Skip to main content

Labeling Regulations and Segregation of First- and Second-Generation GM Products: Innovation Incentives and Welfare Effects

  • Chapter
Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 30))

Abstract

We review some of the most significant issues and results on the economic effects of genetically modified (GM) product innovation, with emphasis on the question of GM labeling and the need for costly segregation and identity preservation activities. The analysis is organized around an explicit model that can accommodate the features of both first-generation and second-generation GM products. The model accounts for the proprietary nature of GM innovations and for the critical role of consumer preferences vis-à-vis GM products, as well as for the impacts of segregation and identity preservation and the effects of a mandatory GM labeling regulation. We also investigate briefly a novel question in this setting, the choice of “research direction” when both cost-reducing and quality-enhancing GM innovations are feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof, G.A. 1970. “The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3): 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, K., L. Hill, B. Wenzel, and R. Hornbaker. 1999. “Alternative Market Channels for Specialty Corn and Soybeans.” Report No. AE-4726, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckwell, A., G. Brookes, and D. Bradley. 1999. “Economics of IP for Genetically Modified Crops.” Report for Food Biotechnology Communication Initiative (FBCI), London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, D., and M. Desquilbet. 2002. “The Economics of Non-GMO Segregation and Identity Preservation.” Food Policy 27(1): 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C, and G.P. Gruère. 2003. “International Approaches to the Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods.” Choices (2nd quarter): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, J.M., and S. Marette. 2003. “ ‘Does Contain’ vs. ‘Does Not Contain’: Does It Matter Which GMO Label Is Used?” European Journal of Law and Economics 16(3): 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union. 2004. “Question and Answers on the Regulation of GMOs in the EU.” MEMO/04/85, European Union, Brussels (April 15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Falck-Zepeda, J.B., G. Traxler, and R.G. Nelson. 2000. “Surplus Distribution from the Introduction of a Biotechnology Innovation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(2): 360–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, M., and K. Giannakas. 2004. “Inserting GM Products into the Food Chain: The Market and Welfare Effects of Different Labeling and Regulatory Regimes,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(1): 42–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furtan, W.H., R.S. Gray, and J.J. Holzman. 2003. “The Optimal Time to License a Biotech ‘Lemon’.” Contemporary Economic Policy 21(4): 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell. G., N. Allum, and S. Stares. 2003. “Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002.” Euro-barometer 58.0. Report to the EC Directorate General for Research (March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Golan, E., F. Kuchler, and L. Mitchell. 2001. “Economics of Food Labeling.” Journal of Consumer Policy 24(2): 117–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. 1981. “The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure about Product Quality.” Journal of Law and Economics 24(3): 461–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, W.E., J.F. Shogren, M. Rousu, and A. Tegene. 2003. “Consumer Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Food Labels in a Market with Diverse Information: Evidence from Experimental Auctions.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 28(3): 481–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. 2005. “Preview: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2004.” 2005. ISAAA Brief No. 32-2004, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J., and J. Tirole. 1993. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapan, H., and G. Moschini. 2001. “GMO Labeling and Trade: Consumer Protection or (Just) Protectionism?” Paper presented at the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium (IATRC) conference entitled “Globalization, Biotechnology and Trade,” Tucson, AZ (December).

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2004. “Innovation and Trade with Endogenous Market Failure: The Case of Genetically Modified Products.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(3): 634–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschini, G., and H. Lapan. 1997. “Intellectual Property Rights and the Welfare Effects of Agricultural R&D.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(4): 1229–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschini, G., H. Lapan, and A. Sobolevsky. 2000. “Roundup Ready Soybeans and Welfare Effects in the Soybean Complex.” Agribusiness 16(1): 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mussa, M., and S. Rosen. 1978. “Monopoly and Product Quality.” Journal of Economics Theory 18(2): 301–317.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Noussair, C, S. Robin, and B. Ruffieux. 2004. “Do Consumers Really Refuse to Buy Genetically Modified Food?” Economic Journal 114(492): 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. 2001. Harvest on the Horizon: Future Uses of Agricultural Biotechnology. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology, Washington, D.C. Available online at http://pewagbiotech.org/research/harvest/harvest.pdf (accessed May 26, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, C.F., and L.A. Jackson. 2000. “Labelling, Trade and Genetically Modified Organisms: A Proposed Solution.” Journal of World Trade 34(1): 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, I. 2002. “Regulation of Biotechnology: Will We Ever ‘Freely’ Trade GMOs?” European Review of Agricultural Economics 29(1): 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, S., and P.W.B. Phillips. 2002. “Product Differentiation Alternatives: Identity Preservation, Segregation and Traceability.” AgBioForum 5(2): 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobolevsky, A., G. Moschini, and H. Lapan. 2005. “Genetically Modified Crops and Product Differentiation: Trade and Welfare Effects in the Soybean Complex.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(3): 621–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, F.J., J. Williams, A. Van Deynze, and K.J. Bradford. 2002. “Identity Preservation of Agricultural Commodities.” Publication No. 8077, Agricultural Biotechnology in California Series, Davis, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.R., and J.S. Tick. 2003. “Post-Market Oversight of Biotech Foods: Is the System Prepared?” Report commissioned by the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology, Washington, D.C., and prepared by Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisl, M.F., and J.A. Caswell. 2003. “Information Policy and Genetically Modified Food: Weighing the Benefits and Costs.” Working Paper No. 2003-1, Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2001. “Voluntary Labeling Indicating Whether Foods Have or Have Not Been Developed Using Bioengineering.” Draft Guidance for Industry (January).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moschini, G., Lapan, H. (2006). Labeling Regulations and Segregation of First- and Second-Generation GM Products: Innovation Incentives and Welfare Effects. In: Just, R.E., Alston, J.M., Zilberman, D. (eds) Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 30. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36953-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics