Abstract
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon have rekindled public debate about National Identification Schemes (NIDS) in the US, Canada, and other countries. While much of the debate has focused on the tradeoffs between security protection and the potential loss of privacy and other civil liberties, this paper examines the prior question of whether a NIDS would actually be effective in preventing terrorist attacks of the kind the world recently witnessed. It examines currently proposed NIDS and finds none that identify how it would contribute to reducing the threat of major terrorist attack. By relying on unfocused measures of questionable effectiveness, NIDS may actually create a false sense of security that leaves us more vulnerable than before. We therefore risk impairing our vital liberties with little gained in return. In this light, the oft-cited trade-off between liberty and security may be irrelevant, or worse, a distraction that prematurely concedes and obscures a dangerous presumption.
This paper is based on the Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) National Identification Schemes (NIDS) and the Fight against Terrorism: FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) (Clement, et al., 2001). The authors are grateful for the contributions of Ian Bicking, L. Jean Camp, Paul Czyzewski, Susan Evoy, Harry Hochheiser, Peter Hope-Tindall, Chris Hibbert, Alessandro Lofaro, Lenny Siegel and other participants in the [CPSRnatlDfag] discussion list. For more information, please see CPSR’s website at http://www.cpsr.org
The updated original online version for this book can be found at DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35609-9_29
Chapter PDF
References
Clarke, Roger (2001) Biometrics and Privacy, Notes of 15 April, 2001, http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/DV/Biometrics.html
Clement, A., Stalder, F., Johnson, J. and Guerra, R. (2001) National Identification Schemes (NIDS) and the Fight against Terrorism: FAQ Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR), November 2001. http://www.cpsr.org/program/natlID/natllDfaq.html
Coffee, Peter (2001) National ID cards are not the answer. eWeek,October, 24, 2001 http://www.zdnet.com/filters/printertricndly/0,6061,2819922–2,00. html
Council on Foreign Relations (2002) Terrorism: Q & A website http://www.terrorismanswers.com/security/borders print.html
Ellison, Larry (2001) Smart Cards: Digital IDs can help prevent terrorism. Wall Street Journal, October 8, 2001
Etzioni, Amitai (2002) You’ll love those national ID cards, Christian Science Monitor, January 14, 2002 http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0114/p1 I sl-coop.html
Hoescht, Tim, (Senior VP, Technology, Oracle Service Industries.) Testimony to the House Committee on Government Reform Subcommittee on Government Efficiency, Financial Management, and Intergovernmental Relations, November 16, 2001 http://www.house.gov/reform/gefmir/hearingsl2001hearingsl1116 nationa. id/1116 witnesses.htm
IEEE-USA (2001) Position Statement - Against Use Of Universal Identifiers (UIDs) February 15, 2001 http://www.ieee.org/organizations/pubs/newsletters/npss/0601/against_UID.htm
LeBlanc, Daniel (2001). 80 per cent would back national ID cards, The Globe and Mail, October 6, p. 1.
National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Authentication and Technologies and Their Privacy Implications (2002) IDs — Not That Easy: Questions About National Identification Systems,National Academy Press, http://books.nap.edu/html/id_questions
Neumann, P. and Weinstein, L. (2001) `Risks of National Identity Cards’ Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery,44 147. www.csl.sri.com/users/neumann/insiderisks.hunl
Shneiderman, Ben, “National Identification Card Systems,” Testimony to the House Committee on Government Reform Subcommittee on Government Efficiency, Financial Management, and Intergovernmental Relations, November 16, 2001 http://www.house.gov/reform/gefmir/hearings/2001hearings/1 1 16_nationa. jd/1 1 16_wi tnesses.htm
Shattuck, John (1996). Computer Matching Is a Serious Threat to Individuals Rights. In Kling, Rob (ed.) Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices 2nd. Edition. pp. 645–651 San Diego: Academic Press
Stalder, Felix; Lyon, David (in press). Electronic Identity Cards and Social Classification. In Lyon, David (ed.) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Automated Discrimination. London, New York: Routledge
Travis, Adam (2002). Compulsory ID cards back on the agenda, The Guardian, February 6, 2002, p. 5
Turley, Jonathan (2002). National ID: Beware what you wish for, Commentary, LA Times, http://www.latimes.cominews/printedition/opinion/la-000001978jan09.story.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clement, A., Guerra, R., Johnson, J., Stalder, F. (2002). National Identification Schemes (NIDS). In: Brunnstein, K., Berleur, J. (eds) Human Choice and Computers. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 98. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35609-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35609-9_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5429-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35609-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive