Abstract
This paper examines the usefulness of the diffusion of innovation research in developing theoretical accounts of the adoption of complex and networked IT solutions. We contrast six conjectures underlying DOI research with field data obtained from the study of the diffusion of EDI. Our analysis shows that DOI based analyses miss some important facets in the diffusion of complex technologies. We suggest that complex IT solutions should be understood as socially constructed and learning intensive artifacts, which can be adopted for varying reasons within volatile diffusion arenas. Therefore DOI researchers should carefully recognize the complex, networked, and learning intensive features of technology; understand the role of institutional regimes, focus on process features (including histories) and key players in the diffusion arena, develop multi-layered theories that factor out mappings between different layers and locales, use multiple perspectives including political models, institutional models and theories of team behavior, and apply varying time scales while crafting accounts of what happened and why. In general the paper calls for a need to develop DOI theories at the site by using multiple levels of analysis.
Key words
The original version of this chapter was revised: The copyright line was incorrect. This has been corrected. The Erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35404-0_19
Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
References
Arthur, W. B. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-in by historical events.” Economic Journal, Volume 99, 1989, pp. 116–131.
Attewell, P. “Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing.” Organization Science, Volume 3, Number 1, 1992, pp. 1–19.
Bensaou. “7-Eleven Japan: Creating the Virtual Corporation.” In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Information Systems, ed. J. Dias Coelho, Tawfik Jelassi, Wolfgang Koning, Helmut Krcmar, and Markku Saaksjarvi, 1275–1307. Lisbon, Portugal: Litografia Amorim, 1996.
Bjorn-Andersen, N., and Krcmar, H. “Looking Back–A cross-analysis of 14 EDI cases.” In EDI in Europe.- How It Works in Practice, ed. Helmut Krcmar, Niels Bjorn-Andersen, and Ramon O’Callaghan, 299–325. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1995.
Bouchard, L. “Decision Criteria in the Adoption of EDI.” In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Systems, 365–376. Orlando, Florida, 1993.
Ciborra, C. U., ed. Groupware & Teamwork, Wiley Series in Information Systems. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
Damanpour, F., and Evan, W. “Organizational Innovation and performance: the problem of ‘organizational lag’.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Volume 29, 1984, pp. 392–409.
Damsgaard, J. The Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange: An Institutional and Organizational Analysis of Alternative Diffusion Patterns. Aalborg: Ph.D. Thesis, R-962041, Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, 1996.
Damsgaard, J. “The Danish EDI Bandwagon Gaining Momentum.” In Proceedings of the 30th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Maui, Hawaii, ed. R. H. Sprague, IV, 31–41. Wailea: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1997.
Damsgaard, J., and Lyytinen, K. “Hong Kong’s EDI Bandwagon. Derailed or on the right track?” In Facilitating Technology Transfer Through Partnership: Learning from Practice and Research, ed. Tom McMaster, Enid Mumford, E. Burton Swanson, Brian Warboys, and David Wastell, 39–63. London: Chapman and Hall, 1997.
Damsgaard, J., and Lyytinen, K. “Contours of Electronic Data Interchange in Finland: Overcoming technological barriers and collaborating to make it happen.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Volume 7, 1998, pp. 275–297.
Damsgaard, J., and Truex, D. “The Procrustean Bed of Standards. Binary relations and the limits of EDI standards.” European Journal of Information Systems, Volume 9, Number 3, 2000, pp. 173–188.
Delhaye, R., and Lobet-Maris, C. “EDI Adoption and Standard Choice: A Conceptual Model.” In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Information Systems, ed. G. Doukidis, B. Galliers, T. Jelassi, and F. Land, 165–182. Athens, Greece: Print Xpress, 1995.
Downs, G. W., and Mohr, L. B. “Conceptual Issues in the study of innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Volume 21, 1976, pp. 700–714.
Grudin, J. “Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces.” Office, Technology and People, Volume 4, Number 3, 1988, pp. 245–264.
Hai, T. H. Organizational Predisposition toward and Information Technology Innovation: The Roles of Three Theoretical Perspectives in the Case of Financial Electronic Data Interchange. Singapore: Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, National University of Singapore„ 1998. Ph.D Thesis.
Hanseth, O. Information Technology as Infrastructure. Gothenburg: Ph.D. Thesis, Report 10, Department of Informatics, Gothenburg University, 1996.
Heikkilä, J. The Diffusion of a Learning Intensive Technology Into Organizations: The Case of Personal Computing: Ph.D. Thesis, A-104, Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, 1995.
Hughes, T. “The Evolution of Large Technological Systems.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, ed. W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 51–82. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1987.
Herlück, J. “The Pragmatics of EDI: The Use of EDI will unify Business procedures.” International Journal of Information Management,Volume 14, Number 5, 1994, pp. 330343.
Karsten, H. “”It’s like everyone working around the same desk“: Organisational Readings of Lotus Notes.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Volume 7, Number 1, 1995, pp. 3–32.
Kindleberger, C. P. “Standards as Public, Collective and Private Goods.” Kyklos–International Review for Social Sciences, Volume 36, Number 3, 1983, pp. 377–396.
King, J. L., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K. L., McFarlan, F. W., Raman, K. S., and Yap, C. S. “Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation.” Information Systems Research, Volume 5, Number 2, 1994, pp. 139–169.
King, J. L., and Kraemer, K. L. “Information Infrastructure, national policy and global competitiveness.” Information Infrastructure and Policy, Volume 1, Number 1, 1995, pp. 1–24.
Lyytinen, K. “Penetration of information technology in organizations. A comparative study using stage models and transaction costs.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Volume 3, 1991, pp. 87–109.
Mahajan, V., Muller, E., and Bass, F. M. “New Products Diffusion Models in Marketing: A review and Directions for Research.” Journal of Marketing, Volume 54, 1990, pp. 1–26.
Markus, M. L., and Robey, D. “Information Technology and Organizational change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research.” Management Science, Volume 34, Number 5, 1988, pp. 583–598.
McKendrick, A. A Report on Electronic Data Interchange by the EDI Working Party of the Hong Kong Retail Management Association. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Retail Management Association, 1993.
McKenny, J. Waves of change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1995.
Monteiro, E., and Hanseth, O. “Social Shaping of Information Infrastructure: On Being Specific about the Technology.” In Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 working Conference on Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work, ed. Wanda J. Orlikowski, Geoff Walsham, and Janice I. DeGross, 325–343: Chapman and Hall, 1995.
Nolan, R. L. “Managing the Computer Resource: A Stage Hypothesis.” Communications of the ACM, Volume 16, Number 7, 1973, pp. 399–405.
Nolan, R. L. “Managing the crisis in data processing.” Harvard Business Review, Volume March-April, 1979, pp. 115–126.
O’Callaghan, R., and Turner, J. A. “Electronic Data Interchange–Concepts and Issues.” In EDI in Europe: How It Works in Practice, ed. Helmut Krcmar, Niels Bjorn-Andersen, and Ramon O’Callaghan, 1–19. Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1995.
Orlikowski, W. J., and Gash, D. C. Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations : Working paper #3627–93. Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, MIT, 1993.
Pinch, T., and Bijker, W. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, ed. W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 1750. Cambrigde, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1987.
Popper, K. Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.
Porter, M. E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press, 1985.
Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., and Nilakanta, S. “Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective.” Journal of Management Information Systems, Volume 11, Number 2, 1994, pp. 157–186.
Prescott, M. B., and Conger, S. A. “Information Technology Innovations: A Classification by IT Locus of Impact and Research Approach.” Data Base Advances, Volume 26, Number 2 and 3, 1995, pp. 20–41.
Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. Fourth ed. New York: The Free Press, 1995.
Star, S. L., and Ruhleder, K. “Steps toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Accessfor Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research, Volume 7, Number 1, 1996, pp. 111–134.
Thirtle, C. G., and Ruttan, V. W. The Role of Demand and Supply in the Generation and Diffusion of Technical Change. Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH, 1987.
Tornatzky, L. G., and Klein, K. J. “Innovation Characteristics And Adoption-Implementation.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Volume EM-29, Number 1, 1982, pp. 28–45.
Webster, J. “Networks of Collaboration or Conflict? Electronic Data Interchange and Power in the Supply Chain.” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Volume 4, Number 1, 1995, pp. 31–42.
Wolfe, R. A. “Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions.” Journal of Management Studies, Volume 31, Number 3, 1994, pp. 405–431.
Wrigley, C. D., Wagenaar, R. W., and Clarke, R. A. “Electronic Data Interchange in International trade: frameworks for the strategic analysis of ocean port communities.” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Volume 3, Number 3, 1994, pp. 211–234.
Zmud, R. W. “An examination of ‘Push-Pull’ theory applied to process innovation in knowledge work.” Management Science, Volume 30, Number 6, 1984, pp. 727–738.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lyytinen, K., Damsgaard, J. (2001). What’s Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory?. In: Ardis, M.A., Marcolin, B.L. (eds) Diffusing Software Product and Process Innovations. TDIT 2001. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 59. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35404-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35404-0_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4975-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35404-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive