Skip to main content

The Impact of Equalization on Service Delivery

  • Chapter
Fiscal Equalization
  • 834 Accesses

Abstract

The founders of the Australian federation recognized the need for transfer payments from the national to state level governments and made provision in the Constitution to achieve that end. Transfers are required to overcome the vertical fiscal imbalance (VFI) between the levels of government and also to provide greater financial assistance to some States than to others. The arrangements for providing extra assistance to particular States were first formalized in 1933 with the creation assistance to particular States were first formalized in 1933 with the creation of the Commonwealth Grants Commission (the Commission). In 1936, the Commission (and the Australian Government) took a concept developed earlier by one of its members and decided that grants to the States would be provided on the basis of horizontal fiscal equalization (HFE). However, it was not until the early 1980s that a comprehensive system of HFE was introduced. As a result of this comprehensive system, the Commission has 26 years of data, from 1977–78 to 2002–03, on:

  1. i)

    The revenues and expenses of the States on a largely comparable accounting and classification basis

  2. ii)

    Australian average per capita State revenues and expenses

  3. iii)

    Standardized revenues and expenses of the States

  4. iv)

    The relative revenue raising capacities of the States, and their relative costs of providing Australia average levels of services; and

  5. v)

    The relative revenue raising efforts made by the States, and the relative levels of services they provide.

Catherine Hull is an Assistant Secretary at the Commonwealth Grants Commission. Bob Searle is a former Secretary of the Commission. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not the Commission. We would like to thank Rosa Benedictos and Linda Pure for help with the data analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Australian Government. 2004. Federal financial relations 2004–05, Budget Paper No 3. Canberra: CanPrint Communications Pty Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R. 2001. Inter-governmental fiscal relations: The facilitator of fiscal decentralization. Constitutional Political Economy, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Grants Commission. 1994. Information paper no 1, Education services, analysis and discussion of state policies, 1994. Canberra: Australia Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Grants Commission. 1995. Equality in diversity: History of the commonwealth grants commission, Second Edition. Canberra: Australian Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Grants Commission. 2001. Report on indigenous funding, 2001. Canberra: CanPrint Communications Pty Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Grants Commission. 2004a. Report on state revenue sharing relativities, 2004 Review. Canberra: CanPrint Communications Pty Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Grants Commission. 2004b. Report on state revenue sharing relativities, 2004 Review supporting information. Canberra: CanPrint Communications Pty Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forde, M. 1999. Inquiry into the abuse of children in Queensland institutions. Brisbane: Queensland Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Commission of Audit. 1988. Focus on reform, report on the state’s finances. Sydney: Government Printer New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Australian Commission of Audit. 1994. Charting the way forward, improving public sector performance. Adelaide: Gillingham Printers Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, F. and Bird, R. 2006. Expenditure-based equalization transfers, this Volume.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hull, C., Searle, B. (2007). The Impact of Equalization on Service Delivery. In: Martinez-Vazquez, J., Searle, B. (eds) Fiscal Equalization. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48988-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics