Abstract
This paper is about using technology to help people who share knowledge orally. The objective is to appreciate the social and technical needs of this preference so as to narrow the divide developing between these people and those who earn their living from written knowledge sharing. Writing is not the preferred method of knowledge sharing for the majority of peoples on earth nor is it appropriate for the majority of problems. A mix of both literacy and orality is believed to be the ideal, so a failure to develop cheap and relevant synchronous and asynchronous oral knowledge sharing technology may down play the importance of orality in the social and economic development of both the developed and developing nations. This paper will argue that IS designers interested in global diversity, equity, innovation and economic development through communication technology need to place more emphasis on orality. The difference between oral and written knowledge sharing will be discussed to explain the need for both synchronous and asynchronous communication technologies. A small study comparing asynchronous oral and written communication is presented as is an attempt to design an Internet based oral conferencing system to link Aboriginal communities. It was found that there was a need for developing cheap community based conferencing facilities and to improve the asynchronous oral communication technologies.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashrawi, H. “Democracy, Survival and Co-operation”, keynote speech presented to the inaugural Adelaide Festival of Ideas, Adelaide, July 1999.
Butler, T. “Making Sense of Knowledge”, ECIS Proceedings, Vienna, July 2000. Checkland, P., and Holwell, S. Information, Systems and IS, New York: Wiley, 1998.
Chandler, D., 2002. Available at: http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/litoral/litoral.html Dewey, J. How We Think, Lexington, Mass.: DC Heath, 1910.
Fowler, R. M. “What Hypertext Can Teach Us”, Interpersonal Computing and Technology, (2:3), 1994, pp. 12–46.
Habermas, J. and McCarthy, T. Communication and the Evolution of Society, London: Heinemann, 1979.
Ife, J., Community Development: Creating Community Alternatives, Melbourne: Longman, 1999.
Issacs, W. N. “Taking Flight: Dialogue, Collective Thinking and Organizational Learning”, Organizational Dynamics, (22: 2 ), 1993.
Jones, S. G. Cybersociety, California: Sage, 1995.
Kock, N. “Asynchronous and Distributed Process Improvement”, Information Systems Journal, (11), 2001, pp. 87–110.
Lawson, C. “Towards a Competency Theory of a Region”, Cambridge Journal of Economics,(23), 1999, pp.151–166.
Olson, D. R. and Torrance N. (Eds). Literacy and Orality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Ong, W. J. Orality and Literacy: The.Technologizing of the Word, New York: Methuen, 1982.
Savard, J. “A Theoretical Debate on Social and Political Implications of Internet Implementation”, Wicazo SA Review, (13:2), Fall 1998, pp. 83–97.
Shirani, A. et al. “Comparison of Two Technologies for Synchronous and Asynchronous
Group Communication“, Information & Management,(36), 1999, pp. 139–150.
Walsham, G. “GIS for District Level Administration in India”, MIS Quarterly,(23:1), 1999
pp. 39–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Metcalfe, M., Joham, C. (2003). The ‘Ear’ and ‘Eye’ Digital Divide. In: Korpela, M., Montealegre, R., Poulymenakou, A. (eds) Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 126. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35695-2_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35695-2_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6109-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35695-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive