Skip to main content

Multidimensional and Longitudinal Poverty: an Integrated Fuzzy Approach

  • Chapter
Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement

Part of the book series: Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being ((EIAP,volume 3))

Concluding Remarks

When poverty is viewed as a matter of degree in contrast to the conventional poor/non-poor dichotomy, that is, as a fuzzy state, two additional aspects are introduced into the analysis.

  1. (i)

    The choice of membership functions i.e. quantitative specification of individuals’ or households’ degrees of poverty and deprivation.

  2. (ii)

    And the choice of rules for the manipulation of the resulting fuzzy sets, rules defining their complements, intersections, union and aggregation. Specifically, for longitudinal analysis of poverty using the fuzzy set approach, we need joint membership functions covering more than one time period, which have to be constructed on the basis of the series of cross-sectional membership functions over those time periods.

This Chapter has discussed approaches and procedures for constructing fuzzy measures of income poverty and of combining them with similarly constructed measures of non-monetary deprivation using the fuzzy set approach. In fact, the procedures for combining fuzzy measures in multiple dimensions at a given time are identical, in formal terms, to the procedures for combining fuzzy cross-sectional measures over multiple time periods. We have proposed a general rule for the construction of fuzzy set intersections, that is, for the construction of a longitudinal poverty measure from a sequence of cross-sectional measures under fuzzy conceptualization. This general rule is meant to be applicable to any sequence of “poor” and “non-poor” sets, and it satisfies all the marginal constraints. On the basis of the results obtained, various fuzzy poverty measures over time can be constructed as consistent generalizations of the corresponding conventional (dichotomous) measures.

Numerical results of these procedures applied to measures of multidimensional poverty and deprivation, and to combinations of such measures have been presented elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Betti G, Cheli B, Cambini R (2004) A statistical model for the dynamics between two fuzzy states: theory and an application to poverty analysis. Metron 62:391–411.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Betti G, Cheli B, Lemmi A, Verma V (2005a) On the construction of fuzzy measures for the analysis of poverty and social exclusion. Presented at the International Conference in Memory of two Eminent Social Scientists: C. Gini and M.O. Lorenz, Siena, Italy, May 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti G, Cheli B, Lemmi A, Verma V (2005b) On longitudinal analysis of poverty conceptualised as a fuzzy state. Presented at the First Meeting of the Society for the Study of Economic Inequality (ECINEQ), Palma de Mallorca, Spain, July 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti G, Verma V (1999) Measuring the degree of poverty in a dynamic and comparative context: a multi-dimensional approach using fuzzy set theory. Proceedings ICCS-VI, Vol. 11, pp. 289–301, Lahore, Pakistan

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti G, Verma V (2002) Non-monetary or Lifestyle Deprivation. In: Eurostat, European Social Statistics: Income, Poverty and Social Exclusion: 2nd Report, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp 76–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti G, Verma V (2004) A methodology for the study of multi-dimensional and longitudinal aspects of poverty and deprivation. Universitá di Siena, Dipartimento di Metodi Quantitativi, Working Paper 49

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerioli A, Zani S (1990) A Fuzzy Approach to the Measurement of Poverty. In: Dagum C, Zenga M (eds) Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty, Studies in Contemporary Economics, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 272–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheli B (1995) Totally Fuzzy and Relative Measures in Dynamics Context. Metron 53:183–205.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheli B, Betti G (1999) Fuzzy Analysis of Poverty Dynamics on an Italian Pseudo Panel, 1985–1994. Metron 57:83–103.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheli B, Lemmi A (1995) A “Totally” Fuzzy and Relative Approach to the Multi-dimensional Analysis of Poverty. Economic Notes 24:115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappero-Martinetti E (2000) A multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning approach. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali 108:207–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark D, Qizilbash M (2002) Core poverty and extreme vulnerability in South Africa. The Economics Research Centre, School of Economic and Social Studies, University of East Anglia, Discussion Paper 2002/3

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2002) European Social Statistics: Income, Poverty and Social Exclusion: 2nd Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars AJM (1986) The Perception of Poverty. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir G J, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lelli S (2001) Factor Analysis vs. Fuzzy Sets Theory: Assessing the Influence of Different Techniques on Sen’s Functioning Approach. Discussion Paper Series DPS 01.21, November 2001, Center for Economic Studies, Catholic University of Louvain

    Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi E, Nickelsburg G (1988) Multivariate measures of well-being and ananalysis of inequality in the Michigan data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 6:326–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan B, Whelan CT (1996) Resources, deprivation and poverty. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram R (1982) Composite indices of physical quality of life, basic needs fulfillment and income. A principal component representation. Journal of Development Economics 11:227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma V, Betti G (2002) Longitudinal measures of income poverty and life-style deprivation. Universith degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento di Scienze di Statistiche, Working Paper 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan CT, Layte R, Maitre B, Nolan B (2001) Income, deprivation and economic strain: an analysis of the European Community Household Panel. European Sociological Review 17:357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8:338–353.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Achille Lemmi Gianni Betti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Betti, G., Cheli, B., Lemmi, A., Verma, V. (2006). Multidimensional and Longitudinal Poverty: an Integrated Fuzzy Approach. In: Lemmi, A., Betti, G. (eds) Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being, vol 3. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34251-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics