Synthesized Speech Used For The Evaluation Of Children’s Hearing And Speech Perception

  • M´ria Gósy
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)


This paper describes the auditory screening function of low redundancy synthesized Hungarian words. It has been applied successfully to hearing screening of normally developing children and children with learning disabilities. The same artificial words highlight the children’s speech perception disorders in the case of normal hearing. The basic hypothesis is applicable to many other languages as well.


specifically synthesized monosyllables hearing and speech perception test learning disabled children 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bamford, J. M., Wilson, I. M., Atkinson, D., & Bench, J. (1981). Pure tone audiograms from hearing-impaired children. II. Predicting speech-hearing from the audiogram. British Journal of Audiology, 15, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishara, L., Ben-David, J., Podoshin, L., Fradis, M., Teszler, C. B., Pratt, H., Shpack, T., Feiglin, H., Hafner, H,, & Herlinger, N. (1999). Correlations between audiogram and objective hearing tests in sensorineural hearing loss. International Tinnitus Journal, 5, 107–112.Google Scholar
  3. Block, M. G., & Wiley, T. L. (1994). Overview and basic principles of acoustic immittance measurements. In J. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of clinical audiology(pp. 271-283). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  4. Eggermont, J. J., Ponton, C. W., Coupland, S. G., & Winkelaar, R. (1991). Frequency dependent maturation of the cochlea and brainstem evoked potentials. Acta Otolaryngologica, 111, 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fletcher, H. (1929). Speech and hearing in communication. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  6. Fuess, R. V. L., Ferreire Bento, R., & Medicis da Silveira, A. A. (2002). Delay in audiotry pathway and its maturation of the relationship to language acquisition disorders. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, 4, 123–129.Google Scholar
  7. Gósy, M. (1992). Speech perception. Frankfurt: Hector.Google Scholar
  8. Gósy, M. (1997). Speech perception and comprehension of dysphasic children. In W. Ziegler and K. Deger, (Eds.), Clinical phonetics and linguistics(pp. 29-37). London: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Gósy, M. (2005). Pszicholingvisztika. [Psycholinguistics.] Buadepst: Osiris.Google Scholar
  10. Hazan, V., & Fourcin, A.J. (1983). Interactive synthetic speech tests in the assessment of the perceptive abilities of hearing impaired children. Speech, Hearing, and Language, 3, 41–57.Google Scholar
  11. Moleti, A., & Sisto, R. (2003). Objective estimates of cochlear tuning by otoacoustic emission analysis. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 113, 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Olaszy, G. (1985). A magyar beszéd leggyakoribb hangsorépítõ elemeinek szerkezete és szintézise. [The most frequent building elements of Hungarian speech: Acoustic structure and synthesis.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  13. Olaszy, G., Gordos, G., & Németh, G. (1992). The Multivox multilingual text-to-speech converter. In G. Bailly, C. Benoit, and T. R. Sawallis (Eds.), Talking Machines: Theories, models and designs (pp. 385-411). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Perkell, J.S., & Klatt, D.H. (Eds.) (1986). Invariance and variability in speech processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M´ria Gósy
    • 1
  1. 1.Phonetics LaboratoryResearch Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations