Skip to main content

We Haven’t Got a Plan, so What Can Go Wrong? Where is the NHS Coming from?

  • Chapter
Healthcare Knowledge Management

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

Abstract

There is no getting away from the fact that the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) needs managing. However, it seems there is no word that sits more uncomfortably than this one when it comes to the necessary business of administering the NHS. There are a hundred-and-one ways to interpret the form and function of the NHS, but one thing is for sure: it is an unsettled environment. There is a direct correlation between its perceived public health efficacy and the “reforms” instituted and administered down the years, both nationally and locally; and for those who are the administrators of the system, both front line and managerially, these reforms come so thick and fast that it seems there is never an opportunity to consolidate change.

At the apex of all this change are the political taskmasters devolving politics straight into the NHS via the NHS strategic health authorities (SHAs). The SHAs offer their vision for the future in their strategic frameworks, offering glimpses of the future via policy interpretation.

However, more is needed beyond strategic frameworks and the increased use of targeted performance measures to address the ills of the NHS.

There is one thing that will never change, whatever the future holds: people make the NHS function. No matter how these relationships are as dictated in the future, no matter how systemically the NHS changes, it will always need people to make it function. The current political climate dictates that reform is a collection point that beleaguered clinicians and managers need to gather around. The time for clinicians and managers to argue whether they are playing on the same team is over. The story is no longer the polemic of individual patient care versus resources and productivity, but one of joint leadership and mutual dependence between clinicians and managers. Taking a systems approach to handling this relationship step change can help overcome the culturally habituated behaviors that have held back the development of satisfying working relationships so far. Modeling these relationships is easy, and they are the focus of this chapter; embedding them in the belief that they are the only way to protect the dispensing of services in a locally sensitive way is another story.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Trent Strategic Health Authority. Planning with a purpose. Available from: http://www.tsha.nhs.uk/strategic-framework/planning-for-the-future/planning-with-apurpose [19 October 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leading Edge 2. Aligning what we say and how we behave. The NHS Confederation; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davies H., Marshall M, Mannion R. Impact of star performance ratings in English acute hospital trusts; 2005. Available from: http://www.rsm.ac.uk/new/pdfs/art_stars05.pdf [19 October 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  4. An independent audit of the NHS under Labour (1997–2005); April 2005. Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/resources/publications/an_independent.html [7 December 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  5. Department of Health. Empowering local communities; 2005. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAnd Guidance/PublicationsPAmpGBrowsableDocument/fs/en?CONTENTJD=4097241 &MULTIPAGEJD=4914654&chk=0DNFbU [7 December 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards N. Doctors and managers: poor relationships may be damaging patients—what can be done? Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:i21 (free full text).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. NHS Core Principles. Available from: http://www.nhs.uk/England/AboutTheNhs/Core Principles.cmsx [7 Decernber 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davies HTO, Harrison S. Trends in doctor-manager relationships. Br Med J 2003;326: 646–649 (free full text).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Waishe K. The rise of regulation in the NHS. Br Med J 2002;324:967–970. Available from: http://bmj.bmjjournaIs.com/cgi/conlent/full/324/7343/967 (free text) [10 December 2005].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haldenby A. NHS management—part of the problem or part of the solution? 2004. Available from: http://www.reform.co.uk/website/pressroorn/articles.aspx7os9 [10 December 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  11. Palmer K. How should we deal with hospital failure? Facing the challenges of the new NHS market. Available from: http://www.ki ngsfund.org.uk/resources/publ ications/ (free to download from the King’s Fund Website) [10 December 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Press release for NHS Confederation. NHS Confederation response to King’s Fund report. How should we deal with hospital failure? Facing the challenges of the new NHS market. Available from: http:/Avww.nhsconfed.org/press/releases/nhs_confederation_ response_toJdngs_fund_reportJiow_should_we_deal_withJhospitalJfailur.asp [10 December 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Power to the patients? Available from: http://www.spiked-online.com/Arlicles/ 0000000CA5CD.htm [7 December 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  14. Garelick A, Fagin L. The doctor-manager relationship. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2005; 11: 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. One in three NHS trusts plan to reduce services, BMA survey reveals, UK www.medicalnewsloday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=3.1119 (accessed 5 December 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Audit Commission. Early lessons from payments by results. Available from: www.audit-commission.gov.uk/reports/NATIONAL-REPORT.asp?CategoryID= ENGLISH 574&ProdID=B502F0FC-E007-4925-AD24-529C4889AD02&Section ID=sect66# [11 December 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  17. Times Online. Patient choice is damaging hospitals says NHS watchdog: 11 October 2005. Available from: [5 December 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crosson F. Kaiser Permanente: a propensity for partnership. Br Med J 2003;326:654 (free full text).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Copper, A. (2007). We Haven’t Got a Plan, so What Can Go Wrong? Where is the NHS Coming from?. In: Bali, R.K., Dwivedi, A.N. (eds) Healthcare Knowledge Management. Health Informatics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49009-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49009-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-33540-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-49009-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics