Advertisement

Semantic Web pp 317-340 | Cite as

Sembowser - Semantic Biological Web Services Registry

Chapter

Abstract

There are now more than a thousand Web Services [22] offering access to disparate biological resources namely data and computational tools. It is extremely difficult for biological researchers to search in a Web Services (WS) registry for a relevant WS using the standard (primarily computational) descriptions used to describe it. Semantic Biological Web Services Registry (SemBOWSER) is an ontology-based implementation of the UDDI specification, which enables, at present, glycoproteomics researchers to publish, search and discover WS using semantic, service-level, descriptive domain keywords. SemBOWSER classifies a WS along two dimensions- the task they implement and the domain they are associated with. Each published WS is associated with the relevant ProPreO (comprehensive process ontology for glycoproteomics experimental lifecycle) ontology-based keywords (implemented as part of the registry). A researcher, in turn, can search for relevant WS using only the descriptive keywords, part of their everyday working lexicon. This intuitive search is underpinned by the ProPreO ontology, thereby making use of the inherent advantages of a semantic search, as compared to a purely syntactic search, namely disambiguation and use of named relationships between concepts. SemBOWSER is part of the glycoproteomics web portal’ stargate’.

Key words

Semantic Web services Web services registry ProPreO ontology SemBOWSER registry WSDL-S biomedical glycomics service-level semantic annotation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Aleman-Meza B., Halaschek-Wiener C., Arpinar I.A., Ramakrishnan C., and Sheth, A., Ranking Complex Relationships on the Semantic Web, IEEE Internet Computing, 9(3), pp. 37–44, May/June 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., and Lipman D.J. “Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Anyanwu K., Maduko A., and Sheth. A. SemRank: Ranking Complex Relationship Search Results on the Semantic Web. In the Proceedings of the 14th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2005), May 2005. Chiba Japan, 117–127.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Ashburner M., Ball C.A., Blake J.A., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J.M., Davis A.P., Dolinski K., Dwight S.S., Eppig J.T., Harris M.A., Hill D.P., Issel-Tarver L., Kasarskis, A., Lewis S., Matese J.C., Richardson J.E., Ringwald M., Rubin G.M., Sherlock G. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium Nature Genet. 25: 25–29, 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bateman A., Coin L., Durbin R., Finn R.D., Hollich V., Griffiths-Jones S., Khanna A., Marshall M., Moxon S., Sonnhammer E.L.L., Studholme D.J., Yeats C, and Eddy S.R., “The Pfam Protein Families Database”, Nucleic Acids ResearchDatabase Issue 32:D138–D141, 2004 (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Pfam/)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Cardoso J., Sheth A., Miller J., Arnold J., and Kochut K., Quality of Service for Workflows and Web Service Processes, Journal of Web Semantics, Elsevier, 1(3), 281–308, 2004.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Goble C, Using the Semantic Web for e-Science: Inspiration, Incubation, Irritation Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3729:1–3Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Gomadam K., Verma K., Brewer D., Sheth A.P., and Miller, J.A. Radiant: A tool for semantic annotation of Web Services, 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2005) Galway, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    http://bioontology.org/resources-obo.html, Open Biomedical Ontologies-OBOGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/meteor-s/, METEOR-S: Semantic Web services and processesGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, NCBI homepageGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    http://www.rosettanet.org/Rosettanet/Public/PublicHomePage, RosettaNet StandardGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    http://www.snomed.org/snomedct/, SNOMED-CTGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    http://www.uddi.org/, UDDIGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/, W3C Semantic Web Health Care and Life Sciences Interest GroupGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/#Charter, Semantic Annotations for WSDL Working Group charterGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    http://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/, OWL-SGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl, Web Services Description Language-WSDLGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSDL-S/, WSDL-SGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/, Web Ontology Language-OWLGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d16/d16.l/v0.21/, Web Service Modeling Language (WSML)Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Hull D., Stevens R., and Lord P. Describing Web Services for user-oriented retrieval W3C Workshop on Frameworks for Semantics in Web Services, Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI), Innsbruck, Austria. 2005.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Li K., Verma K., Miller J., Gomadam K., and Sheth A., Semantic Web Process Design, in Semantic Web Processes and Their Applications. J. Cardiso, A. Sheth, Editors. Springer, 2006 (in print)Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Lord P., Bechhofer S., Wilkinson M.D., Schiltz G., Gessler D.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Hull D., Goble C, Stein L. Applying semantic web services to Bioinformatics: Experiences gained, lessons learnt in ISWC 2004. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, p350–364.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Lord P., Alper P., Wroe C, and Goble C., Feta: A light-weight architecture for user oriented semantic service discovery in Proc of 2 nd European Semantic Web Conference, Crete, June 2005.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Nagarajan M., Verma K., Sheth A.P., Miller J., and Lathem J., Semantic Interoperability of Web Services-Challenges and Experiences, ICWS 2006 Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Navas-Delgado I., Rojano-Muñoz M., Ramírez S., Pérez A.J., Andrés León E., Aldana-Montes J.F., and Trelles O. Intelligent client for integrating bioinformatics services, Bioinformatics Advance Access published on January 1, 2006, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti740. Bioinformatics 22: 106–111., 2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Oinn T., Greenwood M., Addis M., Alpdemir M.N., Ferris J., Glover K., Goble C, Goderis A., Hull D., Marvin D., Li P., Lord P., Pocock M.R., Senger M., Stevens R., Wipat A., and Wroe C. Taverna: Lessons in creating a workflow environment for the life sciences Concurrency Computat. Pract. Exper. 00:1–7, 2000.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Oldham N., Verma K., Sheth A.P., Hakimpour F., Semantic WS-Agreement Partner Selection, Proceedings of the 15th International World Wide Web (WWW) Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, May, 2006, 697–706, 2006.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Patil A., Oundhakar S., Sheth A., and Verma K., METEOR-S Web service Annotation Framework, Proceeding of the World Wide Web Conference, New York, NY, May 2004, 553–562, 2004.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Roman D., Keller U., Lausen H., de Bruijn J., Lara R., Stollberg M., Polleres A., Feier C, Bussler C, and Fensel D., Web Service Modeling Ontology, Applied Ontology, 1(1): 77–106, 2005.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Sahoo S.S., Sheth A., York W.S., and Miller J.S., Semantic Web Services for N-glycosylation Process, International Symposium on Web Services for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, VBI, Blacksburg, VA, USA May 26–27, 2005Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Sahoo S.S., Thomas C.J., Sheth A.P., York W.S., and Tartir S., Knowledge Modeling and its Application in Life Sciences: A Tale of two Ontologies, Proceedings of the 15th International World Wide Web (WWW) Conference, Edinburgh, Scotlands, May, 2006, pp. 317–326, 2006.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Sheth A., van der Alst W., and Arpinar I. B. Processes Driving the Networked Economy. IEEE Concurrency 7,3, 18–31, July–September 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Smith B., Kumar A., and Bittner T. Basic Formal Ontology for Bioinformatics, http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~akumar/JAIS.pdfGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Wu C.H., Apweiler R., Bairoch A., Natale D.A., Barker W.C., Boeckmann B., Ferro S., Gasteiger E., Huang H., Lopez R., Magrane M., Martin M.J., Mazumder R., O’Donovan C, Redaschi N., and Suzek B. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): an expanding universe of protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:D187–D19, 2006. http://www.pir.uniprot.org/PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Large Scale Distributed Information Systems (LSDIS) Lab, Computer Science Department and Complex Cabohydrate Research Center (CCRC)University of GeorgiaUSA

Personalised recommendations