Using Heart-Lung Interactions for Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring: Important Factors beyond Preload

  • J. C. Kubitz
  • D. A. Reuter
Conference paper


The basic mechanism underlying functional preload indices, such as stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), or systolic pressure variation (SPV), is that mechanical ventilation induces cyclic alterations in ventricular filling and, in consequence, in stroke volume and cardiac output. This phenomenon is most easily recognized in clinical practice as periodical variations in the arterial pressure signal. Based on the understanding of the Frank-Starling-relationship, i.e., the relation of cardiac preload and stroke volume, the ventilation-synchronous variations of cardiac output, or the indices named above, which serve as surrogates, allow assessment of left ventricular (LV) filling, and, more importantly the evaluation of the steepness of the patient-individual LV function curve [1]. The usefulness of these functional preload indices in assessing cardiac preload and in predicting whether a patient will respond to fluid administration with an increase in cardiac output (fluid responsiveness) has been demonstrated in many studies.


Right Ventricular Tidal Volume Fluid Responsiveness Intrathoracic Pressure Pulse Pressure Variation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Michard F, Reuter DA (2003) Assessing cardiac preload or volume responsiveness? It depends on the question we want to answer. Intensive Care Med 29:1396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pinsky MR (1984) Instantaneous venous return curves in an intact canine preparation. J Appl Physiol 56:765–771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vieillard-Baron A, Augarde R, Prin S, Page B, Beauchet A, Jardin F (2001) Influence of superior vena caval zone conditions on cyclic changes in right ventricular outflow during respiratory support. Anesthesiology 95:1083–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfer MS, et al (2003) Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume vaiation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 29:476–480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli, Koch M, Vincent JL (2005) Pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 31:517–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pizov R, Cohen M, Weiss Y, Segal E, Cotev S, Perel A (1996) Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced hemodynamic changes are reflected in the arterial pressure wave form. Crit Care Med 24:1381–1387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Michard F (2005) Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 103:419–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C, et al (1999) Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159: 935–939PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kubitz JC, Annecke T, Kemming GI, et al (2006) The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on stroke volume variation and central blood volume during open and closed chest conditions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30:90–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tournadre JP, Allaouchiche B, Cayrel V, Mathon L, Chassard D (2000) Estimation of cardiac preload changes by systolic pressure variation in pigs undergoing pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 44:231–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reuter DA, Goresch T, Goepfert MS, Wildhirt SM, Kilger E, Goetz AE (2004) Effects of midline thoracotomy on the interaction between mechanical ventilation and cardiac filling during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 92:808–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jardin F, Genevray B, Brun-Ney D, Bourdarias JP (1985) Influence of lung and chest wall compliances on transmission of airway pressures to the pleural space in critically ill patients. Chest 88:653–658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lai HY, Yang CCH, Cheng CF, et al (2004) Effect of esmolol on positive pressure ventilation induced variations of arterial pressure in anaesthetized humans. Clin Sci 107:303–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al (2006) Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 34:1402–1407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murphy BA, Durbin Jr CG (2005) Using ventilator and cardiovascular graphics in the patient who is hemodynamically unstable. Respir Care 50:262–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jardin F (2004) Cyclic changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 30:1047–1050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW et al (2003) Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med 31:1399–1404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pinsky MR (2005) Cardiovascular issues in respiratory care. Chest 128:592–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nouira S, Elatrous S, Dimassi S, et al. (2005) Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 33:2339–2343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P (1998) Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 89:1313–1321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chemla D, Hébert JL, Coirault C, et al (1998) Total arterial compliance estimated by stroke volume-to-pulse pressure ratio in humans. Am J Physiol 274:H500–H505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al (2000) Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:134–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, et al (2004) Assessing fluid responiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 21: 132–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C, Teboul JL (2003) Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest 124:1900–1908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Perel A, Minkovich L, Preisman S, Abiad M, Segal E, Coriat P (2005) Assessing fluid-responsiveness by a standardized ventilatory maneuver: the respiratory systolic variation test. Anesth Anlag 100:942–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A (2005) Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 95:746–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Kubitz
    • 1
  • D. A. Reuter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyHamburg-Eppendorf UniversityHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations