Abstract
The role of the interface in structuring student learning and in directing the learner’s cognitive effort toward relevant material has become increasingly centralised in recent years. Specifically, interface designers have been called on to design interfaces which keep the learner focused on or “engaged” in the domain material, with the view that such engagement will have learning benefits. In this paper we operationalise the notion of cognitive engagement in terms of familiar cognitive psychological principles: planning and learning. Following laboratory studies, we have taken the view that cognitive planning can be induced by increasing the “cost” of selecting and executing actions by designing less direct interfaces. A study is reported which contrasts direct and indirect manipulation interfaces for a constraint-based planning task. Results from the study suggest that manipulation style can indeed affect users’ information search and task solution strategies.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Churchill, E. F., and Ainsworth, S. (1995). “Making Claims about Teaching Systems.” in K Norby, P.H. Helmersen, D.J. Gilmore, S.A. Arnesen (Eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Interact ‘85. Chapman and Hall
Corbett, Anderson, J. R., and Fincham (1990). “Menu Selection versus Typing: Effects on Learning in an Intelligent Programming Tutor.” in C. Frasson and G. Gauthier (Eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems: At the Crossroads of Artificial Intelligence and Education.
Gilmore, D. (1996) The Relevance of HCI Guidelines for Educational Interfaces. Machine Mediated learning, 5 (2) 119–133.
Jackson, S., Stratford, S.J., Krajcik, J and Soloway, E. (1996) A Learner-centred Tool for Students Buidling Models. In Communications of the ACM,: Special issue on Learner Centred Design 39, 4, 24–27.
Laurillard, D. (1993) Rethinking University teaching: A Framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.
Littleton, K., Light, P., Joiner, R., Messer, D and Barnes, P. (1994) Gender and software interaction in children’s computer-based problem solving. Internal report: ESRC Centre for Research in Development, Instruction and Training, Department of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Malone, T. (1981). “Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction.” Cognitive Science 4: 333–369.
Moore, A. (1993) Siuli’s Maths Lesson: Autonomy or Control. In J. Benyon and H. Mackay (eds) Computers into Classroom. More Questions Than Answers. The Falmer Press, Sussex, UK.
Norman, D. and Spohrer, J. (1996) Introduction. Communications of the ACM: Special issue on Learner Centred Design, 39, 4, 24–27.
O’Hara, K. and Payne, S (1994). “Cost of operations affects planfulness of action.” Unpublished internal report, School of Psychology, Cardiff College, University of Wales, Wales, UK.
Svendsen, G. B. (1991). “The influence of interface style on problem solving.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 35: 379–397.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holst, S.J., Churchill, E.F., Gilmore, D.J. (1997). Balloons, Boats and Ponies: Interface manipulation style and learning in a constraint-based planning task. In: Howard, S., Hammond, J., Lindgaard, G. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT ’97. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35175-9_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35175-9_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5437-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35175-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive