Abstract
Intergovernmental transfers are a major source of revenue for sub-national (regional and local) governments (hereafter SNG), representing 60 percent of their total revenue for developing countries and 33 percent for OECD countries (Shah, 2004). The continued and growing decentralization observed in many countries calls for a better understanding of the design, role and impact of fiscal transfers. Prominent among the objectives commonly attributed to intergovernmental fiscal transfers is ‘equalization’ although exactly what this term means is often rather obscure and may differ from country to country or even over time within any one country. Our focus in this paper is on those transfers specifically labeled as equalization transfers, and in particular on the extent to which and the method by which differences in expenditure ‘needs’ can and should be formally incorporated into such transfers.
We thank Philippe Wingender for his excellent contributions to this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Afonso, José Roberto R. 2000. Intergovernment transfers: Brazilian experience. Paper presented at International Seminar on Fiscal Federalism, SCHP-CEPAL-ILPES, Cancun, Mexico.
Afonso, José Roberto R. and Luiz de Mello (2000) “Brazil: An Evolving Federation.” IMF/FAD Seminar on Decentralization, Washington, November.
Ahmad, Ehtisham, ed. 1997. Financing Decentralized Expenditures: An International Comparison of Grants. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Bahl, Roy, and Jorge Martinez-Vazquez. 2003. Fiscal federalism and economic reform. International Studies Program Working Paper No. 03-14, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
Bayenet, Benoit, and Phillipe de Bruycker. 2003. Belgium: A Unique Evolving Federalism. World Bank Institute, Washington.
Bird, Richard M. 1986. Federal Finance in Comparative Perspective. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.
____, and Duanjie Chen. 1998. Intergovernmental fiscal relations in China in international perspective. In Taxation in Modern China, Donald J.S. Brean, ed., London: Routledge.
____, and Ariel Fiszbein. 1998. Colombia: The central role of the central government in fiscal decentralization. In Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries, Richard M. Bird and Francois Vaillancourt, eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
____, and Enid Slack. 1990. Equalization: The representative tax system revisited. Canadian Tax Journal, 38: 913–27.
____, and Andrey V. Tarasov. 2004. Closing the gap: fiscal imbalances and intergovernmental transfers in developed federations. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 22: 77–102.
Boadway, Robin. 2001. Equalization revisited: Its role and design. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Atlantic Provinces Economics Association, Fredericton, New Brunswick.
____. 2003. Options for Fiscal Federalism. Royal Commission on Renewing and Strengthening Our Place in Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John’s.
____. 2004. The theory and practice of equalization. CESifo Economic Studies, 50(1): 211–254.
____, and Frank Flatters. 1982. Equalization in a Federal State: An Economic Analysis. Ottawa: Economic Council of Canada.
____, and Paul A.R. Hobson. 1993. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Canada. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.
Breton, Albert, and Anthony Scott. 1978. The Economic Constitution of Federal States. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Buchanan, James M. 1950. Federalism and fiscal equity. American Economic Review, 40:583–599.
Commonwealth Grants Commission (CGC). 2004. Report on State Revenue Sharing Relativities, 2004 Update. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Courchene, Thomas J. 1978. Avenues of adjustment: The transfer system and regional disparities. In Canadian Confederation at the Crossroads: The Search for Federal-Provincial Balance, M. Walker, ed., Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.
____. 1998. Renegotiating Equalization: National Polity, Federal State, International Economy, CD. Howe Institute Commentary 113, CD. Howe Institute, Toronto.
Craig, Jon. 1997. Australia. In Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice, Teresa Ter-Minassian, ed., Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
Dafflon, Bernard. 2004. Federal-Cantonal Equalisation in Switzerland: An Overview of the Present System and Reform in Progress, Working Paper No 356, BENEFRI Center for Studies in Public Economics, University of Fribourg.
____, and François Vaillancourt. 2003. Problems of equalisation in federal system. In Federalism in a Changing World — Learning from Each Other, Blindenbacher R. and A. Koller, eds., Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Ebel, Robert D., and Serdar Yilmaz. 2003. On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization. In Public Finance in Developing and Transitional Countries, Jorge Martinez-Vazquez and James Alm, eds., Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Garcia-Mila, Teresa, and Therese J. McGuire. 2003. Fiscal Decentralization in Spain: An Asymmetric Transition to Democracy, World Bank Institute, Washington, D.C.
International Symposium on Intergovernmental Transfers in Asian Countries: Issues and Practices (2001) Tokyo: Asian Public Policy Program, Graduate School of International Corporate Strategy, Hitotsubashi University.
Laurent, Stephen, and François Vaillancourt. 2003. Federal transfers in Canada and the United States, 1989–1990 to 1998–1999: How equalizing are they? In National Tax Association, Proceedings 2002 Annual Conference, 203–212.
Lotz, Jorgen. 1997. Denmark and Other Scandinavian Countries: Equalization and Grants. In Financing Decentralized Expenditures: An International Comparison of Grants, Ehtisham Ahmad, ed., Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Ma, Jun. 1997. Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: A comparison of nine countries. Paper prepared for the Macroeconomic Management and Policy Division, Economic Development Institute, Washington: World Bank.
Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge. 2002. Equalization goals, allocation factors and international practices. Paper presented at ASEM International Workshop on Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in East Asia, Bali, Indonesia.
Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, and Jamie Boex. 2001. The design of equalization grants: theory and applications, Part One: theory and concepts. World Bank Institute, Washington.
Musgrave, Richard A. 1961. Approaches to a fiscal theory of political federalism. In Public Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization, National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Oakland, William. 1994. Fiscal equalization: An empty box? National Tax Journal, 47: 199–209.
OECD. 1999. Taxing Powers of State and Local Government Paris.
Petchey, Jeff, and Sophia Levtchenkova. 2006. Fiscal capacity equalization and economic efficiency. In this volume.
Rao, M. Govinda. 2004. Changing contours in federal fiscal arrangements in India. Paper presented at International Symposium on Fiscal Decentralization in Asia Revisited, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo.
Rye, C. Richard, and Bob Searle. 1997. Expenditure needs: institutions and data. In Financing Decentralized Expenditures: An International Comparison of Grants, Ehtisham Ahmad, ed., Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Scott, Anthony D. 1952. Federal grants and resource allocation. Journal of Political Economy, 60: 534–538.
Shah, Anwar. 1994. A fiscal needs approach to equalization transfer in a decentralized federation. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No 1289, World Bank, Washington.
____, 1994a. The Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Developing and Emerging Market Economies. Policy and Research Series, Washington: World Bank.
____. 1996. A fiscal need approach to equalization. Canadian Public Policy, 22(2): 99–115.
____. 2004. Lessons from international practices of intergovernmental fiscal transfers. Paper presented at XVI Regional Seminar on Fiscal Policy CEPAL/ECLAC, Santiago de Chile.
Slukhai, Sergii, ed. 2003. Dilemmas and Compromises: Fiscal Equalization in Transition Countries. Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative. Budapest: Open Society Institute.
Smart, Michael. 1998. Taxation and deadweight loss in a system of intergovernmental transfers. Canadian Journal of Economics, 31: 189–206.
Spahn, Paul B., and Wolfgang Föttinger. 1997. Germany. In Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice, Teresa Ter-Minassian, ed., Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
Spahn, Paul B., and Oliver Franz. 2000. Consensus democracy and interjurisdictional fiscal solidarity in Germany. Paper Presented at IMF Fiscal Affairs Department Conference on Fiscal Decentralization, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
Ter-Minassian, Teresa. Ed. 1997. Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Vaillancourt, François. 2001. Intergovernmental Finance in Laos. World Bank, Washington.
Watson, William G. 1986. An estimate of the welfare gains from fiscal equalization. Canadian Journal of Economics, 19: 298–308.
Wilson, Leonard S. 2003. Equalization, efficiency and migration: Watson revisited. Canadian Public Policy, 29(4): 385–396.
Wong, Christine. 2003. Ethnic minority regions and fiscal decentralization in China: The promises and reality of asymmetric treatment. Working paper, University of Washington.
World Bank. 2002. Brazil: Issues in Fiscal Federalism, Report No 22523-BR, Washington.
Zhang, Zhihua, and Jorge Martinez-Vazquez. 2003. The system of equalization transfers in China. International Studies Program Working Paper No. 03-12, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bird, R., Vaillancourt, F. (2007). Expenditure-Based Equalization Transfers. In: Martinez-Vazquez, J., Searle, B. (eds) Fiscal Equalization. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48988-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48988-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-48987-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-48988-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)