Skip to main content

Malingering: Summary and Conclusions

  • Chapter
Causality of Psychological Injury

Abstract

Malingering is often of concern within the context of personal injury litigation or other medicolegal situations in which compensation or disability benefits for traumatic brain injury (TBI), chronic pain, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and other psychoemotional problems may be at issue. Although there has been extensive study, there is still very poor understanding of what the incidence or prevalence of malingering may be in such situations. Estimates of incidence or prevalence vary widely, mitigating against the use of base rates in determining the utility or most appropriate cutting scores of any diagnostic sign or test result. Overall, there is generally only moderate and often inconsistent evidence that litigation or compensation status (i.e., those involved in litigation, applying for compensation or receiving compensation) by itself is associated with increased symptomatology or disability and there are many possible explanations for such a relationship independent of malingering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Martelli, M. F. (2005). Ethical challenges in the neuropsychology of pain, Part 1. In S. S. Bush (Ed.), A casebook of ethical challenges in neuropsychology (pp. 113–123). New York: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martelli, M. F., & Zasler, N. D. (2002). Ethics and objectivity in medicolegal contexts: Recommendations for experts. In R. B. Weiner (Ed.), Pain management: A practical guide for clinicians (6th ed., pp. 895–908). Boca Ratan, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, K. (2005). Ethical challenges in the neuropsychology of pain, Part 2. In S. S. Bush, (Ed.), A casebook of ethical challenges in neuropsychology (pp. 124–129). New York: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Martin, M. A., & Vitacco, M. (2003). Detection of feigned mental disorders: A meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 and malingering. Assessment, 10, 160–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nicholson, K., Martelli, M.F. (2007). Malingering: Summary and Conclusions. In: Causality of Psychological Injury. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36445-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics