Maximizing the Potential of Information Technology for Management: Strategies for interfacing the Technical Core of Education

  • C. L. Fulmer
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT)


The impact of information systems will be maximized when the capacity of the technological architecture and system design are capable of interfacing with the technical core of education. The technical core of education is defined as the interface between the student and the contexts in which they acquire or generate knowledge. The author provides a vision of an integrated information system with (a) multiple input ports, (b) alternative units of analysis for inquiry, (c) variable types of data, (d) choice of analytic processes, and (e) variable access ports for retrieval of data. The author argues that this vision becomes a reality when the system is designed through an inductive process that includes stakeholders from all levels of the organization. To achieve this vision of an integrated information system, educators and information systems specialists need to find ways to integrate the capacity of the information technology with the work and the work life of the technical core and its participants.


Information Systems User/Machine Systems Computing Milieu Computer Uses in Education Computer Application Administrative Data Processing 


  1. 1.
    Perelman, L. J. (1992). School’s out: Hyperlearning, the new technology, and the end of education. New York: William Morrow and Company.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haas, J. D. (1988). Educational futures: Six scenarios, In. J. L. Burdin, (Ed.) School leadership: A contemporary reader. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Visscher, A. J. (1993). The computer as an administrative tool: Problems and impact, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 21 (1), 28–35.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Somerset, A. and Ekholm, M. (1990). Different information requirements for different levels of decision-making, In. K. N. Noss and L. Mahlck (Eds.), Planning the quality of education: The collection and use of data for informed decision-making, Pergamon, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Windham, D., Levin, H., and Bathory, Z. (1990). Issues in the design and development of educational information systems, In K. N. Noss and L. Mahlck (Eds.), Planning the quality of education: The collection and use of data for informed decision-making, Pergamon, Oxford, England, 1990.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kearsley, G. and Lynch, W. (1992). Educational leadership in the age of technology: The new skills. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25 (1), 50–60.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carter, R. B., Nilankanta, S. and Norris, D. (1993). Strategic planning for information systems: The evidence from a successful implementation in an academic setting, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24 (2), 280–288.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. L. Fulmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Leadership and Educational Policy Studies, Faculty of Educational Administration and School Business ManagementNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Personalised recommendations