Skip to main content

The mind and the explanation of behavior

  • Chapter
The Evolving Brain
  • 953 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology, New York: Dover Publications (first published 1890).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature, Oxford: Clarendon Press (first published 1739-40).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freud, S. (1933). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes, J. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle, volumes 1 and 2. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A discussion of Aristotle’s influence on Christian thought can be found in: Russell, B. (1961). History of western philosophy. London: Allen and Unwin. Also see: Magoun, H.W. (1958). Early development of ideas relating the mind with the brain. In: Wolstenholme, G.E.W., and O’Connor, C.M. (eds.) Neurolgical basis of behavior, Ciba Foundation Symposium, London: Churchill, pp. 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huxley, T.H. (1970). Collected essays (1893–1894) volume 1, Method and results. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. Smith, H.W. (1959). The biology of consciousness. In: C.M. Brooks and P.F. Cranefield (eds). The historical development of physiological thought. New York: Hafner, pp. 110–136.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haldane, E.S. and Ross, G.R.T. (1955). The philosophical works of Descartes: Volume 1. New York: Dover publications (First published by Cambridge University Press, 1911). Reprinted with corrections in 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Demos, R. (1939). The philosophy of Plato, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, p. 92. Grube, G.M.A. (1935). Plato’s thought, London: Methuen and Co., pp. 120–149.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boring, E.G. (1953). A history of introspection. Psychological Bulletin, 50: 169–189. Hebb, D.O. (1980). Essay on mind. Hillsdale, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hebb, D.O. (1977). To know your own mind. In: J.M. Nicholas (ed.) Images perception and knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel; pp. 213–219. Humphrey, G. (1951). Thinking: an introduction to its experimental psychology. New York: Wiley. Lyons, W. (1986). The disappearance of introspection. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Nisbett, R.E., and Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84: 231–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vanderwolf, C.H. (1998). Brain, behavior, and mind: What do we know and what can we know? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 22: 125–142.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: an experimental view, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lamb, R.J., Preston, K.L., Schindler, C.W., Meisch, R.A., Davis, F., Katz, J.L., Henningfield, J.E., and Goldberg, S.R. (1991). The reinforcing and subjective effects of morphine in post-addicts: a dose-response study. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 259: 1165–1173. In order to receive an injection, the post-addicts had been trained on a fixed ratio-100 response schedule. This means that 100 lever presses were followed by turning on a red light for 1.0 seconds. When 30 such fixed-ratio responses (a total of 3,000 lever presses) had been completed, the light came on for 15 minutes and morphine or placebo was administered intramuscularly. Each drug condition was in force for one week and neither the experimenters nor the post-addicts knew what was in the syringe (double blind design). The number of correct responses on the questionnaire were: 38% for the 3.75 mg dose; 59% for the 7.5 mg dose, 44% for the 15 mg dose; and 98% for the 30 mg dose (by chance alone one would expect correct responses about 50% of the time).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: how psychology found its language. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lykken, D.T. (1991). What’s wrong with psychology anyway? In: J.D. Cichetti, W.M. Grove (eds.) Thinking clearly about psychology: matters of public interest, vol. I, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–39.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gaffan, D. (2001). What is a memory system? Horel’s critique revisited. Behavioural Brain Research, 127: 5–11. Horel, J.A. (1978). The neuroanatomy of amnesia: a critique of the hippocampal memory hypothesis. Brain, 101: 403–445. Horel, J.A. (1994). Some comments on the special cognitive functions claimed for the hippocampus. Cortex, 30: 269–280. Vanderwolf, C.H. and Cain, D.P. (1994). The behavioral neurobiology of learning and memory: a conceptual reorientation. Brain Research Reviews, 19: 264–297.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. A sampling of references to studies of the neural basis of attention: a) Peripheral filtering of non-attended stimuli: Hernández-Peón, R., Scherrer, H., and Jouvet, M. (1956). Modification of electrical activity in cochlear nucleus during “attention” in unanesthetized cats. Science, 123: 331–332. b) Thalamic intralaminar nuclei and brain stem reticular formation: Jasper, H.H. (1960). Unspecific thalamocortical relations. In: J. Field, H.W. Magoun and V.E. Hall (eds.) Handbook of physiology, Section 1: Neurophysiology, volume 2. Washington, D.C. American Physiological Society, pp. 1307–1321. Lindsley, D.B. (1960). Attention, consciousness, sleep and wakefulness. In: J. Field, H.W. Magoun, and V.E. Hall (eds) Handbook of physiology, Section 1: Neurophysiology, volume 3. Washington, D.C. American Physiological Society, pp. 1553–1593. c) The hippocampus: Bennett, T.L. (1975). The electrical activity of the hippocampus and processes of attention. In: R.L. Isaacson and K.H. Pribram (eds). The hippocampus, volume 2: Neurophysiology and behavior. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 71–99. d) The cingulate cortex: Kaada, B.R. (1960). Cingulate, posterior orbital, anterior insular and temporal pole cortex. In: J. Field, H.W. Magoun, and V.E. Hall (eds). Handbook of physiology, Section 1: Neurophysiology, volume 2. Washington, D.C. American Physiological Society, pp. 1345–1372. e) Parietal and frontal cortex: Colby, C.L., and Goldberg, M.E. (1999). Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22: 319–349. Kastner, S., and Ungerleider, L.G. (2000). Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23: 315–341. Kolb, B. and Whishaw, I.Q. (2001). An introduction to brain and behavior. New York: Worth Publishers, (see pp. 537–539). f) Cholinergic projections from the basal forebrain: McGaughy, J., Everitt, B.J., Robbins, T.W., and Sarter, M. (2000). The role of cortical cholinergic afferent projections in cognition: impact of new selective immunotoxins. Behavioural Brain Research, 115: 251–263. g) Ascending noradrenergic projections: Aston-Jones, G., and Bloom, F.E. (1981). Activity of norepinephrine-containing locus coeruleus neurons in behaving rats anticipates fluctuation in the sleep-waking cycle. Journal of Neuroscience, 1: 876–886. h) Hippocampal long-term potentiation: Shors, T.J., and Matzel, L.D. (1997). Long-term potentiation: What’s learning got to do with it? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20: 597–655. Amygdala: Gloor, P. (1960). Amygdala. In J. Field, H.W. Magoun, and V.E. Hall (eds). Handbook of physiology, Section 1: Neurophysiology, volume 2. Washington, D.C. American Physiological Society, pp. 1395–1420. j) Pyriform cortex: Freeman, W.J., and Skarda, C.A.(1985). Spatial EEG patterns, nonlinear dynamics and perception: the neo-Sherringtonian view. Brain Research Reviews, 10: 147–175. k) Superior colliculus: Goldberg, M.E. and Wurtz, R.H. (1972). Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. II. Effects of attention on neuronal responses. Journal of Neurophysiology, 35: 560–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenfield, L.C. (1968). From beast-machine to man-machine, New York: Octagon Books, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pfluger, E. (1853). Die sensorichen Functionen des Ruckenmarks der Wirbelthiere, Berlin: August Hirschwald. According to this concept, a spinal flexion reflex elicited by a pinprick is associated with a spinal awareness of pain.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Griffin, D.R. (1984). Animal thinking, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Margulis, L. and Sagan, D. (1995). What is life? New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Romijn, H. (2002). Are virtual photons the elementary carriers of consciousness? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9: 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sebel, P.S., Bonke, B., Winogrod, E. (eds.) Memory and awareness in anesthesia, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ostrum, A.E. (1994). The “locked-in” syndrome — comments from a survivor. Brain Injury, 8: 95–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sperry, R.W. (1974). Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. In: F.O. Schmitt and F.G. Worden (eds). The neurosciences: Third study program. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, pp. 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Popper, K.R., and Eccles, J.C. (1977). The self and its brain, Berlin: Springer-Verlag (see pp. 311–333).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weiskrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight: a case study and implications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goodale, M. and Milner, D. (2004). Sight unseen. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kimura, D. (1993). Neuromotor mechanisms in human communication. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). The mind and the explanation of behavior. In: The Evolving Brain. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34230-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics