Structure and Function of Woodland Mosaics: Consequences of Patch-Scale Heterogeneity and Connectivity Along the Grassland–Forest Continuum

  • David D. Breshears
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 196)

A large fraction of the terrestrial biosphere can be viewed as gradients of varying amounts of cover by woody plants, referred to as the grassland–forest continuum, (Figure 1; Belsky and Canham 1994; Breshears and Barnes 1999; Breshears 2006). Over such gradients, the proportion of cover from woody vegetation generally increases from grasslands to savannas to woodlands to forests. The ecosystems along the grassland–forest continuum vary with respect to their proportions of woody and herbaceous plants. Understanding and predicting the dynamics of mixed woody-herbaceous systems remain a major challenge (House et al. 2003). The juniper woodlands that are the focus of this volume represent one such system that is widely distributed in North America as well as elsewhere (McPherson 1997; Anderson et al. 1999).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, C.D. 1989. Changes in the landscape of the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, C.D., and Breshears, D.D. 1998. Drought induced shift of a forest-woodland ecotone: rapid landscape response to climate variation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95:14839–14842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R.C., Fralish, J.S., and Baskin, J.M., eds. 1999. Savannas, barrens, and rock outcrop plant communities of North America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, F.J. 1986. Carbon gain and water relations in pinyon-juniper habitat types. Ph.D. dissertation. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, F.J., and Cunningham, G.L. 1987. Water relations and productivity in pinyon-juniper habitat types. In: Proceedings, pinyon-juniper conference, ed. R.L. Everett, pp 406–411. General technical report INT-215. Ogden, UT: United States Forest Service.Google Scholar
  6. Belsky, A.J., and Canham, C.D. 1994. Forest gaps and isolated savanna trees. BioScience 44:77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Betancourt, J.L., Pierson, E.A., Rylander, K.A., Fairchild-Parks, J.A., and Dean, J.S. 1993. Influence of history and climate on New Mexico pinyon-juniper woodlands, In: Proceedings, managing pinyon-juniper ecosystems for sustainability and social needs, pp 42–62. General technical report RM-236. Fort Collins, CO: United States Forest Service.Google Scholar
  8. Bowen, B.M. 1990. Los Alamos climatology. LA-11735-MS; UC-902. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.Google Scholar
  9. Bowen, B.M. 1996. Rainfall and climate variation over a sloping New Mexico plateau during the North American monsoon. J. Clim. 9:3432–3442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breshears, D.D. 1993. Spatial partitioning of water use by herbaceous and woody lifeforms in semiarid woodlands. Ph.D. dissertation. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  11. Breshears, D.D. 2006. The grassland-forest continuum: trends in ecosystem properties for woody plant mosaics? Front. Ecol. Environ. 4:96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breshears, D.D., and Barnes, F.J. 1999. Interrelationships between plant functional types and soil moisture heterogeneity for semiarid landscapes within the grassland/forest continuum: a unified conceptual model. Landsc. Ecol. 14:465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Breshears, D.D., Cobb, N.S., Rich, P.M., Price, K.P., Allen, C.D., Balice, R.G., Romme, W.H., Kastens, J.H., Floyd, M.L., Belnap, J., Anderson, J.J., Myers, O.B., and Meyer, C.W. 2005. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102:15144–15148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Breshears, D.D., McDowell, N.G., Goddard, K.L., Dayem, K.E., Martens, S.N., Meyer, C.W. and Brown, K.M. 2008. Foliar absorption of intercepted rainfall improves plant water status and enables drought recovery. Ecology: in press.Google Scholar
  15. Breshears, D.D., Myers, O.B., Johnson, S.R., Meyer, C.W., and Martens, S.N. 1997a. Differential use of heterogeneous soil moisture by two semiarid woody species: Pinus edulis and Juniperus monosperma. J. Ecol. 85:289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Breshears, D.D., Rich, P.M., Barnes, F.J., and Campbell, K. 1997b. Overstory-imposed heterogeneity in solar radiation and soil moisture in a semiarid woodland. Ecol. Appl. 7:1201–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Breshears, D.D., Nyhan, J.W., Heil, C.E., and Wilcox, B.P. 1998. Effects of woody plants on microclimate in a semiarid woodland: soil temperature and evaporation in canopy and intercanopy patches. Int. J. Plant Sci. 159:1010–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coffin, D.P., and Lauenroth, W.K. 1990. A gap dynamics simulation model of succession in a semiarid grassland. Ecol. Model. 49:229–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collings, M.R. 1966. Throughfall for summer thunderstorms in a juniper and pinyon woodland, Cibecue Ridge, Arizona. Geological Survey professional paper 485-B. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  20. Davenport, D.W., Wilcox, B.P., and Breshears, D.D. 1996. Soil morphology of canopy and intercanopy sites in a piñon-juniper woodland. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:1881–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davenport, D.W., Breshears, D.D., Wilcox, B.P., and Allen, C.D. 1998. Viewpoint: Sustainability of piñon-juniper ecosystems—a unifying perspective of soil erosion thresholds. J. Range Manag. 51:229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fair, J.M., and Breshears, D.D. 2005. Drought stress and fluctuating asymmetry in Quercus undulata leaves: confounding effects of absolute and relative amounts of stress? J. Arid Environ. 62:235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hibbard, K.A., Schimel, D.S., Archer, S., Ojima, D.S., and Parton, W. 2003. Grassland to woodland transitions: integrating changes in landscape structure and biogeochemistry. Ecol. Appl. 13:911–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. House, J.I., Archer, S., Breshears, D.D., Scholes, R.J., and NCEAS Tree-Grass Interactions Participants. 2003. Conundrums in mixed woody-herbaceous systems. J. Biogeogr. 30:1763–1777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huxman, T.E., Wilcox, B.P., Breshears, D.D., Scott, R.L., Snyder, K.A., Small, E.E., Hultine, K., Pockman, W.T., and Jackson, R.B. 2005. Ecohydrological implications of woody plant encroachment. Ecology 86:308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lajtha, K., and Barnes, F.J. 1991. Carbon gain and water use in pinyon pine-juniper woodlands of northern New Mexico: field versus phytotron chamber measurements. Tree Physiol. 9:59–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lajtha, K., and Getz, J. 1993. Photosynthesis and water-use efficiency in pinyon-juniper communities along an elevation gradient in northern New Mexico. Oecologia (Berl) 94:95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loik, M.E., Breshears, D.D., Lauenroth, W.K., and Belnap, J. 2004. A multi-scale perspective of water pulses in dryland ecosystems: climatology and ecohydrology in western USA. Oecologia (Berl) 141:269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ludwig, J.A., Wilcox, B.P., Breshears, D.D., Tongway, D.J., and Imeson, A.C. 2005. Vegetation patches and runoff-erosion as interacting eco-hydrological processes in semiarid landscapes. Ecology 86:288–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martens, S.N., Breshears, D.D., Meyer, C.W., and Barnes, F.J. 1997. Scales of above- and below-ground competition differ in a semiarid woodland as detected from spatial pattern. J. Veg. Sci. 8:655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martens, S.N., Breshears, D.D., and Meyer, C.W. 2000. Spatial distributions of understory light along the grassland/forest continuum: effects of cover, height, and spatial pattern of tree canopies. Ecol. Model. 126:79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martens, S.N., Breshears, D.D., and Barnes, F.J. 2001. Development of species dominance along an elevational gradient: population dynamics of Pinus edulis and Juniperus monosperma. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162:777–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McPherson, G.R. 1997. Ecology and management of North American Savannas. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  34. Muñoz-Erickson, T.A., Loeser, M.R., and Aguilar-González, B.J. 2004. Identifying indicators of ecosystem health for semiarid ecosystems: a conceptual approach. In: The Colorado Plateau: cultural, biological, and physical research, eds. C. van Riper, III and K.L. Cole, pp 139–152. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  35. Nyhan, J.W., Hacker, L.W., Calhoun, T.E., and Young, D.L. 1978. Soil survey of Los Alamos County, New Mexico. LA-6779-MS; UC-11. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.Google Scholar
  36. Padien, D.J., and Lajtha, K. 1992. Plant spatial pattern and nutrient distribution in pinyon-juniper woodlands along an elevational gradient in northern New Mexico. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153:425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reich, P.B., Peterson, D.A., Wrage, K., and Wedin, D. 2001. Fire and vegetation effects on productivity and nutrient cycling across a forest-grassland continuum. Ecology 82:1703–1719.Google Scholar
  38. Reid, K.D., Wilcox, B.P., Breshears, D.D., and MacDonald, L. 1999. Runoff and erosion in a piñon-juniper woodland: influence of vegetation patches. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63:1869–1879.Google Scholar
  39. Reiley, D.K. 2003. Land use history and effects of soil carbon storage patterns in a pinyon-juniper woodland in northern New Mexico. M.S. thesis. University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison.Google Scholar
  40. Rich, P.M., Breshears, D.D. and White, A.B. 2008. Phenology of mixed woody-herbaceous ecosystems following extreme events: net changes from differential responses. Ecology: in press.Google Scholar
  41. Schlesinger, W.H., Reynolds, J.F., Cunningham, G.L., Huenneke, L.F., Jarrell, W.M., Virginia, R.A., and Whitford, W.G. 1990. Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247:1043–1048.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Skau, C.M. 1964. Interception, throughfall, and stemflow in Utah and alligator juniper cover types in northern Arizona. For. Sci. 10:283–287.Google Scholar
  43. Stimson, H.C., Breshears, D.D., Ustin, S.L., and Kefauver, S.C. 2005. Spectral sensing of foliar water conditions in two co-occurring conifer species: Pinus edulis and Juniperus monosperma. Remote Sens. Environ. 96:108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walter, H. 1971. Ecology of tropical and subtropical vegetation. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  45. Wilcox, B.P. 1994. Runoff and erosion in intercanopy zones of pinyon-juniper woodlands. J. Range Manag. 47:285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilcox, B.P., Breshears, D.D., and Allen, C.D. 2003a. Resource conservation in a semiarid woodland: effects of scale and disturbance. Ecol. Monogr. 73:223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilcox, B.P., Breshears, D.D., and Seyfried, M.S. 2003b. Water balance on rangelands. In: Encyclopedia of water science, pp 791–794. New York: Dekker.Google Scholar
  48. Wilcox, B.P., Breshears, D.D., and Turrin, H.J. 2003c. Hydraulic conductivity in a piñon-juniper woodland: influence of vegetation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:1243–1249.Google Scholar
  49. Williams, D.G., and Ehleringer, J.H. 2000. Intra- and interspecific variation for summer precipitation. Ecol. Monogr. 70:517–537.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • David D. Breshears
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Natural Resources and Institute for the Study of Planet EarthThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations