Skip to main content

Scripting Collaborative Learning Processes: A Cognitive Perspective

  • Chapter
Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning ((CULS,volume 6))

Abstract

Scripting collaborative learning is an effective approach to promoting learning in both face-to-face and on-line computer learning contexts. Although the term script originated in cognitive psychology, it is used in educational contexts to describe ways of structuring interaction and scaffolding collaborative learning through the use of roles, activities, and sequencing of activities. There are several specific types of learning activities that numerous lines of research have shown enhance learning during interaction, however, these activities rarely occur spontaneously during naturally-occurring group collaboration. Also, it is not always clear what individuals learn during collaboration, how they learn it, and the underlying cognitive mechanisms that account for learning collaboratively. Four illustrative approaches to scripting face-to-face collaboration are presented. Each approach is examined to reveal how roles, activities, and sequence of activities, are used to structure collaborative learning and what particular cognitive, metacognitive, and socio-cognitive processes their scripts are intended to induce in learners. The expectation for some scripts is that over time learners will internalize the roles, activities, and sequence; and, once learners can play all of the roles of a script on their own, they will self-regulate their learning without the aid of an external script. However, the wide range of differences in both the complexity and goals of scripts affects their potential for internalization, and some external scripts are not intended to be discontinued even if roles are internalized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearison, D. J. (1982). New directions in studies of social interactions and cognitive growth. In F. C. Serafica (Ed.), Social-cognitive development in context (pp. 199–221). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P. (2004). Promoting students’ argument construction and collaborative debate in the classroom. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 114–144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Van Dusen, L., Glynn, S. M., & Hemphill, D. (1990). The impact of inferences on instructional text. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), Inferences and text comprehension (pp. 53–87). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities. American Psychologist, 41, 1059–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. K. K., Burtis, P. J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Constructive activity in learning from text. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., deLeeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher C. (1994). Eliciting self explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., & VanLehn, K. A. (1991). The content of physics self-explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 69–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (1988). The tensions between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 23, 78–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, D. F. (1988). Cooperative learning strategies. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 103–120). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lisi, R., & Golbeck, S. L. (1999). Implications of piagetian theory for peer learning. In A. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning (pp. 3–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M. L. (1986). Problem-solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C. (1992). Questioning mechanisms during complex learning. Technical report, Cognitive Science Program, Office of Naval Research, Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 431–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 379–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R.T. (1993). Creative and critical thinking through Academic Controversy. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 40–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students’ comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 338–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1997). ASK to THINK-TEL WHY®©: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher-level complex learning, in Educational Psychologist, 32(4), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1998). Transactive peer tutoring: distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning (pp 3–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A., & Rosenshine, B. (1993). Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children’s knowledge construction. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 134–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 287–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, C. O., Dansereau, D. F., Goetz, E. T., & Young, M. D. (1985). Cognitive style and cooperative learning: Transfer of effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. N. (1932). Studies in the cultural development of the child, 3: The development of vocabulary attention in the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 37, 52–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M. R., Aspinwall, L. G., Mumme, D. L., & Chabay, R. W. (1990). Self-perception and social perception processes in tutoring: Subtle social control strategies of expert tutors. In Self-inference processes: The Ontario Symposium (pp. 217–237). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1928). The problem of the cultural behavior of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 35, 493–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugny, G., & Doise, W. (1978). Socio-cognitive conflict and the structure of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. & Miller, N. (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120–141). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (1999). Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons from three research programs. In A. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning (pp. 151–177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret-Clermont, A. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibrium of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., McDaniel, M. A., Turnure, J. E., Wood, E., & Ahmad, M. (1987). Generation and precision of elaboration: Effects on intentional and incidental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Symons, S., McDaniel, M. A., Snyder, B. L., & Turnure, J. E. (1988). Elaborative interrogation facilitates acquisition of confusing facts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 268–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V. King, A., & Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaboration: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1997). No distribution without individuals’ cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111–138). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C, & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understandings. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurlin, J. E., Dansereau, D. E., Larson, C. O., & Brooks, C. W. (1984). Cooperative learning strategies in processing descriptive text: Effects of role and activity level of the learner. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 451–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Education (1986). What works: Research about teaching and learning. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan J. L., & Estes, T. H. (1986). Reading and reasoning beyond the primary grades. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, P. (1985). Cooperative learning: A study on processes and effects of cooperation between primary school children. Gronigen, The Netherlands: University of Gronigen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N., Ender, P., & Lewis, S. (1986). Problem solving strategies and group processes in small group learning computer programming. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N., & Farivar, S. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 369–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Cafree (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Simon & Shuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering computer-supported collaboration with cooperation scripts and scaffolds. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations of a CSCL community (pp. 573–574). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L. (1995). Argument and deliberation: A plea for understanding. Journal of Philosophy, 92, 565–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

King, A. (2007). Scripting Collaborative Learning Processes: A Cognitive Perspective. In: Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., Haake, J.M. (eds) Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics