The Screen and the World: A Phenomenological Investigation into Screens and Our Engagement in the World

  • Lucas D. Introna
  • Fernando M. Ilharco
Chapter
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 41)

Abstract

In this paper, we attempt to show how phenomenology can provide an interesting and novel basis for thinking about screens in a world where screens now pervade all aspects of our daily existence. We first provide a discussion of the key phenomenological concepts. This is followed by its application to the phenomenon of a screen. In our phenomenology of the screen, we aim to give an essential account of a screen, as a screen, in its very screen-ness. We follow Heidegger’s argument that the screen will only show itself as a screen in its functioning as a screen in the world where screens are what they are. We claim, and aim to show, that our analysis provides many insights about the screen-ness of screens that we can not gain through any other method of investigation. We also show that although our method is not empirical its results have many important implications for the empirical world.

Keywords

Phenomenology theoretical investigation information technology information systems personal computer television screen. 

References

  1. ABCnews. Http://archive.abcnews.go.com/sections/world/1997/97_diana.html December 29, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, P. “In TV: On Nearness’, on Heidegger and on Television,” in RUA TV? Heidegger and the Televisual, T. Fry (ed.). Sydney: Power Publications, 1993Google Scholar
  3. Biemel, W. “Origin and Development of Husserl’s Phenomenology,” in Encyclopaedia Britannica (15 th ) ed.). Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1980, 1995 update.Google Scholar
  4. Boland, R. J. “Information System Use as a Hermeneutic Process,” in Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. A. Hirschheim (eds.). Amsterdam: NorthHolland, 1991, pp. 439–464.Google Scholar
  5. Boland, R. J. “The In-Formation of Information Systems,” in Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, R. J. Boland and R. Hirschheim (eds.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. Boland, R. J. (1985) “Phenomenology: A Preferred Approach to Research on Information Systems” in Research Methods in Information Systems, E. Mumford. R. Hirschheim, G.Google Scholar
  7. Fitzgerald, and T. Wood-Harper (eds.). Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985, pp. 193–201 Boland, R. J. “The Process and Product of System Design,” Management Science (28:9), 1978, pp. 887–898.Google Scholar
  8. Boland, R. J., and Day, W.F. “The Experience of System Design: A Hermeneutic of Organizational Action,” Scandinavian Journal of Management (5:2), 1989, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
  9. Borgmann, A. Holding On to Reality: The Nature of Information at the Turn of the Millenium. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. Ciborra, C. U. “De Profundis? Deconstructing the Concept of Strategic Alignment,” Department of Informatics University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. ComputerindustryAlmanac. Http://looksmart.infoplease.com/ipa/A0006115.html December 23, 1999.Google Scholar
  12. Crystal, D. The Cambrige Encyclopedia of Language, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  13. Detnews. Http://www.dtnews.com/1997/diana/9709/05/0098.htm December 29, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Dicionârio Universal da Lingua Portuguesa. Lisboa, Portugal: Texto Editora, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. Dicionârio da Lingua Portuguesa. Porto, Portugal: Porto Editora, 1989.Google Scholar
  16. Dreyfus, H. L. Being-in-the-world: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  17. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Http://www.britannica.com, December 23, 1999.Google Scholar
  18. Fry, T. “Switchings” in RUA TV? Heidegger and the Televisual, T. Fry (ed.). Sydney: Power Publications, 1993.Google Scholar
  19. Hammond, M., Howarth, J., and Keat, R. Understanding Phenomenology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. Heidegger, M. Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell, 1962.Google Scholar
  21. Heidegger, M. “On the Essence of Truth,” in Basic Writings. London: Routledge, 1978.Google Scholar
  22. Heidegger, M. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1977.Google Scholar
  23. Hegel, G. W. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Husserl, E. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Husserl, E. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1970a.Google Scholar
  26. Husserl, E. The Idea of Phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964a.Google Scholar
  27. Husserl, E. Logical Investigations. New York: Humanities Press, 1970b.Google Scholar
  28. Husserl, E. Phenomenology of Internal Time Consciousness, by M. Heidegger (ed.) and J. Churchill (trans). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1964b.Google Scholar
  29. Husserl, E. “Pure Phenomenology, Its Method and Its Field of Investigation,” 1917, reprinted in Husserl: Shorter Works, P. McCormick and F. Elliston (eds.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  30. Introna, L. “Information: A Hermeneutic Perspective,” in Proceedings First European Conference of Information Systems, Henley on Thames, England, UK. 1993, pp. 171–179Google Scholar
  31. Introna, L. Management, Information and Power, London: Macmillan, 1997.Google Scholar
  32. Macann, C. Four Phenomenological Philosophers: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Meleau-Ponty. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
  33. McCormack, P., and Elliston, F. (eds.). Husserl: Shorter Works. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  34. Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge, 1962.Google Scholar
  35. Michaelis Illustrated Dictionary, Volume I, English-Portuguese. Comp. Melhoramentos de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brasil, 1958.Google Scholar
  36. Minidicionârio Verbo-Oxford de Inglês-Português-Inglês. Oxford: Oxford University, and Lisboa, Portugal: Press and Editorial Verbo, 1996.Google Scholar
  37. Nietzsche, F. The Gay Science. New York: Vintage Books, 1974.Google Scholar
  38. Oxford Paperback Dictionary & Thesaurus,Julia Elliot (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  39. Polt, R. Heidegger: An Introduction. London: UCL Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  40. Schmitt, R. “Phenomenology” in The Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan, 1996.Google Scholar
  41. Spiegelberg, H. Doing Phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spiegelberg, H. “Characteristics of Phenomenology,” in Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15` h ed. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1980, 1995 update.Google Scholar
  43. Spiegelberg, H. The Phenomenological Movement —A Historical Introduction, 3’d ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
  44. Winograd, T., and Flores, F. Understanding Computers and Cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1987.Google Scholar
  45. Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967.Google Scholar
  46. Webster Dictionary. Http://www.m-w.com, December 17, 1999.Google Scholar
  47. Zuboff, S. In the Age of the Smart Machine. New York: Basic Books, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas D. Introna
    • 1
  • Fernando M. Ilharco
    • 1
  1. 1.London School of Economics and Political ScienceUK

Personalised recommendations