Abstract
In recent years, many US health care establishments have found themselves under increasing pressure to improve the cost-effectiveness of their operations in the face of tight competition, while maintaining high standards of care. Finding the best trade-off between these competing objectives is not an easy task, since the efforts to keep costs under control often result in over utilization of existing resources and, as a consequence, increased patient delays. The Institute of Medicine report Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21 st Century identifies “timeliness” as one of six goals that should drive the redesign of the health care delivery system in the coming years. For many patients, primary care is one of the most important settings for their contact with the health care system. In this setting, an appointment mechanism directly determines “timeliness” of received care. In this chapter we introduce a simple model that describes the evolution of appointment backlogs in a primary office setting and describe how expected value and the variance of the daily demand for appointments influences backlog buildup. We also discuss the popular practice of advanced access, a newly proposed approach for reducing and eliminating appointment delays. In particular, we develop a set of guidelines that any primary care office should use in determining the patient panel size to support the advanced access approach. Our guidelines are illustrated through a set of examples based on the demand and supply data taken from the surveys of the American Academy of Family Practice as well as 2002 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
5. References
Batal, H., Tench, J., McMillan, S., Adams, J., and Mehler, P.S., 2001. Predicting patient visits to an urgent care clinic using calendar variables, Academic Emergency Medicine 8(1): 48–53
Beck, J., Scott, J., Williams, P., Robertson, B., Jackson, D., Gade, G., and Cowan P., 1997. A randomized trial of group outpatient visits for chronically ill older HMO members: the Cooperative Health Care Clinic, Journal of American Geriatric Society, 45(5):543–9.
Cayirli, T., and Veral, E., 2003. Outpatient scheduling in health care: a review of literature, Production and Operations Management, 12(4): 519–549.
Declaration of the International Conference on Primary Health Care, 1978. http://www.euro.who.int/AboutWHO/Policy/20010827_1.
Forjuoh, S.N., Averitt, W.M., Cauthen, D.B., Symm, B., and Mitchell M., 2001. Open-access appointment scheduling in family practice: comparison of a demand prediction grid with actual appointments, Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 14(4): 259–265.
Gordon, P., and Chin, M., 2004. Achieving a new standard in primary care for low-income populations: Case Study 2: Advanced Access Learning, The Commonwealth Fund.
Grandinetti, D., 2000. You mean I can see a doctor today? Medical Economics, March 20.
Houck, S., 2004. What works: effective tools and case studies to improve clinical office practice, HealthPress Publishing, Boulder, Colorado, p. 90.
Houck, S., Kilo, C., and Scott. J.C., 2003. Improving patient care. Group visits 101, Family Practice Management, 10(5):66–8.
Institute of Medicine, 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21 st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 51.
Masley, S., Sokoloff, J., and Hawes C., 2000. Planning group visits for high-risk patients, Family Practice Management, 7(6):33–7.
Murray, M., and Berwick, D.M., 2003. Advance access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care. JAMA, 289(8): 1035–1039.
Murray, M., and Tantau, C., 2000. Same-day appointments: exploding the access paradigm, Family Practice Management, 7–8: 45–50.
Nolan T.W., Schall M.W., Berwick D.M., and Roessner J., 1996. Reducing delays and waiting times throughout the healthcare system. Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
O’Hare, C. D., and Corlett, J., 2004. The outcomes of open-access scheduling, Family Practice Management, 11(2):35–8.
Oldham, J., 2001. Advanced access in primary care, National Primary Care Development Team, http://www.npdt.org/AccesstoPrimaryCare/advancedaccess.pdf
Oldham, J., 2002. Telephone use in primary care, British Medical Journal, 325(7363):547.
Starfield B., 1991. Primary care and health. A cross-national comparison, JAMA, 266: 2268–2271.
Wick, A., and Koller, M.T., 2005. Views of patients and physicians on follow-up visits, Swiss Medical Weekly, 135:139–144.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Savin, S. (2006). Managing Patient Appointments in Primary Care. In: Hall, R.W. (eds) Patient Flow: Reducing Delay in Healthcare Delivery. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 91. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33636-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33636-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-33635-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-33636-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)