Abstract
The most interesting case in regulation of non-food agricultural biotechnology products is the manufacture of novel pharmaceutical and industrial products. The current regulatory situation in the United States has arisen out of a political economy driven largely by the food industry’s risk exposure. Yet, the resulting “zero tolerance” regulatory situation appears inefficient and unstable: set up for another incident such as befell Aventis and ProdiGene. The regulatory situation could be resolved by taking dissemination and susceptibility characteristics into account in setting containment requirements, including threshold allowances in the case of minor breaches of containment. A workable regulatory regime will need to be driven by major agricultural states’ political interests, along with the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, and mindful of the interests of the food industry. Countries intent on developing their domestic biotechnology industry might attract investment by providing a workable regulatory regime that ensures lower risk at lower cost.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
bio-era. 2004a. “Crop Biomanufacturing, Part 1: The Economic Opportunity.” Bio Economic Research Associates (bio-era), Cambridge, MA (36pp).
____. 2004b. “Crop Biomanufacturing, Part 2: Implications for the Farm Sector.” Bio Economic Research Associates (bio-era), Cambridge, MA (14pp).
Fox, J.L. 2003. “Puzzling Industry Response to ProdiGene Fiasco.” Nature Biotechnology 21(1): 3–4.
Lichtenberg, E. 2006. “Regulation of Technology in the Context of Risk Generation.” In R.E. Just, J.M. Alston, and D. Zilberman, eds., Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy. New York: Springer.
Porter, M.E. 1998. “Clusters and the New Economics of Competition.” Harvard Business Review 76(6): 77–90.
Stewart, P. A., and W. McLean. 2004. “Fear and Hope over the Third Generation of Agricultural Biotechnology: Analysis of Public Response in the Federal Register.” AgBioForum 7(3): Article 5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Graff, G.D. (2006). Regulation of Transgenic Crops Intended for Pharmaceutical and Industrial Uses. In: Just, R.E., Alston, J.M., Zilberman, D. (eds) Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 30. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36953-2_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36953-2_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-36952-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-36953-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)