarism and States: The Insights and Blind Spots of Political Sociology.” Pp. 566–586 in Handbook of Political Sociology, edited by Thomas Janoski, Alex Hicks, Robert Alford and Mildred Schwartz. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Hooks, Gregory and Chad Smith. 2004. “The Treadmill of Destruction: National Sacrifice Areas and Native Americans.” American Sociological Review 69: 558–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jenkins, J. Craig, Kevin T. Leicht, and Arthur Jaynes. 2006. “Do High Technology Policies Work? High Technology Industry Employment Growth in U.S. Metropolitan Areas, 1988–1998.” Social Forces 85: 267–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jessop, Bob. 2002. “Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State Theoretical Perspective.” Antipode 34: 452–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jones, Martin and Kevin Ward. 2002. “Excavating the Logic of British Urban Policy: Neoliberalism as Crisis Management.” Antipode 34: 473–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Krugman, Paul. 1991. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lauria, Mickey (ed). 1997. Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Leicht, Kevin T. and J. Craig Jenkins. 2007. “The State and Space in Political Sociology.” Pp. 63–84 in The Sociology of Spatial Inequality, edited by Linda M. Lobao, Gregory Hooks, and Ann R. Tickamyer. Albany: The State University of New York.Google Scholar
  53. Lobao, Linda M. 1993. “The Renewed Significance of Space in Social Research: Implications for Labor Market Studies.” Pp. 11–31 in Inequalities in Labor Market Areas, edited by Joachim Singelmann and Forrest. A. Deseren. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  54. —— . 2007. “The Local State, Decentralization, and Neoliberal RollQQQOut: A Comparative, Subnational Analysis of Growth and Redistribution Responses.” Research in Political Sociology 16: 85–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lobao, Linda M. and Gregory Hooks. 2003. “Public Employment, Welfare Transfers, and Economic WellQQQBeing Across Local Populations: Does Lean and Mean Government Benefit the Masses?” Social Forces 82: 519–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. —— . 2007. “Advancing the Sociology of Spatial Inequality: Spaces, Places, and the Subnational Scale.” Pp. 29–61 in The Sociology of Spatial Inequality, edited by Linda M. Lobao, Gregory Hooks, and Ann R. Tickamyer. Albany: The State University of New York.Google Scholar
  57. Lobao, Linda, Jamie Rulli, and Lawrence A. Brown. 1999. “A MacroQQQLevel Theory and LocalQQQLevel Inequality: Industrial Structure, Institutional Arrangements, and the Political Economy of Redistribution.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89(4): 571–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lobao, Linda M., Gregory Hooks, and Ann R. Tickamyer. 2007. “Introduction: Advancing the Sociology of Spatial Inequality.” Pp. 1–28 in The Sociology of Spatial Inequality, edited by Linda M. Lobao, Gregory Hooks, and Ann R. Tickamyer. Albany: The State University of New York.Google Scholar
  59. Logan, John and Harvey L. Molotch. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  60. Mann, Michael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power, Volume 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. —— . 1993. The Sources of Social Power, Volume II: The Rise of Classes and NationQQQStates, 1760–1914. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Markusen, Ann, Peter Hall, Scott Campbell, and Sabina Deitrick. 1991. The Rise of the Gunbelt: The Military Remapping of Industrial America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Marston, Sallie. 2000. “The Social Construction of Scale.” Progress in Human Geography 24: 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Marston, Sallie A., John Paul Jones III, and K. Woodward. 2005. “Human Geography without Scale.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30(4): 416–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Massey, Doreen. 1994. Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  66. McKee, Seth C. “Rural Voters in Presidential Elections, 1991–2004.” 2007. The Berkeley Electronic Press Forum 5(2): 1–25. http://www.bepress/forum/vol5/iss2/art2 Retrieved January 15, 2008.Google Scholar
  67. Miller, Byron. 2000. Geography and Social Movements: Comparing Antinuclear Activism in the Boston Area. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  68. Moffitt, Robert. 2005. “Remarks on the Analysis of Causal Relationships in Population Research.” Demography 42: 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mohr, John. 2005. “Implicit Terrains: Meaning, Measurement, and Spatial Metaphors in Organizational Theory.” In Constructing Industries and Markets, edited by J. Porac and M. Ventresca New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  70. Morrill, Richard. 1999. “Inequalities of Power, Costs, and Benefits across Geographic Scales: The Future Uses of the Hanford Reservation.” Political Geography 18: 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nielsen, Francois and Arthur S. Alderson. 1997. “The Kuznets Curve and the Great UQQQTurn: Income Inequality in U.S. Counties, 1970 to 1990.” American Sociological Review 62: 12–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. O'Connor, Julia, Ann Shola Orloff, and Sheila Shaver. 1999. States, Markets, and Families. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Oliver, J. Eric. 2001. Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Orfield, Myron. 1997. Metropolitics: A Regional Agenda for the Community and Stability. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  75. Partridge, Mark D. and Dan S. Rickman. 2006. The Geography of American Poverty: Is There a Need for PlaceQQQ Based Policies? Kalmazoo, MI: Upjohn.Google Scholar
  76. Peck, Jamie. 2001a. “Neoliberalizing States: Thin Policies/Hard Outcomes.” Progress in Human Geography 25: 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. —— . 2001b. WorkFare States. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  78. Pike, Andy, Andres RodriguezQQQPose, and John Tomaney. 2007. “What Kind of Local and Regional Development and for Whom?” Regional Studies 41: 1253–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Peck, Jamie and Adam Tickell. 2002. “NeoQQQliberalizing Space.” Antipode 34: 380–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ragin, Charles. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  81. Roberts, J. Timmons and Melissa ToffolonQQQWeiss. 2001. Chronicles from the Environmental Justice Frontline. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Roscigno, Vincent and William Danaher. 2004. The Voice of Southern Labor: Radio, Music, and Textile Strikes 1929–1934. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  83. Schram, Sanford F. 2006. Welfare Discipline: Discourse, Governance, and Globalization. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Sellers, Jeffrey. 2005. “(Re)placing the Nation: An Agenda for Urban Politics.” Urban Affairs Review 40: 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shaw, Martin. 2003. “The State of Globalization: Towards a Theory of State Transformation.” Pp. 117–130 in State/Space: A Reader, edited by Neil Brenner, Bob Jessop, Martin Jones, and Gordon MacLeod. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  86. Sklair, Leslie. 1999. “Competing Conceptions of Globalization.” Journal of WorldQQQSystems Research 2: 143–163.Google Scholar
  87. Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Smith, Neil. 2003. “Remaking Scale: Competition and Cooperation in PreQQQNational and PostQQQNational Europe.” Pp. 227–238 in State/Space: A Reader, edited by Neil Brenner, Bob Jessop, Martin Jones, and Gordon MacLeod. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  89. Soja, Edward. 1989. PostQQQModern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  90. Soule, Sarah A. and Yvonne Zylan. 1997. “Runaway Train? The Diffusion of StateQQQLevel Reform in ADC/AFDC Eligibility Requirements, 1950–1967.” American Journal of Sociology 103: 733–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sperling, John, Suzanne Helburn, Samuel George, John Morris, and Carl Hunt. 2004. The Great Divide: Retro vs. Metro America. Sausalito, CA: PoliPoint Press.Google Scholar
  92. Staeheli, Lynn A., Janet E. Kodras, Colin Flint (eds). 1997. State Devolution in America. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  93. Storper, Michael and Richard Walker. 1989. The Capitalist Imperative: Territory, Technology, and Industrial Growth. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  94. Sweeney, Stuart H. and Edward J. Feser. 2004. “Business Location and Spatial Externalities.” Pp. 239–262 in Spatially Integrated Social Science, edited by Michael F. Goodchild and Donald G. Janelle. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Tickamyer, Ann, Julie White, Barry Tadlock, and Debra Henderson. 2007. “The Spatial Politics of Public Policy: Devolution, Development, and Welfare Reform.” Pp. 113–139 in The Sociology of Spatial Inequality, edited by Linda Lobao, Gregory Hooks, and Ann Tickamyer. Albany: The State University of New York.Google Scholar
  96. Tilly, Charles. 1975. “Reflections on the History of European StateQQQMaking.” Pp. 3–83 in The Formation of National States in Western Europe, edited by Charles Tilly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  97. —— . 1990. Coercion, Capital and European States, A.D. 990–1990. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  98. —— . 1995. “To Explain Political Processes.” American Journal of Sociology 100: 1594–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. —— . 2001. “Mechanisms in Political Processes.” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tolnay, Stewart E., Glenn Deane, and E. M. Beck. 1996. “Vicarious Violence: Spatial Effects on Southern Lynchings, 1890–1919.” American Journal of Sociology 102(3): 788–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Urry, John. 2000. Sociology beyond Societies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  102. Warner, M. and A. Hefetz. 2002. “The uneven distribution of market solutions for public goods.” Journal of Urban Affairs 24: 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Weber, Max. 1946. Essays from Max Weber. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  104. —— . 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory Hooks
    • 1
  • Linda Lobao
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations