Abstract
Scripting collaborative learning is an effective approach to promoting learning in both face-to-face and on-line computer learning contexts. Although the term script originated in cognitive psychology, it is used in educational contexts to describe ways of structuring interaction and scaffolding collaborative learning through the use of roles, activities, and sequencing of activities. There are several specific types of learning activities that numerous lines of research have shown enhance learning during interaction, however, these activities rarely occur spontaneously during naturally-occurring group collaboration. Also, it is not always clear what individuals learn during collaboration, how they learn it, and the underlying cognitive mechanisms that account for learning collaboratively. Four illustrative approaches to scripting face-to-face collaboration are presented. Each approach is examined to reveal how roles, activities, and sequence of activities, are used to structure collaborative learning and what particular cognitive, metacognitive, and socio-cognitive processes their scripts are intended to induce in learners. The expectation for some scripts is that over time learners will internalize the roles, activities, and sequence; and, once learners can play all of the roles of a script on their own, they will self-regulate their learning without the aid of an external script. However, the wide range of differences in both the complexity and goals of scripts affects their potential for internalization, and some external scripts are not intended to be discontinued even if roles are internalized.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593–604.
Bearison, D. J. (1982). New directions in studies of social interactions and cognitive growth. In F. C. Serafica (Ed.), Social-cognitive development in context (pp. 199–221). New York: Guilford.
Bell, P. (2004). Promoting students’ argument construction and collaborative debate in the classroom. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 114–144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Britton, B. K., Van Dusen, L., Glynn, S. M., & Hemphill, D. (1990). The impact of inferences on instructional text. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), Inferences and text comprehension (pp. 53–87). San Diego: Academic Press.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities. American Psychologist, 41, 1059–1068.
Chan, C. K. K., Burtis, P. J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Constructive activity in learning from text. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 97–118.
Chi, M. T. H., deLeeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher C. (1994). Eliciting self explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
Chi, M. T. H., & VanLehn, K. A. (1991). The content of physics self-explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 69–105.
Cobb, P. (1988). The tensions between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 23, 78–103.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35.
Dansereau, D. F. (1988). Cooperative learning strategies. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 103–120). New York: Academic Press.
De Lisi, R., & Golbeck, S. L. (1999). Implications of piagetian theory for peer learning. In A. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning (pp. 3–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gick, M. L. (1986). Problem-solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 99–120.
Graesser, A. C. (1992). Questioning mechanisms during complex learning. Technical report, Cognitive Science Program, Office of Naval Research, Arlington.
Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 431–473.
Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 379–432.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R.T. (1993). Creative and critical thinking through Academic Controversy. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 40–53
Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147–172.
King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students’ comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 1–16.
King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 307–317.
King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 338–368.
King, A. (1997). ASK to THINK-TEL WHY®©: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher-level complex learning, in Educational Psychologist, 32(4), 221–235.
King, A. (1998). Transactive peer tutoring: distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 57–74.
King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning (pp 3–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
King, A., & Rosenshine, B. (1993). Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children’s knowledge construction. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 127–148.
King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 134–152.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 287–315.
Larson, C. O., Dansereau, D. F., Goetz, E. T., & Young, M. D. (1985). Cognitive style and cooperative learning: Transfer of effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1932). Studies in the cultural development of the child, 3: The development of vocabulary attention in the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 37, 52–81.
Lepper, M. R., Aspinwall, L. G., Mumme, D. L., & Chabay, R. W. (1990). Self-perception and social perception processes in tutoring: Subtle social control strategies of expert tutors. In Self-inference processes: The Ontario Symposium (pp. 217–237). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Luria, A. R. (1928). The problem of the cultural behavior of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 35, 493–506.
Mugny, G., & Doise, W. (1978). Socio-cognitive conflict and the structure of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 181–192.
O’Donnell, A., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. & Miller, N. (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120–141). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (1999). Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons from three research programs. In A. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning (pp. 151–177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perret-Clermont, A. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. New York: Academic Press.
Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibrium of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pressley, M., McDaniel, M. A., Turnure, J. E., Wood, E., & Ahmad, M. (1987). Generation and precision of elaboration: Effects on intentional and incidental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 291–300.
Pressley, M., Symons, S., McDaniel, M. A., Snyder, B. L., & Turnure, J. E. (1988). Elaborative interrogation facilitates acquisition of confusing facts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 268–278.
Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V. King, A., & Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 91–109.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaboration: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235–276.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.
Salomon, G. (1997). No distribution without individuals’ cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111–138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89–99.
Schank, R. C, & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understandings. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spurlin, J. E., Dansereau, D. E., Larson, C. O., & Brooks, C. W. (1984). Cooperative learning strategies in processing descriptive text: Effects of role and activity level of the learner. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 451–463.
U. S. Department of Education (1986). What works: Research about teaching and learning. Washington, DC.
Vaughan J. L., & Estes, T. H. (1986). Reading and reasoning beyond the primary grades. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Vedder, P. (1985). Cooperative learning: A study on processes and effects of cooperation between primary school children. Gronigen, The Netherlands: University of Gronigen.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39.
Webb, N., Ender, P., & Lewis, S. (1986). Problem solving strategies and group processes in small group learning computer programming. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 243–251.
Webb, N., & Farivar, S. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 369–395.
Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Cafree (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Simon & Shuster Macmillan.
Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering computer-supported collaboration with cooperation scripts and scaffolds. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations of a CSCL community (pp. 573–574). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wright, L. (1995). Argument and deliberation: A plea for understanding. Journal of Philosophy, 92, 565–585.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
King, A. (2007). Scripting Collaborative Learning Processes: A Cognitive Perspective. In: Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., Haake, J.M. (eds) Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-36947-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-36949-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)