Skip to main content

Assessing the risk of using vulnerable components

  • Conference paper
Quality of Protection

Part of the book series: Advances in Information Security ((ADIS,volume 23))

Abstract

This paper discusses how information about the architecture and the vulnerabilities affecting a distributed system can be used to quantitatively assess the risk to which the system is exposed. Our approach to risk evaluation can be used to assess how much one should believe in system trustworthiness and to compare different solutions, providing a tool for deciding if the additional cost of a more secure component is worth to be afforded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Christopher Alberts, Audree Dorofee, James Stevens, and Carol Woody. Introduction to the Octave approach, http://www.cert.org/octave/, 2003.

  2. Richard Baskerville. Information system security design methods: Implications for information systems development. ACM Computing Survey, 25(4):375–412, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gautam Biswas, Kenneth A. Debelak, and Kazuhiko Kawamura. Application of qualitative modelling to knoweledge-based risk assessment studies. IEA/AIE ‘89: Second International Conference on Industrial & Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence & Expert Systems-ACM, pages 92–101, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Jenkins. Risk analysis helps establish a good security posture; risk management keeps it that way. whitepaper, pages 1–16, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harvey M. Deitel, Paul J. Deitel, B. DuWaldt, and L. K. Trees. Web Services: A Technical Introduction. Prentice Hall, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zaid Dwaikat and Francesco Parisi-Presicce. Risky trust: Risk-based analysis of software system. Proceedings of the first workshop on Software Engineering for Secure Systems (SESS05).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Evans, D. Heinbuch, E Kyle, J. Piorkowski,and J. Wallener. Risk-based system security engineering: Stopping attacks with intention. IEEE Security & Privacy, pages 59–62, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Network Working Group. Internet security glossary, http://rfc.net/rfc2828.html, May 2000. Request for Comments: 2828.

  9. Michael Howard and David Leblanc. Writing secure Code. Microsoft Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khaled Khan, Jun Han, and Yuliang Zheng. A framework for an active interface to characterize compositional security contracts of software components. 2001 Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWECOl)-IEEE Computer Society Press, pages 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I.S. Moskowitz and M.H. Kang. An insecurity flow model. Proceedings of New Security Paradigms workshop, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Noel, S. Jajoidia, B. O‘Berry, and M. Jacobs. Efficient minimum-cost network hardening via exploit dependency graphs. Proceedings of ACSAC‘03.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Elisabeth Pate-Cornell. Fault tree vs. event trees in reliability analysis. Risk Analysis, 4(3): 177–186, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehmet Sahinoglu. Security meter:a pratical decision-tree model to quantify risk. IEEE Security & Privacy,3(3): 18–24, May/June 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bruce Schneier. Modelling security threats. Dr. Dobb’s Journal, dec 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gunter P. Sharp, Philip H. Enslow, Shamkant B. Navathe, and Fariborz Farhmand. Managing vulnerabilities of information system to security incindets. ACM International Conference: 5th international conference on Electronic commerce, pages 348–354, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. O. Sheyner, J. Haines, S.Jha, R. Lippmann, and J.M. Wing. Automated generation and analysis of attack graphs. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P‘02).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas Siu. Risk-eye for IT security guy. Gsec, pages 1–20, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Balzarotti, D., Monga, M., Sicari, S. (2006). Assessing the risk of using vulnerable components. In: Gollmann, D., Massacci, F., Yautsiukhin, A. (eds) Quality of Protection. Advances in Information Security, vol 23. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36584-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36584-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-29016-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-36584-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics