Abstract
Designers are now expected to ‘generate’ life-oriented design solutions. This transition to ‘Design Synthesis for Multi-X (DFΣX)’ reflects an increase in demands being put on designers. This paper reports on the development and implementation of a Knowledge Intensive CAD (KICAD) tool aimed at proactively supporting designers in foreseeing and exploring multiple life-cycle consequences co-evolving during mechanical artefact design decision making. A phenomena model describing ‘how’ consequences are generated highlights the necessity of designers engaging in concurrent synthesis. This understanding is exploited by a ‘Knowledge of Consequences’ approach to DFΣX on which the KICAD implementation is based. The paper includes an outline of the KICAD’s knowledge model, system requirements and architecture. The application of a prototype named FORESEE to pro-actively supporting ‘life-oriented’ exploration is demonstrated via a thermoplastic component design scenario. An evaluation of the prototype revealed strengths and limitations that highlight future research challenges for developing KICAD tools aimed at supporting DFΣX.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreasen, M. M., A. H. B. Duffy, K. J. MacCallum, J. Bowen and T. Storm (1996). “The Design Co-ordination Framework: key elements for effective product development”. The Design Productivity Debate. A. H. B. Duffy. London, Springer-Verlag: pp. 151–172.
Blessing, L. M. (1994). “A Process-Based Approach To Computer Supported Engineering Design”. Ph.D., Enschede, University of Twente.
Borg, J. and K. J. MacCallum (1996). “Structuring Knowledge of Life-Cycle Consequences for Supporting Concurrent Design Exploration”; IFIP TC5 WG5.2, International Conference on Knowledge Intensive CAD,Vol. 2, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Chapman Hall, pp. 208–223.
Borg, J. and X. T. Yan (1998). “Design Decision Consequences: Key to ‘Design For Multi-X ‘Support”; Proceedings, 2nd International Symposium ‘Tools and Methods For Concurrent Engineering’, Manchester, UK, pp. 169–184.
Brown, D. (1996). “Which way to KIC?”; IFIP TC5 WG5.2, International Conference on Knowledge Intensive CAD,Vol. 2, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Chapman Hall, pp. 291–295.
Duffy, A. H. B. and M. M. Andreasen (1995). “Enhancing the Evolution of Design Science”; International Conference on Engineering Design, Praha, pp. 29–35.
Duffy, A. H. B., M. M. Andreasen, K. J. MacCallum and L. N. Reijers (1993). “Design Coordination for Concurrent Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Design 4(4): pp. 251265.
Giarratano, J. C. and G. D. Riley (1994). Expert Systems: Principles and Programming. USA, PWS.
Guan, X. and K. J. MacCallum (1995). “Handling of positional information in a system for supporting early geometric design”; AI System Support for Conceptual Design, Ambleside, UK, Springer-Verlag, pp. 55–70.
Holtzman, S. (1988). Intelligent decision systems. Reading Mass. Addison-Wesley.
Hubka, V. and E. Eder (1988). Theory of technical systems: A total concept theory for engineering design. Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.
Ishii, K. (1995). “Life-Cycle Engineering Design.” Transactions of the ASME 117: pp. 42–47.
Kerr, S. M. (1993). “The Importance of Manipulating Past Design Knowledge by Group Rationalisation”. Internal Report, Glasgow, CAD Centre, DMEM, University of Strathclyde.
Medland, T. (1997). “A decision directed design approach.” Engineering Designer (May): pp. 4–7.
Olesen, J. (1992). “Concurrent Development in Manufacturing - based on dispositional mechanisms”. Ph.D., Institute for Engineering Design Lyngby, The Technical University of Denmark.
Roozenburg, N. F. M. and J. Eekels (1995). Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods. Wilshire, John Wiley Sons Ltd.
Shah, J. J. and M. Mantyla (1995). Parametric and Feature-based CAD/CAM. New York, John Wiley Sons, Inc.
Tjalve, E. (1979). A Short Course in Industrial Design. London, Newnes-Butterworths.
Walters, J. R. and N. R. Nielsen (1988). Crafting Knowledge Based Systems - Expert Systems Made Realistic. New York, John Wiley Sons.
Yan, X. T. and J. E. E. Sharpe (1995). “Reasoning and Truth Maintenance of Causal Structures in Interdisciplinary Product Modelling and Simulation.”. International Workshop on Engineering Design: AI System Support for Conceptual Design. England, Springer: pp. 403–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borg, J.C., Yan, XT., Juster, N.P. (2000). A KICAD Tool for Pro-Active Exploration Support to ‘Design Synthesis for Multi-X’. In: Finger, S., Tomiyama, T., Mäntylä, M. (eds) Knowledge Intensive Computer Aided Design. KIC 1998. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 33. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35582-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35582-5_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5636-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35582-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive