Advertisement

Integrative Systems View of Life: Perspectives from General Systems Thinking

  • J. Yasha KreshEmail author
Part of the Topics in Biomedical Engineering International Book Series book series (ITBE)

Abstract

The application of systems thinking and the principles of general systems science to problems in the life sciences is not a new endeavor. In the 1960s systems theory and biology attracted the interest of many notable biologists, cyberneticists, mathematicians, and engineers. The avalanche of new quantitative data (genome, proteome, physiome) incited by the boundless advances in molecular and cellular biology has reawakened interest in and kindled rediscovery of formal model-building techniques. The manifold perspectives presented in many ways is a re-embodiment of the general theory of organismic systems and serves as an impetus to suggest that organized complexity can be understood. The particular affinity expressed in this essay is a reflection of how closely my thinking is associated with the thoughts of Ludwig von Bertalanffy, Ervin Laszlo, and Robert Rosen. We are, by all accounts, at the threshold of a postgenomic era that truly belongs to the biology of systems.

Keywords

System Biology Living System Complex Adaptive System Downward Causality General System Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

9. References

  1. 1.
    von Bertalanffy L. 1968. General system theory. George Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heylighen F. 2004. Principia Cybernetica Web (http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be) Center Leo Apostel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Krijgskundestraat 33, B-1160 Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laszlo E, ed. 1972. The relevance of general systems theory. George Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koestler A, Smythes JR, eds. 1968. Beyond reductionism. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kresh JY, Armour JA. 1997. The heart as a self-regulating system: integration of homeodynamic mechanisms. Technol Health Care 5(1):159–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yates E, ed. 1987. Self-organizing systems: the emergence of order. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ashby R. 1956. An introduction to cybernetics. Methuen, New York.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wiener N. 1948. Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Hermann Editions in Paris. MIT Press, Cambridge (2nd ed. 1961, Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCulloch WS. 1965. Embodiments of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foerster H v, Zopf G., eds. 1962. Principles of self-organization. Pergamon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weinberg GM. 1975. An introduction to general systems thinking. Wiley & Sons New York.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kresh JY, Izrailtyan I. 1998. Evolution in functional complexity of heart rate dynamics: a measure of cardiac allograft adaptability. Am J Physiol 275:R720–R727.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simon HA. 1969. The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yates FE. 1993. Self-organizing systems. In The logic of life: the challenge of integrative physiology. Ed. CAR Boyd, D Noble, pp. 189–218. Oxford UP, New York.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Noble D. 2000. Modelling the heart: insights, failures and progress. Bioessays 24:1155–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wolkenhauer O. 2001. Systems biology: the reincarnation of systems theory applied in biology? Briefings in Bioinformatics 2(3):258–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mesarovic MD, ed. 1968. System theory and biology. Springer, New York (see chapter on “System theory and biology: view of a theoretician,” pp. 59–87).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kauffman SA. 1993. The origin of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford UP, New York.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosen R. 1999. Life itself. Columbia UP, New York.Google Scholar

Selected Reading

  1. Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1964. Mathematical theory of communication. U Illinois P, Urbana.Google Scholar
  2. Foerster H v, ed. 1974. The cybernetics of cybernetics. Biological Computer Laboratory Report 73.38, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  3. Hood L, Ideker T, Galitski T. 2001. A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. In Annual review of genomics and human genetics 2001, Vol. 2, pp. 343–372. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto.Google Scholar
  4. Kitano H. 2001. Foundations of systems biology. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. von Bertalanffy L. 1972. Perspectives on general system theory. Ed. E Taschdjian, with forewords by M v Bertalanffy, E Laszlo. George Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Leibler S, Elowitz, MB. 2000. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403:335–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lauffenburger DA. 2000. Cell signaling pathways as control modules: complexity for simplicity? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(10):5031–5033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doyle JC. 2000. Robustness and dynamics in biological networks. In The first international conference on systems biology. MIT Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Prigogine I. 1980. From being to becoming. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  10. Gell-Mann M. 1994. The quark and the jaguar, adventures in the simple and the complex. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Carpa F. 1997. The web of life: a new scientific understanding of living systems. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Human Genome Organization. Human genome project (HGP). http://www.ornl.gov/hgmis/.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery and MedicineDrexel University College of MedicinePhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations