Skip to main content

Conflict Resolution

  • Chapter
Evolutionary Bioinformatics
  • 1164 Accesses

Abstract

The tasks of evolutionary bioinformatics are to identify the forms of information that genomes convey, and show how potential conflicts between different forms are reconciled. Apparent redundancies (e.g. diploidy; Chapter 2), and beliefs in the existence of “neutral” mutations (Chapter 7), and of “junk” DNA (Chapter 12), tended to support the view that there is much vacant genome space, and hence “room for all” in the journey of the genes through the generations. Suggestions that there might be conflicts between different forms of information were not taken too seriously. However, when genomic information was thought of in the same way as the other forms of information with which we arc familiar (sec Chapters 2–4), it became evident that apparent redundancies might actually play important roles — errordetection and correction, and much more. The possibility of conflict could no longer be evaded. The essential argument of this book is that many puzzling features of genomes can best be understood in such terms, as will be emphasized in this and subsequent chapters.

“There would appear to be no reason why the recombinator should not be a sequence which codes in the normal way for amino acids, and that it would therefore be within the genes rather than between them”. Robin Holliday (1968) [1]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Holliday R (1968) Genetic recombination in fungi. In: Peacock WJ. Brock RD (eds) Replication and Recombination of Genetic Material. Australian Academy of Science, Camberra, pp 157–174

    Google Scholar 

  2. Galton F (1876) A theory of heredity. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 5:329–348 [He did not think that the “germs” would be linearly arranged: “It is difficult to suppose the directions of the mutual influences of the germs to be limited to lines, like those that cause the blood corpuscles to become attached face to face, in long rouleaux, when coagulation begins.”]

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schaap T (1971) Dual information in DNA and the evolution of the genetic code. Journal of Theoretical Biology 32:293–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grantham R (1972) Codon base randomness and composition drift in coliphage. Nature New Biology 237:265

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grantham R, Perrin P, Mouchiroud D (1986) Patterns in codon usage of different kinds of species. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 3:48–81

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sharp PM, Stenico M, Peden JF, Lloyd AT (1993) Codon usage: mutational bias, translation selection, or both? Biochemical Society Transactions 21:835–841

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cox EC, Yanofsky C (1967) Altered base ratios in the DNA of an Echerichia coli mutator strain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 58:1895–1902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Muto A, Osawa S (1987) The guanine and cytosine content of genomic DNA and bacterial evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 84: 166–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Forsdyke D R (2004) Regions of relative GC% uniformity are recombinational isolators. Journal of Biological Systems 12:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee J-C, Mortimer JR, Forsdyke DR (2004) Genomic conflict settled in favour of the species rather than of the gene at extreme GC% values. Applied Bioinformatics 3:219–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wada A, Suyama A, Hanai R (1991) Phenomenological theory of GCIAT pressure on DNA base composition. Journal of Molecular Evolution 32:374–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Onofrio G, Bernardi G (1992) A universal compositional correlation among codon positions. Gene 110:81–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Orr HA (2004) A passion for evolution. The New York Review of Books 51: no. 3, pp 27–29

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paz A, Kirzhner Y, Nevo E, Korol A (2006) Coevolution of DNA-interacting proteins and genome “dialect.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 23:56–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lao PJ, Forsdyke DR (2000) Thermophilic bacteria strictly obey Szybalski’s transcription direction rule and politely purine-load RNAs with both adenine and guanine. Genome Research 10:228–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mortimer JR, Forsdyke DR (2003) Comparison of responses by bacteriophage and bacteria to pressures on the base composition of open reading frames. Applied Bioinformatics 2:47–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rayment JH, Forsdyke DR (2005) Amino acids as placeholders. Base composition pressures on protein length in malaria parasites and prokaryotes. Applied Bioinformatics 4:117–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin F-H, Forsdyke DR (2006) Prokaryotes that grow optimally in acid have purine-poor codons in long open reading frames. (submitted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forsdyke, D.R. (2006). Conflict Resolution. In: Evolutionary Bioinformatics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33419-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics