Exploring the Temporal Effects of Seasonal Water Availability on the Snail Kite of Florida



The Florida snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis) is an endangered raptor that occurs as an isolated population, currently of about 2,000 birds, in the wetlands of southern and central Florida, USA. Its exclusive prey species, the apple snail (Pomacea paludosa) is strongly influenced by seasonal changes in water abundance. Droughts during the snail kite breeding season have a direct negative effect on snail kite survival and reproduction, but droughts are also needed to maintain aquatic vegetation types favorable to snail kite foraging for snails. We used a spatially explicit matrix model to explore the effects of temporal variation in water levels on the viability of the snail kite population under different temporal drought regimes in its wetland breeding habitat. We focused on three aspects of variations in water levels that were likely to affect kites: (1) drought frequency; (2) drought duration; and (3) drought timing within the year. We modeled a 31-year historical scenario using four different scenarios in which the average water level was maintained constant, but the amplitude of water level fluctuations was modified. Our results reveal the complexity of the effects of temporal variation in water levels on snail kite population dynamics. Management implications of these results are discussed. In particular, management decisions should not be based on annual mean water levels alone, but must consider the intra-annual variability.


Water Level Population Growth Rate Drought Duration Water Level Variation Average Water Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beissinger, S.R. 1995. Modelling extinction in periodic environments: Everglades water levels and snail kite population viability. Ecological Applications 5:618–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennetts, R.E., and Kitchens, W.M. 1997. The demography and movements of snail kites in Florida. United States Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Technical report No. 56, Gainesville, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Bennetts, R.E., Link, W.A., Sauer, J.R., and Sykes, P.W. Jr. 1999. Factors influencing counts in an annual survey of Snail Kites in Florida. Auk 116:316–323.Google Scholar
  4. Bennetts, R.E., and Kitchens, W.M. 2000. Factors influencing movement probabilities of a nomadic food specialist: Proximate foraging benefits or ultimate gains from exploration? Oikos 91:459–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennetts, R.E., Kitchens, W.M., and DeAngelis, D.L. 1998. Recovery of the Snail Kite in Florida: Beyond a reductionist paradigm. Pages 486–508 in Wadworth, K.G., ed. Transactions of the 63rd North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference. Washington, D.C., USA: Wildlife Management Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Curnutt, J.L., Comiskey, E.J., Nott, M.P., and Gross, L.J. 2000. Landscape-based spatially explicit species index models for Everglades restoration. Ecological Applications 10:1849–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darby, P.C. 1998. Florida apple snail (Pomacea paludosa) life history in the context of a hydrologically fluctuating environment. PhD Thesis. Gainesville FL, USA: University of Florida.Google Scholar
  8. Darby, P.C., Karunaratne, L.B., and Bennetts, R.E. 2005. The influence of hydrology and associated habitat structure on spatial and temporal patterns of apple snail abundance and recruitment. University of West Florida/ US Geological Survey. Technical Report. Page 56, Pensacola, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  9. DeAngelis, D.L., Mooij, W.M., Nott, M.P., and Bennetts, R.E. 2001. Individual-based models: Tracking variability among individuals. Pages 171–195 in Shenk, T.M., and Franklin, A.B., eds. Modelling in Natural Resource Management: Valid Development, Interpretation and Application. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  10. DeAngelis, D.L., Trexler, J.C., and Loftus, W.F. 2005. Life history trade-offs and community dynamics of small fishes in a seasonally pulsed wetland. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62:781–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dreitz, V.J., Nichols, J.D., Hines, J.E., Bennetts, R.E., Kitchens, W.M., and DeAngelis, D.L. 2002. The use of resighting data to estimate the rate of population growth of the snail kite in Florida. Journal of Applied Statistics 29:609–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fennema, R.J., Neidraueuer, C.J., Johnson, R.A., MacVicar, T.K., and Perkins, W.A. 1994. A computer model to simulate natural Everglades hydrology. Pages 249–289 in Davis, S., and Ogden, J., eds. Everglades: The Ecosystem and Its Restoration. Delray Beach FL, USA: St Lucie Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gaff, H., DeAngelis, D.L., Gross, L.J., Salinas, R., and Shorrosh, M. 2000. A dynamic landscape model for fish in the Everglades and its application to restoration. Ecological Modelling 127:33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jonze, N., Wilcox, C., and Possingham, H.P. 2004. Habitat selection and population regulation in temporally fluctuating environments. American Naturalist 164:E104–E114.Google Scholar
  15. Kitchens, W.M., Bennetts, R.E., and DeAngelis, D.L. 2002. Linkages between the Snail Kite population and the wetland dynamics in a highly fragmented South Florida Hydroscape. Pages 183–203 in Porter, J.W., and Porter, K.G., eds. The Everglades, Florida Bay, and Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys. Boca Raton FL, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mooij, W.M., Bennetts, R.E., Kitchens, W.M., and DeAngelis, D.L. 2002. Exploring the effect of drought extent and interval on the Florida snail kite: Interplay between spatial and temporal scales. Ecological Modelling 149:25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations


There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations