Abstract
Amazingly no standard exists for belay devices used in rock or ice climbing. This paper presents an analysis performed on several belay devices that permits their comparison in terms of characteristics and efficiency. The belay device characterization consists in testing the brakes in the case of a given fall arrest in a testing room. Here, a belay device is characterized by its braking coefficient, the rope slip through the brake till the arrest of the fall and the impact load on the last runner. The braking coefficient is the ratio between the rope tensions on the tight and slack sides of the belay device. A device called “virtual hand” has been developed, it tries to reproduce the belayer hand action on the rope during the fall arrest, and it also enables the measurement of the load on the brake and the control of the rope tension on the belayer hand side. The fall arrest intensity or brutality is evaluated from the measurements of the rope slip in the brake and the load on the last runner. The analysis of the three measured characteristics enables the comparison of the six belay devices tested. It appears that these three quantities are related, indeed the larger the braking coefficient the lower the rope slip and the higher the impact load. The energy of the fall is absorbed over a shorter time period for belay device having a high braking coefficient. Therefore, an efficient braking gives way to a high impact force on the climber and a more brutal arrest of the fall. A basic model for the brake has been implemented in an already developed climber fall arrest model. Comparison of experimental and numerical results is made and is satisfactorily.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bedogni, V. (2002) Computer mathematical models in belaying techniques, Report Italian Alpine Club.
Blackford, J., Maycock, E. (2001) Mountaineering Equipment — Ropes Harnesses, Karabiners and Anchors, Materials World Vol. 9 no. 8, pp. 8–12 Special European Supplement.
Manin, L., Mahfoudh, J., Jauffres, D., Richard, M. (2005) Modeling the climber fall arrest dynamics, 5th International Conference on Multibody Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Control, ASME, Long Beach, USA, Sept.
Pavier, M. (1996) Derivation of a rope behavior model for the analysis of forces developed during a rock climbing leader fall, The Engineering of Sport, Haake S., pp.271–279.
Pavier, M. (1998) Experimental and theoretical simulations of climbing falls, Sports Engineering, pp. 79–91.
Schad, R. (2000) Analysis of climbing accident, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp. 391–396.
Smith, R. (1996), The development of protection systems for rock climbing, The Engineering of Sport, Haake S., 1996, pp229–238.
Zanantoni, C. (2000), Analysis of belaying techniques: A typical UIAA Activity, World Mountaineering and Climbing, The Journal of the UIAA, no. 3, pp. 7–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this paper
Cite this paper
Manin, L., Richard, M., Brabant, JD., Bissuel, M. (2006). Rock Climbing Belay Device Analysis, Experiments and Modeling. In: Moritz, E.F., Haake, S. (eds) The Engineering of Sport 6. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46050-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46050-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-31773-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-46050-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)