Advertisement

Self-Help Groups as Participatory Action

  • Thomasina Borkman
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

“You alone can do it, but you cannot do it alone” uniquely captures the combination of self-help (personal responsibility) and mutual aid (interdependence with others) that characterizes voluntary self-help groups (SHGs) and self-help organizations (SHOs). The slogan also emphasizes action, the participatory action of self-help/mutual aid, not organization or form.

Keywords

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Social Movement Social Identity Nonprofit Organization Participatory Action 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bayers, L.S. (2004). Surviving breast cancer: A discourse analysis of breast cancer self-help groups. Adelaide, Australia: University of South Australia, Doctoral dissertation in the Faculty of EducationGoogle Scholar
  2. Beito, D.T. (2000). From Mutual Aid to the Welfare State: Fraternal Societies and Social Services 1890–1967. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, B.M. (1981). The Survival of a Counterculture: Ideological Work and Everyday Life Among Rural Communards. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Borkman, T. (1976). Experiential knowledge: A new concept for the analysis of self-help groups. Social Services Review, 50:445–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borkman, T. (1999). Understanding Self-Help/Mutual Aid: Experiential Learning in the Commons. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Borkman, T. (2004). Self-help groups. In: Philanthropy in America: A Comprehensive Historical Encyclopedia, ed. D.F. Burlingame, Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, pp. 428–432.Google Scholar
  7. Borkman, T. (2005). The methodology of in-depth research with self-help groups. Unpublished manuscript. August 19.Google Scholar
  8. Borkman, T., Karlsson, M., Munn-Giddings, C., and Smith, L. (2005). Self-Help and Mental Health: Case Studies of Mental Health Self-Help Organizations in US, UK, and Sweden. Stockholm, Sweden: Skondal Institute and University.Google Scholar
  9. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Burns, D. and Taylor, M. (1998). Mutual Aid and Self-Help: Coping Strategies for Excluded Communities. West Sussex, UK: Policy.Google Scholar
  11. Chesler, M.A. (1991). Participatory action research with self-help groups: An alternative paradigm for inquiry and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19:757–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chesler, M.A. and Chesney, B.K. (1995). Cancer and Self-Help: Bridging the Troubled Waters of Childhood Illness. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cockerham, W.C. (2002). Medical Sociology (9th edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Conrad, P. and Schneider, J.W. (1992). Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Denzin, N. (1993). The Alcoholic Society: Addiction and Recovery of the Self. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  16. Etzioni, A. (1969). The Semi-Professions and Their Organization: Teachers, Nurses, Social Workers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Forsyth, D.R. (2006). Group Dynamics (4th edn.). Belmont, CA: Thomason/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  18. Fox, R. (1977). The medicalization and demedicalization of American society. Daedalus, 106:9–22.Google Scholar
  19. Guba, E.G. (1990). The Paradigm Dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1983). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. In: Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluations, ed. G.F. Madaus, M. Scrivenand, and D.L. Stufflebean, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, pp. 311–333.Google Scholar
  21. Hastie, N. (1999–2000). Origins and activities of a self-help support center in Nottingham, United Kingdom. International Journal of Self Help & Self Care, 1:123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Horwitz, A.V. (2002). Creating Mental Illness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hughes, E.C. (1971) (1984). The Sociological Eye: Selected Papers. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  24. Humphreys, K. (2004). Circles of Recovery: Self-Help Organizations for Addictions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Irvine, L. (1999). Codependent Forevermore: The Invention of Self in a Twelve Step Group. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Isenberg, D.H., Loomis, C., Humphreys, K., and Maton, K.I. (2004). Self-help research: Issues of power sharing. In: Participatory Community Research: Theories and Methods in Action, ed. L.A. Jason, C.B. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R.R. Taylor, and M.I. Davis, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 123–137).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katz, A.H. (1993). Self-Help in America: A Social Movement Perspective. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
  28. Katz, A.H. and Bender E. (1976). The Strength in US: Self Help Groups in the Modern World. New York: Franklin-Watts.Google Scholar
  29. Kennedy, M. and Humphreys, K. (1994). Understanding worldview transformation in members of mutual help groups. Prevention in Human Services, 11:181–198.Google Scholar
  30. Kennedy, M., Humphreys, K., and Borkman, T. (1994). Naturalistic paradigm as an alternative approach to research with self-help groups. In: Understanding Self-Help Organizations: Frameworks and Findings, ed. T. Powell, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 172–189.Google Scholar
  31. Kloos, B. (1999). Cultivating identity: Meaning-making in the context of residential treatment settings for persons with histories of psychological disorders. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign unpublished PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
  32. Kurtz, L. (1997). Self-Help and Support Groups: A Handbook for Practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Lavoie, F., Farquharson, A., and Kennedy, M. (1994). Workshop on ‘good practice’ in the collaboration between professionals and mutual aid groups. Prevention in Human Services, 11:303–311.Google Scholar
  34. Lincoln, Y.S. and Denzin, N.K. (Eds.) (2003). Turning Points in Qualitative Research: Tying Knots in a Handkerchief. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.Google Scholar
  35. Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. Naturalistic Evaluation, 30:73–84.Google Scholar
  36. Litvak, S. and Martin, D. (1999–2000). The state of the independent living movement. International Journal of Self Help & Self Care, 1:49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Loseke, D.R. (1992). The Battered Woman and Shelters: The Social Construction of Wife Abuse. Albany: The State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  38. Madara, E.J. (1992). The primary value of a self-help clearinghouse. In: Self-Help: Concepts and Applications, ed. A.H. Katz et al., Philadelphia: Charles, pp. 117–124.Google Scholar
  39. Mattingly, C. (1991). Narrative reflections on practical actions: Two learning experiences in reflective storytelling. In: The Reflective Turn: Case Studies in and on Educational Practice, ed. D. Schon, New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, pp. 235–247.Google Scholar
  40. Matzat, J. (2001–2002). The development of self-help groups and support for them in Germany. International Journal of Self Help & Self Care, 1:307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Medvene, L. (1992) Self-help groups, peer helping, and social comparison. In: Helping and Being Helped: Naturalistic Studies, ed. S. Spacapan and S. Oskamp, The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 49–81.Google Scholar
  42. Milofsky, C. and Elworth, J.T. (1985). Charitable associations. In: Issues in the Care of Children with Chronic Illness, ed. N. Hobbs and J.M. Perrin, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 790–810.Google Scholar
  43. Mogren, S. (2002). Into Our Own Hands: The Women’s Health Movement in the United States, 1969–1990. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Munn-Giddings, C. and Borkman, T. (2005). Self-help/mutual aid as a psychosocial phenomenon. In: Mental Health at the Crossroads: The Promise of the Psychosocial Approach, ed. S. Ramon and J. Williams, London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  45. Oka, T. (1994). Self-help groups in Japan: Trends and traditions. In: Self-Help and Mutual Aid Groups: International and Multicultural Perspectives, ed. F. Lavoie, T. Borkman, and B. Gidron, Binghamton, NY: Haworth, pp. 69–95.Google Scholar
  46. Rappaport, J. (1993). Narrative studies, personal stories, and identity transformation in the mutual help context. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29:239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rappaport, J., Seidman, E., Toro, P.A., McFadden, L.S., Reischl, T.M., Roberts, L.J., Salem, D.A., Stein, C.H., and Zimmerman, M.A. (1985). Collaborative Research with a Mutual Help Organization. Social Policy, Winter: 13–24.Google Scholar
  48. Riessman, F. (1990). Restructuring help: A human services paradigm for the 1990’s. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18:221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Riessman, F. and Carroll, D. (1995). Redefining Self-Help: Policy and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  50. Sarason, S. (1972). The Creation of Settings and the Future of Societies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, D.H. (1997). The rest of the nonprofit sector: Grassroots associations as the dark matter ignored in prevailing ‘flat earth’ maps of the sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(2):114–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, D.H. (2000). Grassroots Associations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Turner, J.C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In: Social Identity Context, Commitment, Content, ed. N. Ellemers, R. Spearsand, and B. Doosje, London: Blackwell, pp. 6–34.Google Scholar
  54. Van Til, J. (2000). Growing Civil Society: From Nonprofit Sector to Third Space. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  55. von Appen, U. (1994). The development of self-help in Germany’s new provinces (former East Germany): The case of Schwerin. In: Self-Help and Mutual Aid Groups: International and Multicultural Perspectives, ed. F. Lavoie, T. Borkman, and B. Gidron, Binghamton, NY: Haworth, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
  56. Weitz, R. (2001). The Sociology of Health, Illness, and Health Care: A Critical Approach (2d edn.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.Google Scholar
  57. Wilson, J. (1995). Two Worlds: Self Help Groups and Professionals. Birmingham, UK: British Association of Social Workers.Google Scholar
  58. Wong, D. and Chan, C. (1994). Advocacy on self-help for patients with chronic illness: The Hong Kong experience. In: Self-Help and Mutual Aid Groups: International and Multicultural Perspectives, ed. F. Lavoie, T. Borkman, and B. Gidron, Binghamton, NY: Haworth, pp. 117–139.Google Scholar
  59. Wuthnow, R. (1994). Sharing the Journey: Support Groups and America’s New Quest for Community. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  60. Zola, LK. (1987). The politicization of the self-help movement. Social Policy 18(Fall):32–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomasina Borkman
    • 1
  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfax

Personalised recommendations