Skip to main content

Is There Something Wrong? Validity and Bias

  • Chapter
A Pocket Guide to Epidemiology
  • 3998 Accesses

Abstract

The primary objective of most epidemiologic research is to obtain a valid estimate of an effect measure of interest. In this chapter we illustrate three general types of validity problems, distinguish validity from precision, introduce the term bias, and discuss how to adjust for bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berkson J. Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis to hospital data. Biometrics Bulletin 1946;2: 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett SJ, Rubin GL, Curry GK, Kleinbaum DG. The health effects of swimming at Sydney Beaches. The Sydney Beach Users Study Advisory Group. Am J Public Health. 1993;83(12): 1701–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg RS, Daniels SR, Flanders WD, Eley JW, Boring JR. Medical Epidemiology (3rd Ed). Lange Medical Books, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill H, Kleinbaum DG. Bias in Observational Studies. In Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, pp 323–329, Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR. Alternative analytic methods for case-control studies of estrogens and endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med 1978;299(20):1089–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods. John Wiley and Sons Publishers, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perera FP, et al. Biologic markers in risk assessment for environmental carcinogens. Environ Health Persp 1991;90:247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results: II. The relationship of coronary heart disease to cholesterol lowering. JAMA 1984;251(2):365–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner L, Clay-Warner J, Boles J, Williamson J. Assessing condom use practices. Implications for evaluating method and user effectiveness. Sex Transm Dis 1998; 25(6):273–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Is There Something Wrong? Validity and Bias. In: A Pocket Guide to Epidemiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45966-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45966-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-45964-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-45966-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics