Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
Book cover

International Conference on Information Technology for Balanced Automation Systems

BASYS 2006: Information Technology For Balanced Manufacturing Systems pp 5–16Cite as

  1. Home
  2. Information Technology For Balanced Manufacturing Systems
  3. Conference paper
Tool Condition Monitoring in Machining - Neural Networks

Tool Condition Monitoring in Machining - Neural Networks

  • Mo A. Elbestawi1 &
  • Mihaela Dumitrescu1 
  • Conference paper
  • 1409 Accesses

  • 9 Citations

Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT,volume 220)

Abstract

Condition monitoring and diagnosis systems capable of identifying machining system dejects and their location are essential for unmanned machining. Unattended (or minimally manned) machining would resu1t in increased capital equipment utilization, thus substantially reducing the manufacturing costs. A review of tool monitoring systems and techniques and their components and the Multiple Principle Component fuzzy neural network for tool condition monitoring machining are presented.

Keywords

  • Hide Layer
  • Acoustic Emission
  • Tool Condition
  • Fuzzy Neural Network
  • Sensor Fusion

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Chapter PDF

Download to read the full chapter text

5. References

  1. Dornfeld, D. A,. 1986, “Acoustic Emission Monitoring for Untended Manufacturing,” Proceedings. of Japan/USA Symposium, on Flexible Automation, JAACE.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Du, R., Elbestawi, M. A. and Wu, S. M., 1995. “Automated Monitoring of Manufacturing Processes, Part 1: Monitoring Methods,” ASME J. of Eng. for Industry, Vol. 117, pp. 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tonshoff, H. K, and Wulfsberg, J. P., 1988, “Developments and Trends in Monitoring and Control of Machining Processes,” Annals of the CIRP, Vo1.37,No.2, pp. 611–622.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tlusty, J. and Andrews, G. C., 1983, “A Critical Review of Sensors for Unmanned Machining.” Annals of the CIRP, Vol.32, No.2, pp. 563–572.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Iserrmann, R., 1984, “Process Fault Detection Based on Modeling and Estimation Methods-A Survey.” Automatica, Vo1.20,No.4, pp. 387–404.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Dornfeld, D. A,, 1990, “Neural Ketwork Sensor Fusion for Tool Condition Monitoring.” Annals of the CIRP, Vo1.39,No.1, pp. 101–105.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Domfeld, D. A,, 1992; “Monitoring of Machining Process-Literature Review,” Presented at CIRP STC“C” Meeting, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ruokangas, C. C., Blank, M. S., Matin, J. F. and Schoenwald; J. S., 1986. ”Integration of Multiple Sensors to Provide Flexible Control Strategies,” Proceedings of the 1986-IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 947–953.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McClelland, S., 1988. ”Tacking the Problem of Sensor Fusion,” Sensor Review; Vol.8/No.2. pp. 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chryssolouris, G. and Domroese, M., 1988, “Sensor Integration for Tool Wear Estimation in Machining,” Sensors and Control for Manufacturing, ASME PED-Vol. 33, pp. 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chryssolouris, G. and Dornroese, M., 1989, “An Experimental Study of Strategies for Integrating Sensor Information in Machining,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 38,No. I, pp. 425–428.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chryssolouris, G., Domroese, M. and Beaulieu, P., 1992, “Sensor Synthesis for Control of Manufacturing Process,” ASME J, of Engineering for Industry, Vol.114, pp. 158–174.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Endres, W. J., Sutherland, J. W., DeVor, R. E.and Kapoor, S. G., 1990, “A Dynamic Model of the Cutting Force System in the Turning Process,” Monitoring and Control for Manufacturing Process, ASME PED. Vo1.44, pp. 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koren, Y., Ko, T. R., Ulsoy, A. G. and Danai, K., 1991, “Flank Wear EstimationCnder Varying Cutting Conditions,” ASME J.of Engineering for Industry, Vo1.113, pp. 300–307.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koren, Y., 1978, “Flank Wear Model of Cutting Tools Using Control Theory,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, paper No. 77-WA/PROD-20.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koren, Y., Danai, K., Ulsoy, A. G. and Ko, T. R., 1987, “Monitoring Tool Wear Through Force Measurement,” Proceedings of the 15th NAMRI Conference, pp. 463–468.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Matsumoto, Y., Tjinag, N. and Foote, B., 1988, “Tool Wear Monitoring Using A Linear Extrapolation:” Sensors and Control for Manufacturing, ASME-PED Vol. 33, pp.83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, W. Q., Hsieh, S. H. and Wu, S. M., 1982, “Adaptive !Modelling and Characterization for Machining Chatter,” Measurement and Control for Batch Manufacturing, ASME, pp. 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsai, S. Y., Eman, K. F. and Wu, S. M., 1983. ”Chatter Suppression in Turning,” Proceedings of the 11th NAMRC, pp. 399–402.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liang, S. Y. and Dornfeld, D., 1989, “Tool Wear Detection Using Time Series Analysis of Acoustic Emission,” ASME J Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol.111,.pp. 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Takata S. and Sata, T., 1986, “Model Referenced Monitoring and Diagnosis Application to the Manufacturing System.” Computers in Industry, Vol. 7, pp. 31–43

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Du, R., M.A. Elbestawi. and S. Wu (1995, May). Automated Monitoring of Manufacturing Processes, Part 2: Applications. Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 117, pp.133–141

    Google Scholar 

  23. Isermann, R., M. Ayoubi, H. Konrad, and T. Reib (1993). Model Based Detection of Tool Wear and Breakage for Machine Tools. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference System Manufacturing Cybernetics Vol. 3, pp72–77

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lee, B.Y., H.S. Liu, and Y.S. Tarng (1998). Modeling and Optimization of Drilling Process. Journal of Material Processing Technology Vo1.74, pp.149–157

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, Y. Z., Liu, Z. F, Pan, L. X., Liu, Y. J. and Yang, W. B., 1982, “Recognition of the Cutting States for the Difficult-to-Cut Materials Application of the Pattern Recognition Technique,” Annals of the CIRP, Vo1.31,No.1, pp. 97–101

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Marks, J, and Elbestawi, M. A,. 1988. ”Development of Machine Tool Condition Monitoring System Using Pattern Recognition.” Sensors and Controls for Manufacturing, ASME-FED-Vo1.33, pp. 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, T. I. and Wu, S. M., 1988, “On-Line Drill Wear Monitoring.” Sensors and Control for Manufacturing, ASME-PED-Vol. 33._pp. 99–104.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Emmell, E. and Kannatey-Aslbu, E. Jr., 1987, “Tool Failure Monitoring in Turning by Pattern Recognition Analysis of AE Signals,” Sensors for Manufacturing, ASME-PED. Vol.3D, pp. 39–57

    Google Scholar 

  29. Emmell, E. and Kannatey-Asibu, E. Jr.. 1988, “Tool Failure Monitoring in Turning by Pattern Recognition Analysis of AE Signals,” ASME J. of Engineering for Industry, Vol.112, pp. 137–145

    Google Scholar 

  30. Simpson, P. K., 1992, “Fuzzy Min-Max Neural Networks-Part 1: Classification,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 3,No.5, pp 776–786.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. Du, R. X., Elbestawi, M. A. and Li, S., 1992, “Tool Condition Monitoring in Turning Using Fuzzy Set Theory,” International Journal of Machine Tool and Manufacturing, Vol. 32,No.6, pp. 781–796.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Li, S., Elbestawi. M.A. and Du. R.X., 1992, “A Fuzzy Logic Approach for Multi-Sensor Process Monitoring in Machining,” Sensors and Signal Processing for Manufacturing, ASME FED-Vol. 55. pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li, S. and Elbestawi. M. A,. 1994, “Tool Condition Monitoring in Machining by Fuzzy Neural Networks,” Dynamic Systems and Control; ASME-DSC. Vol. 55-2, pp. 1019–1034.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. McMaster University, Canada

    Mo A. Elbestawi & Mihaela Dumitrescu

Authors
  1. Mo A. Elbestawi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mihaela Dumitrescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Cite this paper

Elbestawi, M.A., Dumitrescu, M. (2006). Tool Condition Monitoring in Machining - Neural Networks. In: Information Technology For Balanced Manufacturing Systems. BASYS 2006. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 220. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36594-7_2

Download citation

  • .RIS
  • .ENW
  • .BIB
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36594-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-36590-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-36594-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

167.114.118.210

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature