Skip to main content

Classroom-Based Assessment: Possibilities and Pitfalls

  • Chapter
International Handbook of English Language Teaching

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 15))

Abstract

This chapter examines the possibilities and pitfalls of classroom-based English language assessment, drawing on both the language testing and classroom assessment literature in English language education as well as educational assessment more generally. The chapter opens with a brief overview of different contexts for language testing and assessment: external, classroom-based, and second language acquisition research. The second part of the chapter presents research findings that highlight different facets of classroom-based assessment: the different meanings of and purposes for assessment, relationships between formative and summative assessment, approaches and frameworks used in teacher assessment, teacher perceptions and implementation of assessment, and the extent to which conventional measurement paradigms are appropriate for assessing the worth of instructional embedded assessment. These research findings lead into a discussion of current concerns and issues, as well as some of the potential pitfalls associated with classroom-based assessment. The final part of the chapter outlines future directions for the field and highlights some of the challenges for both research and professional practice in relation to classroom-oriented assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arkoudis, S., & O’Loughlin, K. (2004). Tensions between validity and outcomes: Teachers’ assessment of written work of recently arrived immigrant ESL students. Language Testing, 20(3), 284–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the Black Box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education. See also: arg.educ.cam.ac.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. F. 2004. Statistical analysis for language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L., & Cohen, A. (1998). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L., & Palmer A. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, J., & Luoma, S. (1997). Qualitative approaches to test validation. In C. Clapham, & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education: Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment (pp. 275–287). Dordecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. (1998). Testing: Friend or foe? London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Studies. (2000). ESL companion to the English CSF. Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, M., Barratt-Pugh, C., Derewianka, B., House, H., Hudson, C., Lumley, T., & Rohl, M. (1997). How teachers interpret and use national and state assessment frameworks. (Vols. 1–3). Canberra, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, G. (1989). Assessing achievement in the learner-centred curriculum. NCELTR Research Series. Macquarie University Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, G. (1995). (Ed.). Language assessment in action. Research Series. Macquarie University Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, G. (1998). Describing language development: Rating scales and SLA. In L. Bachman, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 112–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, G. (2001). Outcomes-based assessment in practice: Some examples and emerging insights. Language Testing, 18(4), 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 653–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Language Benchmarks. (2000). Canadian language benchmarks 2000: English as a second language for adults. Ottawa, ON: Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapelle, C. (1999). Validity in language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 254–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L., Rogers, T., & Hu, H. (2004). ESL/EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: Purposes, methods and procedures. Language Testing, 21(3), 360–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, C. (2000). Assessment and testing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. (1998). Targeting assessment in the primary classroom. Bristol: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. (2001). Unlocking formative assessment. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. (1997). Introduction: The limits of ethics in language testing. Language Testing, 14(3), 235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C. (2004). The contradictory culture of teacher-based assessment: ESL teacher assessment practices in Australian and Hong Kong secondary schools. Language Testing, 20(3), 304–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C., & Tang, R. (2001, February). The contradictory culture of school-based assessment: Teacher assessment practices in Hong Kong and Australia. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics, St Louis, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C., & Williams, A. (Eds.). (2001). Learning from each other: Literacy, labels and limitations. Studies of child English language and literacy development K-12, Vol. 2. Melbourne: Language Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin-Crick, R., Broadfoot, P., & Claxton, G. (2004). Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: The ELLI project. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 247–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelenbos, P., & Kubanek-German, A. (2004). Teacher assessment: The concept of ‘diagnostic competence’. Language Testing, 21(3), 259–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S., & Rea-Dickins, P. (2002). Focus on language sampling: A key issue in EAL assessment. London: National Association for Language Development in the Curriculum (NALDIC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesee, F., & Upshur, J. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis in language testing research (Vol. 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, M. (1995). Classroom-based assessment in intensive English centres. In G. Brindley (Ed.), Language assessment in action (pp. 239–270). Macquarie University Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L. (1997). Washback, impact and validity: Ethical concerns. Language Testing, 14(3), 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice, theory, and research. Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education, 4(3), 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huerta-Macías, A. (1995). Alternative assessment: Responses to commonly asked questions. TESOL Journal, 5, 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. (1990). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karavas-Doukas, K., & Rea-Dickins, P. (1997). (Compilers.). Evaluating innovation and establishing research priorities. Euroconference Proceedings. University of Warwick: Centre for English Language Teacher Education. (Contact: P.Rea-Dickins@bristol.ac.uk).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubanek-German, A. (1997). Modern foreign languages in German primary schools: a case study. In K. Karavas & P. Rea-Dickins (Compilers.), 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunnan, A. (1998). (Ed.). Validation in language assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. (2001b, February). Working with pupil talk: Assumptions and stances in teacher assessment of spoken interaction in the mainstream classroom. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics, St Louis, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. (2002, April). Validity as social construction—Stability and flux. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Arlington, VA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. (2005). Classroom teacher assessment of second language development: Construct as practice. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language learning and teaching. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C., & Mohan, B. (2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: Assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing, 21(3), 335–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, B. (2001). Rethinking assessment from a critical perspective. Language Testing, 18(4), 351–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, B. (2003). Language assessment and programme evaluation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, P. (2000). On ESL standards for school-age learners. Language Testing, 17(2), 185–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. (1998). Policy and social considerations in language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 304–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4), 333–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.) (pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. 2002. Design and analysis in task-based language assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia. (1994). ESL development: Language and literacy in schools (Vol. 1). Canberra: The National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Loughlin, K. (2001). The equivalence of direct and semi-direct speaking tests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, B. (2002). Learner acquaintanceship and oral proficiency test pair-task performance. Language Testing, 19(3), 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, B., Weir, C., & Saville, N. (2002). Using observation checklists to validate speaking-test tasks. Language Testing, 19(1), 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purpura, J. (1999). Learner strategy use and performance on language tests: A structural equation modelling approach (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). (2000). A language in common.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, J., & Chapelle, C. (2001). A framework for second language vocabulary assessment. Language Testing, 18(1), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea-Dickins, P., & Gardner, S. (2000). Snares and silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing, 17(2), 215–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing, 18(4), 429–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea-Dickins, P. (2002). Exploring the educational potential of assessment with reference to learners with English as an additional language. In C. Leung (Ed.), Language and additional/second language issues for school education: A reader for teachers (pp. 81–93). York: York Publishing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea-Dickins, P. (2003a). Classroom Assessment of English as an Additional Language: Key Stage 1 Contexts. End of Project Report for ESRC Major Research Grant R000238196, 1999–2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea-Dickins, P. (2003b, September). Framing assessment: Breaking the mould. Plenary Paper presented at TESOL Symposium on ESL/EFL Standards for Young Learners, University of Rome. Alexandria, Virginia: TESOL, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: A learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea-Dickins, P., & Rixon, S. (1999). Assessment of young learners’ English—Reasons and means. In S. Rixon (Ed.), Young learners of English: Some research perspectives (pp. 89–101). Addison Wesley Longman/The British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J., Glas, C., & Thomas, S. (2003). Educational evaluation, assessment and monitoring: A systemic approach. Lisse, Abingdon, Exton (PA), Tokyo: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. (2005). Washback in the UK primary context with EAL learners: Exploratory case studies. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Bristol: Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K., & Erduran, S. (2004). Learning from international frameworks for assessment: EAL descriptors in Australia and the USA. Language Testing, 21(3), 409–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (1994). The role of language tests in the construction of second-language acquisition theories. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 133–42). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (1998). Applying a multiplism approach. In E. Li & G. James (Eds.), Testing and evaluation in second language education. Hong Kong: Language Centre, The University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (2000). The relationship between language testing and second language acquisition revisited. System, 28, 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (2001a). Democratic assessment as an alternative. Language Testing, 18(4), 373–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (2001b). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence-Brown, R. (2001). The eye of the beholder: Authenticity in an embedded assessment task. Language Testing, 18(4), 463–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (1995). Measured words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, A., & Leung, C. (2000). Teacher assessment and psychometric theory: A case of paradigm crossing. Language Testing, 17(2), 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • TESOL. (1997). ESL standards for pre-K-12. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 389–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valette, R. (1994). Teaching, testing and assessment: Conceptualizing the relationship. In C. Hancock (Ed.), Teaching, testing and assessment: Making the connection (pp. 1–42). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, P., & Winter, J. with Broadfoot, P., Hinett, K., McNess, E., Tidmarsh, C., Triggs, P., & Wilmut (September 1999). The LEARN Project: Learners’ Expectations of Assessment for Learning Nationally. Report for the Qualifications & Curriculum Authority. Bristol: Graduate School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, C. (1993). Understanding and developing language tests. Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2001). An overview of the relationship between assessment and the curriculum. Scott, D. (Eds.). Curriculum and assessment. (pp. 165–181). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rea-Dickins, P. (2007). Classroom-Based Assessment: Possibilities and Pitfalls. In: Cummins, J., Davison, C. (eds) International Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics