ICT in Medicine and Health Care: Assessing Social, Ethical and Legal Issues

  • Goran Collste
  • Penny Duquenoy
  • Carlisle George
  • Karin Hedström
  • Kai Kimppa
  • Emilio Mordini
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 223)

Abstract

Continuous developments in information and communication technologies (ICT) have resulted in an increasing use of these technologies in the practice of medicine and in the provision of medical care. This paper presents a series of perspectives from different areas of expertise on some of the ways in which ICT has changed the social picture in respect of the practice of medicine. The aim of the paper is to provide a context for further debate, in the form of a Panel Session, where the issue of Human Choice and Computing can be discussed with reference to a set of specific scenarios. The authors of this paper represent a wide variety of disciplines including law, ethics, medicine, philosophy and computer science, thus bringing a broad perspective to begin the discussions. The aim of the session is to provoke further discussion, encouraging input from other disciplines respresented by the participants, with a view to identifying the level of human choice in a social arena, which has at its heart a vulnerable community. In this environment, and in this era, the ‘social’ in social informatics has never been more important.

Keywords

social impact medical informatics online healthcare 

References

  1. Bashshur, L (1995) On the definition and evaluation of telemedicine. Telemed J 1995; 1:19–30.Google Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, T L & Childress, J F, (1989). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, E. (1997). Managing Diffracted Rationalities: IT in a Home Assistance Service. Technology and Democracy: Gender, Technology and Politics in Transition? Moser, I. and Aas, G.H., Eds, Centre for Technology and Culture, University of Oslo, Oslo: 109–132.Google Scholar
  4. EU Project: WEALTHY. Source: Virtual Medical Worlds, Monthly Newsletter. http://www.hoise.com/vmw/05/articles/vmw/LV-VM-06-05-37.html. (06/12/2005)Google Scholar
  5. Fleming, Nic. ‘Mobile phone link reduces chance of diabetes problems’ 29/08/2005 at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news. (06/12/2005)Google Scholar
  6. Garpenby, P & Hisberg, M, 2000, Hälsoinformation idag och imorgon, CMT Rapport 2000:3, Linktöpings universitet, Linktöping (unpublished)Google Scholar
  7. Hodge, J, Gostin, L and Jacobson, P (1999). Legal issues concerning electronic Health information: Privacy, Quality and Liability. JAMA October 20, 1999, Vol 282, No 15.Google Scholar
  8. Kahan, S, Seftel A and Resnick, M (2000) Sildenafil and the Internet. The Journal of Urology,Vol. 163, 919–923, March 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lahtiranta, J. & Kimppa, K. (2004) Telemedicine and responsibility: why anthropomorphism and consent issues muddle the picture. The 5th International We-B (Working For EBusiness) conference, 25–26 November, Perth, Western Australia.Google Scholar
  10. Parker, M & Muir Gray, J A (2001). What is the role of clinical ethics support in the era of emedicine?, Journal of Medical Ethics, 2001; 27, suppl I:i 33–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pellegrino, E D & Thomasma, D C, 1981 A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice, Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Pollack, Martha E. (2005) ‘Intelligent Technology for an Aging Population’ A1 Magazine,Vo1.26:2, Summer 2005.Google Scholar
  13. Silberg, W M, Lundberg, G D, Musacchio, R A (1997) Assessing, Controlling, and Assuring the Quality of Medical Information on the Internet, Journal of American Medical Association, 277: 1244–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Spielberg, A (1998) On Call and Online, JAMA October 21, 1998, Vol280, No 15.Google Scholar
  15. Wilson, M. (2002). ‘Making nursing visible? Gender, technology and the care plan as script’. Information Technology & People 15(2): 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Goran Collste
  • Penny Duquenoy
    • 1
  • Carlisle George
    • 1
  • Karin Hedström
    • 2
  • Kai Kimppa
    • 3
  • Emilio Mordini
    • 4
  1. 1.Middlesex UniversityUK
  2. 2.Örebro UniversitySweden
  3. 3.University of TurkuFinland
  4. 4.Centre for Science, Society and CitizenshipItaly

Personalised recommendations