Advertisement

The Political-Economic Gradient and the Organization of Urban Space

  • Robert P. FairbanksII
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

Community has once again become de rigueur in the contemporary moment. Its return to prominence coincides with efforts to transform urban governance through a familiar—yet reinvigorated—celebration of venerable social welfare traditions that have long extolled the virtues of local responsibility. American cities are enduring the transformations of a “postwelfare apotheosis,” driven by (re)cultivated affinities for devolution, welfare state retrenchment, and privatization (Katz, 2001). As historian Michael Katz argues, these trends have culminated in the trifold victory of three great forces in social welfare politics: the war on dependence, the devolution of public authority, and the dominance of market models in public policy. The fallout leads states to increasingly displace misery to already distressed cities; while cities, in turn, are left to displace misery to the streets of poor neighborhoods. In this climate, the rhetoric of community voluntarism is pervasive, locatable in the discourse of entities ranging from nonprofits, to civic associations, to multilevel corporations (Sites, Chaskin, and Parks, 2003).

Keywords

Civil Society Urban Space Community Capacity Poor Neighborhood Chicago School 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso, W. (1971). A theory of the urban land market. In: The Internal Structure of the City, ed. L. Bourne, New York: Oxford, pp. 154–159.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the Street: Decency, Violence and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  3. Anheier, H., Katz, H., Mosley, J., and Hasenfeld, Y. (2003). The State of the Non-Profit and Community Sector in Greater Los Angeles. Los Angeles: UCLA School of Public Policy and Social Research.Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett, D. (1985). Economic Change, Systems of Cities and the “Life Cycle” of Housing. Report to the Department of Housing and Urban Development.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, B. and Kasarda, J. (1977). Contemporary Urban Ecology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism.” In: Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, ed. N. Brenner and N. Theodore, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 2–32.Google Scholar
  7. Brenner, N., Jessop, B., Jones, M., and MacLeod, G. (Eds). (2003). State/Space: A Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Burgess, E.W. (1925). The growth of the city. In: The City, ed. R. Park, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar
  9. Caldeira, T. (1999). Fortified enclaves: The new urban segregation. In: Cities and Citizenship, ed. J. Holston, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 114–138.Google Scholar
  10. Chaskin, R., Brown, P., Venkatesh, S, and Vidal, A. (2001). Building Community Capacity. New York: Aline de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Cruikshank, B. (1999). The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, M. (1990). City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Dear, M. (1976). Abandoned Housing. In: Urban Policy Making and Metropolitan Dynamics, ed. J. Adams, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 59–99.Google Scholar
  14. Dear, M. (2000). The postmodern urban condition. California: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Downs, A. (1974). The successes and failures of federal housing policy. Public Interest 34:124–145.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, B. and Winnick, L. (1951). A reformulation of the filtering concept. Journal of Social Issues 7:47–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In: The Foucault Effect, ed. G. Burchel, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
  18. Furstenberg, F. (1993). How families manage risk and opportunity in dangerous neighborhoods. In: Sociology and the Public Agenda, ed. W.J. Wilson, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 231–258.Google Scholar
  19. Goldstein, D. (2001). Micro-enterprise training programs, neoliberal common sense, and the discourses of self esteem. In: New Poverty Studies: The Ethnography of Power, Politics, and Impoverished People in the United States, ed. J. Goode and J. Maskovsky, New York: New York University Press, pp. 435–469.Google Scholar
  20. Goode, J. and Maskovsky, J. (Eds.). (2001). New Poverty Studies: The Ethnography of Power, Politics, and Impoverished People in the United States. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In: The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. G. Burchel, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
  22. Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Harvey, D. (1977). Government policies, financial institutions and neighborhood change in United States cities. In: Captive Cities: Studies in the Political Economy of Cities and Regions, ed. M. Harloe, London: Wiley & Sons, pp. 123–139.Google Scholar
  24. Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of Hope. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hawley, A. (1981). Urban Society: An Ecological Approach. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Hoover, E. and Vernon, R. (1959). Anatomy of a Metropolis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Horowitz, C.F. (1994). Will American cities dismantle suburban boundaries? The Journal of Social, Political & Economic Studies 19(1):45–68.Google Scholar
  29. Hoyt, H. (1959). The movement of residential neighborhoods. In: Readings in Urban Geography, ed. H. Mayer and C. Kohn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 499–510.Google Scholar
  30. Hunter, A. (1974). Symbolic Communities: The Persistence and Change of Chicago’s Local Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hyatt, S. (2001). From citizen to volunteer. In: New Poverty Studies: The Ethnography of Power, Politics, and Impoverished People in the United States, ed. J. Goode and J. Maskovsky, New York: New York University Press, pp. 435–469.Google Scholar
  32. Hyman, W.A. and Kingsley, T.G. (1996). Transportation and land use. In: Reality and Research: Social Science and U.S. Urban Policy Since 1960, ed. G. Galster, Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
  33. Jackson, K.T. (1985). Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  34. Jackson, P. (1989). Maps of Meaning: An Introduction to Cultural Geography. London: Unwin/Hyman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jargowsky, P.A. (1997). Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American city. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  36. Katz, M. (2001). The Price of Citizenship: Redefining the American Welfare State. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  37. Lefebvre, H. (1974). The Production of Space. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on Cities. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Leon, G. (1985). Ghost Towns, Ghettoes and Gold Coasts: A Sociological Analysis of Housing Abandonment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University.Google Scholar
  40. Liggett, H. and Perry, D. (Eds). (1995). Spatial Practices: Critical Explorations in Spatial Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Low, S. (2001). The edge and the center: Gated communities and the discourse of urban fear. American Anthropologist, 103(1):45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lowry, I.S. (1960). Filtering and housing standards. Land Economics 36:336–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Massey, D. and Denton, N. (1993). American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Merry, S.E. (2001). Spatial governmentality and the new urban social order: Controlling gender violence through law. American Anthropologist, 103(1):16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mueller, K.M. (1977). Analysis of urban blight in a central Texas city. Southwestern Sociological Association Paper 77S06462.Google Scholar
  46. Orum, A. (1996). City Building in America. Boulder CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  47. Paley, J. (2001). Marketing Democracy: Power and Social Movements in Post-Dictatorship Chile. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  48. Park, R.E. (1936). Human ecology. American Journal of Sociology 42(1):1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  50. Rifkin, J. (1995). The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.Google Scholar
  51. Rose, N. (1999). The Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rotenberg, R. (2001). Metropolitanism and the transformation of urban space in nineteenth century colonial metropoles. American Anthropologist, 103(1):7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruben, M. (2001). Suburbanization and urban poverty under neoliberalism. In: New Poverty Studies: The Ethnography of Power, Politics, and Impoverished People in the United States, ed. J. Goode and J. Maskovsky, New York: New York University Press, pp. 435–469.Google Scholar
  54. Rybczynski, W. (1995). Downsizing cities: To make cities work better, make them smaller. The Atlantic Monthly, 276(4):36–44.Google Scholar
  55. Salamon, L.M. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sampson, R.J. (1999). What ‘community’ supplies. In: Urban problems and Community Development, ed. R. Ferguson and W. Dickens, Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press, pp.241–292.Google Scholar
  57. Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S., and Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multi-level study of collective efficacy. Science 277(5238):918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sites, W., Chaskin, R., and Parks, V. (2003). Community organizing, planning, and development at SSA: Remapping the community program. Unpublished document.Google Scholar
  59. Smart, A. (2001). Unruly places: Urban governance and the persistence of illegality in Hong Kong’s urban squatter settlements. American Anthropologist, 103(1):32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, N. (1984). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, N. (1986). Gentrification, the frontier, and the restructuring of urban space. In: Gentrification and the City, ed. N. Smith and P. Williams, Boston: Allen and Unwin, pp. 123–142.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, T.V. and White, L.D. (1929). Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  64. Sternlieb, G. and Hughes, J. (1980). The changing demography of the central city. Scientific American 243(2):48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Suttles, G.D. (1972). The Social Construction of Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  66. Suttles, G.D. (1990). Man-Made City: The Land Use Confidence Game in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  67. Taueber, K. and Taueber, A. (1965). Negroes in Cities: Residential Segregation and Neighborhood Change. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  68. Valverde, M. (1998). Diseases of the Will: Alcohol and the Dilemmas of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Venkatesh, S. (2001). Chicago’s pragmatic planners: American sociology and the myth of community. Social Science History 25(2):276–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilson, W.J. (1987). The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Wilson, W.J. (1996). When Work Disappears: The New World of the Urban Poor. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  72. Wolch, J. (1990). The Shadow State: Government and Voluntary Sector in Action. New York: Foundation Center.Google Scholar
  73. Wolch, J. and Geiger, R.K. (1983). The urban distribution of voluntary resources: An exploratory analysis. Environment and Planning 15:1067–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wolpert, J. (1988). The geography of generosity: Metropolitan disparities in donations and support for amenities. Annals, Association of American Geographers, 78:665–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wolpert, J. (1993). Patterns of Generosity in America: Who’s Holding the Safety Net? New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press.Google Scholar
  76. Wolpert, J. and Reiner, A. (1984). Service provision in the not-for-profit sector: A comparative study. Economic Geography 60:28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wolpert, J., and Reiner, A. (1985). The not-for-profit sector in stable and growing regions. Urban Affairs Quarterly 20:487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zukin, S. (1991). Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disneyworld. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert P. FairbanksII
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations