Abstract
“To be or not to be ....” This famous phrase not only introduces Hamlet’s dilemma, it also poses the question a scientific conjecture ultimately must confront. Until that confrontation occurs, the conjecture will be tenable if (1) there is no evidence contradicting it, and (2) it is based either on verified predictions or on a plausible theoretical framework (or both).a Sometimes conjectures graduate and become new paradigms, an example of which is general relativity.
“Conjecture” is being used in a very specific way, as indicated by the two conditions stated above.1 “Speculations,” on the other hand, satisfy neither of the requirements noted in the second of these two conditions. Exemplified by “What if ...” types of statements, they are akin to ad hoc proposals. Several will be encountered later in this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2007). Conjectures. In: Levin, F.S. (eds) Calibrating the Cosmos. Astronomers’ Universe Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49768-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49768-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-30778-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-49768-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)