The concept of scripts has considerable appeal as addressing or at least naming an urgent issue in CSCL: how to use the promise of networked computers to guide groups of students to engage in desirable and successful collaborative learning. However, the concept of scripts is often applied inconsistently or founded on problematic theoretical grounds. Reconceptualizing scripts as situated resources rather than implementable plans for action is therefore undertaken here to align the concept with current socio-cultural thought. Studying how such a resource is made sense of in detailed interactions is then recommended for studying how scripts can be designed to guide situated collaboration.
KeywordsGroup Cognition Dyad Member Situate Resource CSCL Script Implementable Plan
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. Mckinney & E. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337–366). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Livingston, E. (1995). An anthropology of reading. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Marx, K. (1867/1976). Capital (B. Fowkes, Trans. Vol. I). New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Schank, R., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L, (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. (1930/1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar