Initiating e-Participation Through a Knowledge Working Network

  • Louise Rasmussen
  • Elisabeth Davenport
  • Keith Horton
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 226)


The authors present a study of e-participation within a public sector agency (PSA), where a number of knowledge management initiatives have been introduced since the inception of the UK ‘Modernising government’ programme of 1999. The agency has attempted to set up an internal participatory infrastructure to manage ‘knowledge’ across the network of local enterprise companies through which agency policy is operationalised. The trajectory of knowledge management versions in PSA is thus a rich indicator of power-plays in the organisation, and the discussion uses discourse analysis to explore the document base (field notes, textual data paper and electronic, formal and informal) that was produced at three historical moments. The aim is to understand patterns of participation and resistance in a number of e-initiatives within the agency. The authors highlight the choices relating to the stimulating, fostering, encouraging, embracing, contesting, ignoring, and perhaps rejecting of this e-participation project. Such insights are important to our understanding of the influences upon e-governmental initiatives, an area of UK public spending that is littered with IT project failures.


  1. 1.
    OECD, Citizens as partners: information, consultation and public participation in policy-making (OECD, Paris, 2001).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    OECD, Promises and problems on e-democracy: challenges of online citizen engagement. (OECD, Paris, 2003).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. P. Willcocks, Michel Foucault in the social study of ICTs: critique and reappraisal. Department of Information Systems Working Paper Series, 138 (London School of Economics and Political Science, London, 2006).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    U. Schultze and C. Stabell, Knowing What You Don’t Know? Discourses and Contradictions in KM Research, Journal of Management Studies 41(4), 449–573 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Maybin, Language Struggle and Voice: The Bahktin & Volosinov Writings, in: Discourse Theory and Practice: A reader, edited by M. Wetherell et al,. (Sage, London, 2001), pp. 64–71.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge and the discourse on language (A. M. Sheridan Smith trans.) (Pantheon Books, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Vintage, New York, 1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, Michel Foucault: beyond Structualism and Hermeneutics (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982), pp. 208–226.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Flyvbjerg, Making Social Science Matter (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2001).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Grant, G. Michelson et al., Guest editorial: discourse and organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management 18(1), 6–15 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Fairclough, Analysing Discourse. Textual analysis for social research (Routledge, London, 2003).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. D. Introna, Disciplining Information Systems: Truth and its Regimes, European Journal of Information Systems 12, 235–240 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    U. Schultze and D. Leidner, Studying KM in Information Systems Research: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions, MIS Quarterly 20(3), 213–242 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. von Krogh, J. Roos et al., Knowing in Firms. Understanding, Managing and Measuring Knowledge. (Sage Publications Ltd, London, 1998).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. C. Rumizen, The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Knowledge Management (CWL Publishing Enterprises, Indianapolis, 2002).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Carter and H. Scarborough, Towards a second generation of KM? The people management challenge, Education and Trainiung 43(4/5), 215–224 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Wenger, R. McDermott, et al., A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Cultivating Communities of Practice (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, (2002).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Teigland, Knowledge Networking: Structure and Performance in Networks of Practice (Gotab, Stockholm, Sweden, (2003).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. K. Yin, Case Study Research Design and Methods (Sage Publications Ltd., London, 2003).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions (Sage Publications Ltd., London, 1998).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. Czarniawska, On Time, Space, and Action Nets, Organization 11(6), 773–791 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Davenport and K. Horton A social-shaping perspective on an eGovernmental system(ic) failure, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science volume 3183: Electronic Government: Third International Conference, EGOV’04, Zaragoza, Spain, August 30–September 3, 2004 (Springer, Berlin / Heidelberg, 2004), pp. 186–193.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Lamb and R. Kling, Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quartery 27(2), 197–235 (2003).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    The Economist, A harsh master: Public sector IT projects (12 March,2005), p.38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Rasmussen
    • 1
  • Elisabeth Davenport
    • 1
  • Keith Horton
    • 1
  1. 1.International Teledemocracy Centre & School of ComputingNapier UniversityEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations