Abstract
In this chapter, we explore customer incentive issues. Time-based competition was first highlighted explicitly in the literature in the late 1980s by Stalk who argued that time has become a significant source of competitive advantage. Since Stalk’s introduction of this paradigm, it has attracted a lot of attentions, and its importance apparently has been recognized. In time-based environment, customers have become more and more sensitive to the range of choices and the degree of responsiveness provided by firms. However, production and consumption happen simultaneously in service production, which makes waiting in queue inevitable. Demand management is an effective way to solve this problem. Since customers’ private information such as delay cost is critical for demand management, a key question is how a firm can provide incentives to its customers so that it is in their interest to truthfully disclose their information.
This chapter seeks to provide a comprehensive review of the literature and explore further research of customer incentive issues. We begin our review of the literature by introduction of some pre-requisite knowledge, including the objective of the firm and the customer’s utility function. Then we discuss the literature of mechanism design and categorize the existing literature into two broad classes: price auction and direct mechanism. In direct mechanism, a customer is required to report his delay cost when he arrives at the firm. Based on his announcement, the firm assigns a priority to him and imposes a corresponding priority toll. Through designing the assignment and pricing rules properly, customers will disclose the truth. There are also some articles referring to price auction. In their settings, customers should bid for priorities when they arrive. The key of price auction is to find the equilibrium bid function.
Most of the literature discusses the problem of priority assignment, i.e., managing demand in the same period. For service enterprises, it is more meaningful to assign demand to different periods. In the third section of this chapter, we present a model with several periods each providing different value. Actually, heterogeneous service is a main reason that results in imbalance between demand and supply. We first obtain the optimal assignment and pricing rules when the firm is omniscient and acts on a centralized administrative basis. Then we prove that this optimal mechanism is also incentive compatible, i.e., the mechanism enables the decentralization of decisions while maintaining optimality. According to the optimal mechanism, high-value periods will serve more customers who are more patient.
We then conclude the chapter with an overall summary and the further research to be carried out in this realm, including models with general delay cost structure and perishable value, integrated capacity decision and real-time decision models.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Afeche, P., and Mendelson, H., 2004, Pricing and priority auctions in queueing systems with a generalized delay cost structure, Management science. 50(7): 869–882.
Balachandran, K.R., 1972, Purchasing priorities in queues, Management Science. 18(5): 319–326.
Becker, G.S., 1965, A theory of the allocation of time, Economic Journal. 75(299): 493–517.
Blackburn, J.D., 1991, Time-based competition: speeding new product development, in: Modern Production Concepts: Theory and Applications, G. Fandel and G. Zapfel, ed., Springer-Verlag, New York.
Bradford, R.M., 1996, Pricing, routing and incentive compatibility in multiserver queues, European Journal of Operational Research. 89(2): 226–236.
Chen, H., and Frank, M., 2004, Monopoly pricing when customers queue, HE Transactions. 36(6): 569–581.
Cox, D., and Smith, W., 1961, Queues, Methuen and Company, Ltd., London.
Dewan, S., and Mendelson, H., 1990, User delay costs and internal pricing for a service facility, Management Science. 36(12): 1502–1517.
Daniels, N.C., and Essaides, G., 1993, Time-based Competition, Economic Intelligence Unit, London.
Edelson, N.M., and Hildebrand, D.K., 1975, Congestion tolls for Poisson queuing processes, Econometrica. 43(1): 81–92.
Gibbons, R., 1992, A Prime in Game Theory, Prentice Hall.
Hiller, F.S., and Gerald J.L., 1990, Introduction to Stochastic Models in Operations Research, 5th. ed., McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Johnson, P.M., 2006, A Glossary of Political Economy Terms; http://www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss.
Kleinrock, L., 1967, Optimum bribing for queue position, Operations Research. 15(2): 304–218.
Kittsteiner T., and Moldovanu, B., 2005, Priority auctions and queue disciplines that depend on processing time, Management Science. 51(2): 236–248.
Lui, F., 1985, An equilibrium queuing model of bribery, Journal of Political Economy. 93(4): 760–781.
Myerson, R.B., 1979, Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem, Econometrica. 47(1): 61–74.
Mendelson, H., 1985, Pricing computer services: queueing effects, Communications of the ACM. 38(3): 312–321.
Mendelson, H., and Whang, S., 1990, Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the M/M/l queue, Operations Research. 38(5): 870–883.
Naor, P., 1969, The regulation of queue size by levying tolls, Econometrica. 37(1): 15–24.
Png, I.P.L., and Reitman, D., 1994, Service time competition, RAND Journal of Economics. 25(4): 619–634.
Porter, M.E., 1980, Generic competitive strategies, in: Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.
Quinn, J.B., Baruch, J.J., and Paquette, P.C., 1987, Scientific American, 257(2): 50.
Sasser, W.E., 1976, Match supply and demand in service industries, Harvard Business Review. 54(6): 133–140.
Stalk, G. Jr., 1988, Time-the next source of competitive advantage, Harvard Business Review. 66(4): 41–51.
Stalk, G. Jr., and Hout, T.M., 1990, Competing Against Time: How Time-based Competition is Reshaping Global Markets, Free Press, New York.
Stidham, S., 1992, Pricing and capacity decisions for a service facility: stability and multiple local optima, Management Science. 38(8): 1121–1139.
Tien, J.M., and Berg, D., 2003, A case for service systems engineering, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering. 12(1): 13–38.
Tucker, R.B., 1991, Managing the Future: Ten Driving Forces of Change for the’ 90s, Putnam, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, J., Zhang, N. (2007). Customer Incentives in Time-Based Environment. In: Hsu, C. (eds) Service Enterprise Integration. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 16. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46364-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46364-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-46361-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-46364-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)