Skip to main content

The Problem of Herbicide Water Monitoring in Europe

  • Chapter
  • 979 Accesses

Part of the book series: Biotechnology Intelligence Unit ((BIOIU))

Abstract

Among human activities agriculture is one of the principal activities responsible for the damages that can affect water resources. The increase in food production achieved in last decades has been possible mainly because of massive use of fertilizers and pesticides. Data on pesticide pollution are rather scarce; monitoring data on water contamination is based on few investigations, focussing on a limited area and on few compounds of interest. The large number of compounds (approximately 600, which were approved for use) and confidentiality of manufacturers make it difficult to obtain accurate and current information on pesticide application. Herbicides are the second most important class of pesticides used in the European Union. A major difficulty in estimating water quality related to herbicide contamination is due to seasonal changes of field application and low maximum admissible concentration required by European policy. Unfortunately, systematic monitoring is not yet routine in the EU. That is why the data on maximum permissible concentration of herbicides significantly varies among European countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Haskoning N. Danube integrated environmental study. Final report of the EU-Phare environmental programme for the Danube Basin. Haskoning Royal Dutch Consulting Engineers and Architects, Nijmegen: 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stephenson GA, Solomon KR. Pesticides and the environment. Guelph, Ontario: Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. EEA. Groundwater quality and quantity in Europe. Technical Report No. 22. Denmark: European Environmental Agency, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eurostat. Environmental Pressure Indicators for the EU 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eurostat and European Crop Protection Association, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Commission of the European Communities. Towards a thematic strategy on the sustainable use of pesticide. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, Brussels 1.7. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nixon S, Trent Z, Marcuello C et al. Europe’s water: An indicator-based assessment. EEA Topic Report 1/2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wossink GA, Feitshans TA. Pesticides policies in the European Union. Paper presented at the 20th Annual American Agricultural Law Association (AALA), Symposium New Orleans, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eurostat. Environment & Energy, Agriculture, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Redbond M. Agrow’s Complete Guide to Agrochemical Marketing Strategies in the EU. Richmond: PJB Publications, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Triegel E, Guo L. Overview of the fate of pesticides in the environment, water balance; runoff vs. leaching. In: Honeycutt R, Shabacker eds. Mechanisms of Pesticide Movement into Groundwater. Lewis, 1994:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schottler SP, Elsenreich SJ, Capel PD. Atrazine, alachlor and cyanazine in a large agricultural river system. Environ Sci Tech 1994; 28: 1079–1089.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. US-EPA. National Water quality Inventory. Washington DC: 1992 Report to Congress. EPA-841-R-94-001. Office of Water, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. US-PEA. National Pesticide Survey: Update and summary of Phase II results. Washington DC: Office of Water & Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, EPA 570/9-91-021, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ignazi JC. Improving nitrogen management in irrigated, intensely cultivated areas: The approach in France. In: Prevention of Water Pollution by Agriculture and Related Activities. Santiago: Proceedings of the FAO Expert Consultation, 1992. Rome: Water Report 1, FAO, 1993:247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  16. RIVM. The environment in Europe: A global perspective. Netherlands: National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neil W. An evolutionary perspective on pesticide use and water pollution in Europe. Wageningen: Policy Measures to Control Environmental Impacts from Agriculture, 519 Workshop on Pesticides, EU Concert Action AIR3-CT93-1164, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heinz I. Cost and benefits of pesticide reduction in agriculture: Best solutions. In: Grada A, Wossink, et al, eds. Economics of Agro-Chemicals. 1998:333.

    Google Scholar 

  19. EPA. Current Drinking Water Standards, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. WHO. Guidelines for drinking water. Recommendations. 1993:1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. DWI. Drinking Waters 1997. London: The Stationery Office, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Environment Agency. The state of the environment of England and Wales freshwaters. London: The Stationery Office, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Environment Agency. Url: http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/industry/agri/pests/.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Environment Agency. Url: http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/commondata/105385/pests_report_554125.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bichel Committee. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Inea. L’agricoltura italiana conta 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sesia E. Dati di vendita dei prodotti fitosanitari: Elaborazioni per sostanze attive-anno 1998. Gruppo di lavoro ANPA-ARPA-APPA Fitofarmaci. 3 Seminario Fitofarmaci e Ambiente, Napoli 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Franchi A. Controllo dei residui di fitofarmaci nelle acque: Schema di rilevazione dell’attività per la verifica degli obiettivi. Fitofarmaci e ambiente. ARPAT Firenze 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Licia Guzzella .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Landes Bioscience

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guzzella, L., Pozzoni, F. (2006). The Problem of Herbicide Water Monitoring in Europe. In: Biotechnological Applications of Photosynthetic Proteins: Biochips, Biosensors and Biodevices. Biotechnology Intelligence Unit. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36672-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics