Advertisement

Discussion

Scripting Group Cognition The Problem of Guiding Situated Collaboration
  • Gerry Stahl
Part of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning book series (CULS, volume 6)

Abstract

The concept of scripts has considerable appeal as addressing or at least naming an urgent issue in CSCL: how to use the promise of networked computers to guide groups of students to engage in desirable and successful collaborative learning. However, the concept of scripts is often applied inconsistently or founded on problematic theoretical grounds. Reconceptualizing scripts as situated resources rather than implementable plans for action is therefore undertaken here to align the concept with current socio-cultural thought. Studying how such a resource is made sense of in detailed interactions is then recommended for studying how scripts can be designed to guide situated collaboration.

Keywords

Group Cognition Dyad Member Situate Resource CSCL Script Implementable Plan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. Mckinney & E. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337–366). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  3. Livingston, E. (1995). An anthropology of reading. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Marx, K. (1867/1976). Capital (B. Fowkes, Trans. Vol. I). New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
  5. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Schank, R., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Schwartz, D. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3), 321–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Suchman, L, (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Vygotsky, L. (1930/1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerry Stahl
    • 1
  1. 1.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations