The Contribution of the Neural Crest to the Vertebrate Body

  • Elisabeth Dupin
  • Sophie Creuzet
  • Nicole M. Le Douarin
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (volume 589)

Abstract

As a transitory structure providing adult tissues of the vertebrates with very diverse cell types, the neural crest (NC) has attracted for long the interest of developmental biologists and is still the subject of ongoing research in a variety of animal models. Here we review a number of data from in vivo cell tracing and in vitro single cell culture experiments, which gained new insights on the mechanisms of cell migration, proliferation and differentiation during NC ontogeny. We put emphasis on the role of Hox genes, morphogens and interactions with neighbouring tissues in specifying and patterning the skeletogenic NC cells in the head. We also include advances made towards characterizing multipotent stem cells in the early NC as well as in various NC derivatives in embryos and even in adult.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    His W. Untersuchungen über die erste Anlage des Wirbeltierleibes. Die erste Entwickelung des Hühnchens im Ei. Leipzig: FCW Vogel, 1868.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Le Douarin N. The Neural Crest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hörstadius S. The neural crest: Its properties and derivatives in the light of experimental research. London: Oxford University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Le Douarin N. Particularités du noyau interphasique chez la Caille japonaise (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Utilisation de ces particularités comme «marquage biologique» dans les recherches sur les interactions tissulaires et les migrations cellulaires au cours de l’ontogenèse. Bull Biol Fr Belg 1969; 103:435–452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Le Douarin N. A biological cell labeling technique and its use in experimental embryology. Dev Biol 1973; 30:217–222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Le Douarin NM, Kalcheim C. The Neural Crest. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Danielian PS, Muccino D, Rowitch DH et al. Modification of gene activity in mouse embryos in utero by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre-recombinase. Curr Biol 1998; 8(24): 1323–1326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chai Y, Jiang X, Ito Y et al. Fate of the mammalian cranial neural crest during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis. Development 2000; 127(8):1671–1679.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang X, Iseki S, Maxson RE et al. Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault. Dev Biol 2002; 241(1):106–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matsuoka T, Ahlberg P, Kessaris N et al. Neural crest origins of the neck and shoulder. Nature 2005; 436:347–355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pietri T, Eder O, Blanche M et al. The human tissue plasminogen activator-Cre mouse: A new tool for targeting specifically neural crest cells and their derivatives in vivo. Dev Biol 2003; 259(1):176–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wilkinson DG, Bailes JA, McMahon AP. Expression of the proto-oncogene int-1 is restricted to specific neural cells in the developing mouse embryo. Cell 1987; 50(1):79–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis CA, Joyner AL. Expression patterns of the homeo box-containing genes En-1 and En-2 and the proto-oncogene int-1 diverge during mouse development. Genes Dev 1988; 2(12B):1736–1744.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Molven A, Njolstad PR, Fjose A. Genomic structure and restricted neural expression of the zebrafish wnt-1 (int-1) gene. EMBO J 1991; 10(4):799–807.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McMahon AP, Joyner AL, Bradley A et al. The midbrain-hindbrain phenotype of Wnt-1-/Wnt-1-mice results from stepwise deletion of engrailed-expressing cells by 9.5 days postcoitum. Cell 1992; 69(4):581–595.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wolda SL, Moody CJ, Moon RT. Overlapping expression of Xwnt-3A and Xwnt-1 in neural tissue of Xenopus laevis embryos. Dev Biol 1993; 155(1):46–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Echelard Y, Vassileva G, McMahon AP. Cis-acting regulatory sequences governing Wnt-1 expression in the developing mouse CNS. Development 1994; 120(8):2213–2224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Szeder V, Grim M, Halata Z et al. Neural crest origin of mammalian Merkel cells. Dev Biol 2003; 253(2):258–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Valinsky JE, Le Douarin NM. Production of plasminogen activator by migrating cephalic neural crest cells. EMBO J 1985; 4(6):1403–1406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Soriano P. Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet 1999; 21(1):70–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mao X, Fujiwara Y, Chapdelaine A et al. Activation of EGFP expression by Cre-mediated excision in a new ROSA26 reporter mouse strain. Blood 2001; 97(1):324–326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lo L, Dormand EL, Anderson DJ. Late-emigrating neural crest cells in the roof plate are restricted to a sensory fate by GDF7. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102(20):7192–7197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gershon MD. The Second Brain. New York: Harper Collins, 1998.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saxod R. Development of Merkel corpuscules in the chicken beak. The problem of their origin and identity. Biol Cell 1980; 7:61–66.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saxod R. Ontogeny of the cutaneous sensory organs. Microsc Res Tech 1996; 34(4):313–333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Joseph NM, Mukouyama YS, Mosher JT et al. Neural crest stem cells undergo multilineage differentiation in developing peripheral nerves to generate endoneurial fibroblasts in addition to Schwann cells. Development 2004; 131(22):5599–5612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kalcheim C. Mechanisms of early neural crest development: From cell specification to migration. Int Rev Cytol 2000; 200:143–196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nieto MA. The early steps of neural crest development. Mech Dev 2001; 105(1–2):27–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Knecht AK, Bronner-Fraser M. Induction of the neural crest: A multigene process. Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3(6):453–461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huang X, Saint-Jeannet JP. Induction of the neural crest and the opportunities of life on the edge. Dev Biol 2004; 275(1):1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Duband JL, Monier F, Dclannet M et al. Epithelium-mesenchyme transition during neural crest development. Acta Anat 1995; 154(1):63–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Perris R, Perissinotto D. Role of the extracellular matrix during neural crest cell migration. Mech Dev 2000; 95(1–2):3–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sela-Donenfeld D, Kalcheim C. Inhibition of noggin expression in the dorsal neural tube by somitogenesis: A mechanism for coordinating the timing of neural crest emigration. Development 2000; 127(22):4845–4854.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Savagner P. Leaving the neighborhood: Molecular mechanisms involved during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. BioEssays 2001; 23(10):912–923.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Erickson CA, Duong TD, Tosney KW. Descriptive and experimental analysis of the dispersion of neural crest cells along the dorsolateral path and their entry into ectoderm in the chick embryo. Dev Biol 1992; 151(1):251–272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Couly G, Grapin-Botton A, Coltey P et al. The regeneration of the cephalic neural crest, a problem revisited: The regenerating cells originate from the contralateral or from the anterior and posterior neural fold. Development 1996; 122(11):3393–3407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Koentges G, Lumsden A. Rhombencephalic neural crest segmentation is preserved throughout craniofacial ontogeny. Development 1996; 122(10):3229–3242.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Le Douarin NM, Creuzet S, Couly G et al. Neural crest cell plasticity and its limits. Development 2004; 131(19):4637–4650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lumsden A, Sprawson N, Graham A. Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. Development 1991; 113(4):1281–1291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Graham A, Heyman I, Lumsden A. Even-numbered rhombomeres control the apoptotic elimination of neural crest cells from odd-numbered rhombomeres in the chick hindbrain. Development 1993; 119(1):233–245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Graham A, Francis-West P, Brickell P et al. The signalling molecule BMP4 mediates apoptosis in the rhombencephalic neural crest. Nature 1994; 372(6507):684–686.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wilkinson DG. Multiple roles of EPH receptors and ephrins in neural development. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2(3):155–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Teillet MA, Kalcheim C, Le Douarin NM. Formation of the dorsal root ganglia in the avian embryo: Segmental origin and migratory behavior of neural crest progenitor cells. Dev Biol 1987; 120(2):329–347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kalcheim C, Teillet MA. Consequences of somite manipulation on the pattern of dorsal root ganglion development. Development 1989; 106:85–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kulesa PM, Fraser SE. Neural crest cell dynamics revealed by time-lapse video microscopy of whole embryo chick explant cultures. Dev Biol 1998; 204(2):327–344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kulesa PM, Fraser SE. In ovo time-lapse analysis of chick hindbrain neural crest cell migration shows cell interactions during migration to the branchial arches. Development 2000; 127(6):1161–1172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kulesa P, Ellies DL, Trainor PA. Comparative analysis of neural crest cell death, migration, and function during vertebrate embryogenesis. Dev Dyn 2004; 229(1): 14–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Teddy JM, Kulesa PM. In vivo evidence for short-and long-range cell communication in cranial neural crest cells. Development 2004; 131(24):6141–6151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Delannet M, Duband JL. Transforming growth factor-beta control of cell-substratum adhesion during avian neural crest cell emigration in vitro. Development 1992; 116(1):275–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sela-Donenfeld D, Kalcheim C. Regulation of the onset of neural crest migration by coordinated activity of BMP4 and Noggin in the dorsal neural tube. Development 1999; 126(21):4749–4762.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    de Melker AA, Desban N, Duband JL. Cellular localization and signaling activity of beta-catenin in migrating neural crest cells. Dev Dyn 2004; 230(4):708–726.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rovasio RA, Delouvee A, Yamada KM et al. Neural crest cell migration: Requirements for exogenous fibronectin and high cell density. J Cell Biol 1983; 96(2):462–473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Debby-Brafrnan A, Burstyn-Cohen T, Klar A et al. F-Spondin, expressed in somite regions avoided by neural crest cells, mediates inhibition of distinct somite domains to neural crest migration. Neuron 1999; 22(3):475–488.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Krull CE, Collazo A, Fraser SE et al. Segmental migration of trunk neural crest: Time-lapse analysis reveals a role for PNA-binding molecules. Development 1995; 121(11):3733–3743.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Krull CE, Lansford R, Gale NW et al. Interactions of Eph-related receptors and ligands confer rostrocaudal pattern to trunk neural crest migration. Curr Biol 1997; 7(8):571–580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wang HU, Anderson DJ. Eph family transmembrane ligands can mediate repulsive guidance of trunk neural crest migration and motor axon outgrowth. Neuron 1997; 18(3):383–396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Santiago A, Erickson CA. Ephrin-B ligands play a dual role in the control of neural crest cell migration. Development 2002; 129(15):3621–3632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Jia L, Cheng L, Raper J. Slit/Robo signaling is necessary to confine early neural crest cells to the ventral migratory pathway in the trunk. Dev Biol 2005; 282(2):411–421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    De Bellard ME, Rao Y, Bronner-Fraser M. Dual function of Slit2 in repulsion and enhanced migration of trunk, but not vagal, neural crest cells. J Cell Biol 2003; 162(2):269–279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tosney KW. Long-distance cue from emerging dermis stimulates neural crest melanoblast migration. Dev Dyn 2004; 229(1):99–108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kubota Y, Ito K. Chemotactic migration of mesencephalic neural crest cells in the mouse. Dev Dyn 2000; 217(2):170–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Young HM, Hearn CJ, Farlie PG et al. GDNF is a chemoattractant for enteric neural cells. Dev Biol 2001; 229(2):503–516.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Iwashita T, Kruger GM, Pardal R et al. Hirschsprung disease is linked to defects in neural crest stem cell function. Science 2003; 301(5635):972–976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Jiang Y, Liu MT, Gershon MD. Netrins and DCC in the guidance of migrating neural crest-derived cells in the developing bowel and pancreas. Dev Biol 2003; 258(2):364–384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kawasaki T, Bekku Y, Suto F et al. Requirement of neuropilin 1-mediated Sema3A signals in patterning of the sympathetic nervous system. Development 2002; 129(3):671–680.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Eickholt BJ, Mackenzie SL, Graham A et al. Evidence for collapsin-1 functioning in the control of neural crest migration in both trunk and hindbrain regions. Development 1999; 126(10):2181–2189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Osborne NJ, Begbie J, Chilton JK et al. Semaphorin/neuropilin signaling influences the positioning of migratory neural crest cells within the hindbrain region of the chick. Dev Dyn 2005; 232(4):939–949.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Yu HH, Moens CB. Semaphorin signaling guides cranial neural crest cell migration in zebrafish. Dev Biol 2005; 280(2):373–385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Soo K, O’Rourke MP, Khoo PL et al. Twist function is required for the morphogenesis of the cephalic neural tube and the differentiation of the cranial neural crest cells in the mouse embryo. Dev Biol 2002; 247(2):251–270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Golding JP, Trainor P, Krumlauf R et al. Defects in pathfinding by cranial neural crest cells in mice lacking the neuregulin receptor ErbB4. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2(2):103–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Golding JP, Dixon M, Gassmann M. Cues from neuroepithelium and surface ectoderm maintain neural crest-free regions within cranial mesenchyme of the developing chick. Development 2002; 129(5):1095–1105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Davy A, Aubin J, Soriano P. Ephrin-B1 forward and reverse signaling are required during mouse development. Genes Dev 2004; 18(5):572–583.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Couly GF, Coltey PM, Le Douarin NM. The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: A study in quail-chick chimeras. Development 1993; 117:409–429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Le Lièvre CS. Participation of neural crest-derived cells in the genesis of the skull in birds. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1978; 47:17–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Smith MM, Hall BK. Development and evolutionary origins of vertebrate skeletogenic and odontogenic tissues. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 1990; 65(3):277–373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Smith MM, Hall BK. A developmental model for evolution of the vertebrate exoskeleton and teeth. In: Hecht M, MacIntire R, Clegg M, eds. Evolutionary Biology. Vol 27. New York: Plenum, 1993:277–373.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hall BK. Development of the clavicles in birds and mammals. J Exp Zool 2001; 289(3):153–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    McGonnell IM, McKay IJ, Graham A. A population of caudally migrating cranial neural crest cells: Functional and evolutionary implications. Dev Biol 2001; 236(2):354–363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Huang R, Zhi Q, Patel K et al. Dual origin and segmental organisation of the avian scapula. Development 2000; 127(17):3789–3794.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Le Lièvre C, Le Douarin NM. Mesenchymal derivatives of the neural crest: Analysis of chimaeric quail and chick embryos. J Embryol Exp Morph 1975; 34:125–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Kirby ML, Stewart DE. Neural crest origin of cardiac ganglion cells in the chick embryo: Identification and extirpation. Dev Biol 1983; 97:433–443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Kirby ML, Gale TF, Stewart DE. Neural crest cells contribute to normal aorticopulmonary septation. Science 1983; 220(4601):1059–1061.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Kirby ML, Turnage KL, Hayes BM. Characterization of conotruncal malformations following ablation of «cardiac» neural crest. Anat Rec 1985; 213:87–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Epstein JA. Pax3, neural crest and cardiovascular development. Trends Cardiov Med 1996; 6(8):255–260.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Jiang X, Rowitch DH, Soriano P et al. Fate of the mammalian cardiac neural crest. Development 2000; 127(8):1607–1616.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Creazzo TL, Godt RE, Leatherbury L et al. Role of cardiac neural crest cells in cardiovascular development. Annu Rev Physiol 1998; 60:267–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Waldo K, Zdanowicz M, Burch J et al. A novel role for cardiac neural crest in heart development. J Clin Invest 1999; 103(11):1499–1507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Eichmann A, Corbel C, Nataf V et al. Ligand-dependent development of the endothelial and hemopoietic lineages from embryonic mesodermal cells expressing vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94(10):5141–5146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Eichmann A, Marcelle C, Bréant C et al. Two molecules related to the VEGF receptor are expressed in early endothelial cells during avian embryonic development. Mech Dev 1993; 42(1–2):33–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Eichmann A, Marcelle C, Bréant C et al. Molecular cloning of Quek 1 and 2, two quail vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-like molecules. Gene 1996; 174(1):3–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Etchevers HC, Vincent C, Le Douarin NM et al. The cephalic neural crest provides pericytes and smooth muscle cells to all blood vessels of the face and forebrain. Development 2001; 128(7):1059–1068.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Creuzet S, Vincent C, Couly G. Neural crest derivatives in ocular and periocular structures. Int J Dev Biol 2005; 49(2–3):161–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Hunt P, Gulisano M, Cook M et al. A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the vertebrate head. Nature 1991; 353(6347):861–864.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Prince V, Lumsden A. Hoxa-2 expression in normal and transposed rhombomeres: Independent regulation in the neural tube and neural crest. Development 1994; 120(4):911–923.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Gendron-Maguire M, Mallo M, Zhang M et al. Hoxa-2 mutant mice exhibit homeotic transformation of skeletal elements derived from cranial neural crest. Cell 1993; 75(7): 1317–1331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Rijli FM, Mark M, Lakkaraju S et al. A homeotic transformation is generated in the rostral branchial region of the head by disruption of Hoxa-2, which acts as a selector gene. Cell 1993; 75(7): 1333–1349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Grammatopoulos GA, Bell E, Toole L et al. Homeotic transformation of branchial arch identity after Hoxa2 overexpression. Development 2000; 127(24):5355–5365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Pasqualetti M, Ori M, Nardi I et al. Ectopic Hoxa2 induction after neural crest migration results in homeosis of jaw elements in Xenopus. Development 2000; 127(24):5367–5378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Creuzet S, Schuler B, Couly G et al. Reciprocal relationships between Fgf8 and neural crest cells in facial and forebrain development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101(14):4843–4847.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Couly G, Grapin-Botton A, Coltey P et al. Determination of the identity of the derivatives of the cephalic neural crest: Incompatibility between Hox gene expression and lower jaw development. Development 1998; 125(17):3445–3459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Couly G, Creuzet S, Bennaceur S et al. Interactions between Hox-negative cephalic neural crest cells and the foregut endoderm in patterning the facial skeleton in the vertebrate head. Development 2002; 129(4):1061–1073.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Creuzet S, Couly G, Vincent C et al. Negative effect of Hox gene expression on the development of the neural crest-derived facial skeleton. Development 2002; 129(18):4301–4013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Chisaka O, Capecchi MR. Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene hox-1.5. Nature 1991; 350(6318):473–479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Lufkin T, Dierich A, LeMeur M et al. Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression. Cell 1991; 66(6):1105–1119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Manley NR, Capecchi MR. The role of Hoxa-3 in mouse thymus and thyroid development. Development 1995; 121(7):1989–2003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Drews U, Kocher-Becker U, Drews U. Die Induktion von Kiemenknorpel aus Kopfneuralleistenmaterial durch präsumptiven Kiemendarm in der Gewebekultur und das Bewegungsverhalten der Zellen während ihrer Entwicklung zu Knorpel. Roux’ Arch 1972; 171(1):17–37.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Epperlein HH. The ectomesenchymal-endodermal interaction-system (EEIS) of Triturus alpestris in tissue culture. I. Observations on attachment, migration and differentiation of neural crest cells. Differentiation 1974; 2(3):151–168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Veitch E, Begbie J, Schilling TF et al. Pharyngeal arch patterning in the absence of neural crest. Curr Biol 1999; 9(24):1481–1484.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Piotrowski T, Nusslein-Volhard C. The endoderm plays an important role in patterning the segmented pharyngeal region in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Dev Biol 2000; 225(2):339–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Crump JG, Maves L, Lawson ND et al. An essential role for Fgfs in endodermal pouch formation influences later craniofacial skeletal patterning. Development 2004; 131(22):5703–5716.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Ruhin B, Creuzet S, Vincent C et al. Patterning of the hyoid cartilage depends upon signals arising from the ventral foregut endoderm. Dev Dyn 2003; 228:239–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Trumpp A, Depew MJ, Rubenstein JLR et al. Cre-mediated gene inactivation demonstrates that FGF8 is required for cell survival and patterning of the first branchial arch. Genes Dev 1999; 13:3136–3148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Trainor PA, Krumlauf R. Hox genes, neural crest cells and branchial arch patterning. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001; 13(6):698–705.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Tucker AS, Yamada G, Grigoriou M et al. Fgf-8 determines rostral-caudal polarity in the first branchial arch. Development 1999; 126(1):51–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Wilson J, Tucker AS. Fgf and Bmp signals repress the expression of Bapx1 in the mandibular mesenchyme and control the position of the developing jaw joint. Dev Biol 2004; 266(1): 138–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Hu D, Marcucio RS, Helms JA. A zone of frontonasal ectoderm regulates patterning and growth in the face. Development 2003; 130(9): 1749–1758.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Wu P, Jiang TX, Suksaweang S et al. Molecular shaping of the beak. Science 2004; 305(5689): 1465–1466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Schneider RA, Helms JA. The cellular and molecular origins of beak morphology. Science 24 2003; 299(5606):565–568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Tucker AS, Lumsden A. Neural crest cells provide species-specific patterning information in the developing branchial skeleton. Evol Dev 2004; 6(1):32–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Le Douarin NM, Dupin E. Mulripotentiality of the neural crest. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2003; 13(5):529–536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Baroffio A, Dupin E, Le Douarin NM. Clone-forming ability and differentiation potential of migratory neural crest cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85(14):5325–5329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Baroffio A, Dupin E, Le Douarin NM. Common precursors for neural and mesectodermal derivatives in the cephalic neural crest. Development 1991; 112(1):301–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Dupin E, Baroffio A, Dulac C et al. Schwann-cell differentiation in clonal cultures of the neural crest, as evidenced by the anti-Schwann cell myelin protein monoclonal antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87(3):1119–1123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Sieber-Blum M. Role of the neurotrophic factors BDNF and NGF in the commitment of pluripotent neural crest cells. Neuron 1991; 6:949–955.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Stemple DL, Anderson DJ. Isolation of a stem cell for neurons and glia from the mammalian neural crest. Cell 1992; 71(6):973–985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Henion PD, Weston JA. Timing and pattern of cell fate restrictions in the neural crest lineage. Development 1997; 124(21):4351–4359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Trentin A, Glavieux-Pardanaud C, Le Douarin NM et al. Self-renewal capacity is a widespread property of various types of neural crest precursor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101(13):4495–4500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Shah NM, Groves AK, Anderson DJ. Alternative neural crest cell fates are instructively promoted by TGF beta superfamily members. Cell 1996; 85(3):331–343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Weston JA, Yoshida H, Robinson V et al. Neural crest and the origin of ectomesenchyme: Neural fold heterogeneity suggests an alternative hypothesis. Dev Dyn 2004; 229(1):118–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Ito K, Sieber-Blum M. In vitro clonal analysis of quail cardiac neural crest development. Dev Biol 1991; 148(1):95–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Youn YH, Feng J, Tessarollo L et al. Neural crest stem cell and cardiac endothelium defects in the TrkC null mouse. Mol Cell Neurosci 2003; 24(1):160–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Morrison SJ, White PM, Zock C et al. Prospective identification, isolation by flow cytometry, and in vivo self-renewal of multipotent mammalian neural crest stem cells. Cell 1999; 96(5):737–749.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Hagedorn L, Suter U, Sommer L. P0 and PMP22 mark a multipotent neural crest-derived cell type that displays community effects in response to TGF-beta family factors. Development 1999; 126(17):3781–3794.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Bixby S, Kruger G, Mosher J et al. Cell-intrinsic differences between stem cells from different regions of the peripheral nervous system regulate the generation of neural diversity. Neuron 2002; 35(4):643–656.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Kruger G, Mosher J, Bixby S et al. Neural crest stem cells persist in the adult gut but undergo changes in self-renewal, neuronal subtype potential, and factor responsiveness. Neuron 2002; 35(4):657–669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Maro GS, Vermeren M, Voiculescu O et al. Neural crest boundary cap cells constitute a source of neuronal and glial cells of the PNS. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7(9):930–938.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Hjerling-Leffler J, Marmigere F, Heglind M et al. The boundary cap: A source of neural crest stem cells that generate multiple sensory neuron subtypes. Development 2005; 132(11):2623–2632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Toma JG, Akhavan M, Fernandes KJ et al. Isolation of multipotent adult stem cells from the dermis of mammalian skin. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3(9):778–784.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Fernandes KJ, McKenzie IA, Mill P et al. A dermal niche for multipotent adult skin-derived precursor cells. Nat Cell Biol 2004; 6(11):1082–1093.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Sieber-Blum M, Grim M. The adult hair follicle: Cradle for pluripotent neural crest stem cells. Birth Defects Res 2004; 72(2): 162–172.Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Sieber-Blum M, Grim M, Hu YF et al. Pluripotent neural crest stem cells in the adult hair follicle. Dev Dyn 2004; 231(2):258–269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Molofsky AV, Pardal R, Iwashita T et al. Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation. Nature 2003; 425(6961):962–967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Paratore C, Goerich DE, Suter U et al. Survival and glial fate acquisition of neural crest cells are regulated by an interplay between the transcription factor Sox10 and extrinsic combinatorial signaling. Development 2001; 128(20):3949–3961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Kim J, Lo L, Dormand E et al. SOX10 maintains multipotency and inhibits neuronal differentiation of neural crest stem cells. Neuron 2003; 38(1):17–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Dupin E, Real C, Glavieux-Pardanaud C et al. Reversal of developmental restrictions in neural crest lineages: Transition from Schwann cells to glial-melanocytic precursors in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 29 2003; 100(9):5229–5233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Real C, Glavieux-Pardanaud C, Vaigot P et al. The instability of the neural crest phenotypes: Schwann cells can differentiate into myofibroblasts. Int J Dev Biol 2005; 49(2–3):151–159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Dupin E, Glavieux C, Vaigot P et al. Endothelin 3 induces the reversion of melanocytes to glia through a neural crest-derived glial-melanocytic progenitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97(14):7882–7887.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Gans C, Northcutt RG. Neural crest and the origin of vertebrates. A new head. Science 1983; 220:268–274.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabeth Dupin
    • 1
  • Sophie Creuzet
    • 1
  • Nicole M. Le Douarin
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Embryologie Cellulaire et MoléculaireCNRS UMR 7128Nogent-sur-Marne CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations