Advertisement

Friendship and Community Organization

  • Rebecca G. Adams
  • Koji Ueno
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

Summarizing a collection of chapters describing how the character of civil society has changed over the past fifty years in eight advanced democracies, Putnam (2002) recently observed that mass participation in elections, political parties, unions, and churches has declined. Contrary to his own observations that more people in the United States are now “bowling alone” (Putnam, 2000) however, the contributors to the volume he was summarizing, Democracies in Flux, reported impressionistic evidence that these common declines in formal social capital have been at least partially offset by increases in the “the relative importance of informal, fluid, personal forms of social connection” (p. 411). The contributors to this volume expressed concern that the “new individualistic forms of social engagement may be less conducive to the pursuit of collective goals” (p. 412). Friendship, although not a particularly new form of social engagement, is an example of an individualistic form of it. This makes understanding of the role of friendship in community organization and civic engagement more important now than it would have been during a period when formal social capital was more plentiful. Furthering this understanding is the purpose of this chapter.

Keywords

Social Capital Community Member Community Organization Civic Engagement Friendship Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, R.G. (1989). Conceptual and methodological issues in studying friendships of older adults. In: Older Adult Friendship: Structure and Process, ed. R.G. Adams and R. Blieszner, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 17–41.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, R.G. (1998). The demise of territorial determinism: Online friendships. In: Placing Friendship in Context, ed. R.G. Adams and G. Allan, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–182.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, R.G. and Allan, G.A. (1998). Contextualising friendship. In: Placing Friendship in Context, ed. R.G. Adams and G. Allan, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  4. Adams, R.G. and Blieszner, R. (1993). Resources for friendship intervention. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 20:159–175.Google Scholar
  5. Adams, R.G. and Blieszner, R. (1994). An integrative conceptual framework for friendship research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11:163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Adams, R.G. and Torr, R. (1998). Factors underlying the structure of older adult friendship networks. Social Networks, 20(1):51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Adams, R.G., Ueno, K., and Blieszner, R. (2005). The Adams-Blieszner-Ueno integrative conceptual framework for friendship research. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  8. Akiyama, H., Elliott, K., and Antonucci, T.C. (1996). Same-sex and cross-sex relationships. Journals of Gerontology, 51B:374–382.Google Scholar
  9. Allan, G.A. (1977). Class variations in friendship patterns. British Journal of Sociology, 28:389–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Allan, G.A. (1979). A Sociology of Friendship and Kinship. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. Allan, G.A. and Adams, R.G. (Forthcoming, November 2006). The sociology of friendship. In: The Handbook of 21 st Century Sociology, ed. C.D. Bryant and D.L. Peck, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Aries, E.J. and Johnson, F.L. (1983). Close friendship in adulthood: Conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex Roles, 9:1183–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Axelrod, M. (1956). Urban structure and social participation. American Sociological Review, 21:14–18.Google Scholar
  14. Baxter, L.A. and West, L. (2003). Couple perceptions of their similarities and differences: A dialectical perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20:491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blieszner, R. and Adams, R.G. (1992). Adult Friendship. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Booth, A. and Hess, E. (1974). Cross-sex friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56:38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bridge, K. and Baxter, L.A. (1992). Blended relationships: Friends as work associates. Western Journal of Communication, 56:200–225.Google Scholar
  18. Campbell, K.E. and Marsden, P.V. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 65:482–501.Google Scholar
  19. Chaskin, R.J., Brown, P., Venkatesh, S., and Vidal, A. (2001). Building Community Capacity. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  20. Davidson, L.R. and Duberman, L. (1982). Friendship: Communication and interactional patterns in same-sex dyads. Sex Roles, 8:809–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Donelson, E. and Gullahorn, J.E. (1977). Women: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. de Vries, B. (1991). Friendship and kinship patterns over the life course: A family stage perspective. Caring Communities Proceedings of the Symposium on Social Supports, Statistics, Canada. Catalogue No. 89-514, 99–107.Google Scholar
  23. Dykstra, P.A. (1990). The Next of(Non)Kin. Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  24. Fehr, B. (1996). Friendship Processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Feld, S.L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86:1015–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Feld, S.L. (1982). Social structural determinants of similarity among associates. American Sociological Review, 47:797–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Field, D. (1999). Continuity and change in friendships in advanced old age: Findings from the Berkeley Older Generation Study. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 48:325–346.Google Scholar
  28. Fischer, C.S. (1982). To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fischer, C.S. and Oliker, S.J. (1983). A research note on friendship, gender, and the life cycle. Social Forces, 62:124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fox, M., Gibbs, M., and Auerbach, D. (1985). Age and gender dimensions of friendship. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9:489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gabriel, S. and Gardner, W.L. (1999). Are there ‘his’ and ‘hers’ types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relationship interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77:642–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Granovetter, M.S. (1974). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hawley, A.H. (1950). Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
  34. Hays, R.B. (1988). Friendship. In: Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research and Interventions, ed. S.W. Duck, Oxford, England: Wiley, pp.391–408.Google Scholar
  35. Herek, G.M. and Glunt, E.K. (1995). Identity and community among gay and bisexual men in the AIDS era: Preliminary findings from the Sacramento Men’s Health Study. In: AIDS, Identity, and Community: The HIV Epidemic and Lesbians and Gay Men, ed. G.M. Herek and B. Greene, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 55–84.Google Scholar
  36. Hillery, G.A. (1955). Definitions of community: Areas of agreement. Rural Sociology, 20:111–123.Google Scholar
  37. Hillery, G.A. (1968). Communal Organizations: A Study of Local Societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hogg, M.A. and Hains, S.C. (1998). Friendship and group identification: A new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28:323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hunter, A. (1974). Symbolic Communities: The Persistence and Change of Chicago’s Local Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Jackson, R.M., Fischer, C.S., and Jones, L.C. (1977). The dimensions of social networks. In: Networks and Places, ed. C.S. Fischer, R.M. Jackson, C.A. Stueve, K. Gerson, and L.M. Jones, with M. Baldassare, New York: Free Press, pp. 39–58.Google Scholar
  41. Janis, I.L. (1972). Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Oxford, UK: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  42. Janowitz, M. (1967 [1952]). The Community Press in an Urban Setting: The Social Elements of Urbanism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Jehn, K.A., and Shah, P.P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72:775–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jones, D.C. (1991). Friendship satisfaction and gender: An examination of sex differences in contributors to friendship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8:167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kalmijn, M. (2002). Sex segregation and friendship networks: Individual and structural determinants of having cross-sex friends. European Sociological Review, 18:101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kalmijn, M. (2003). Shared friendship networks and the life course: An analysis of survey data on married and co-habiting couples. Social Networks, 25:231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kalmijn, M. and van Groenou, M.B. (2005). Differential effects of divorce on social integration. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22:455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kapferer, B. (1969). Norms and the manipulation of relationships in a work context. In: Social Networks in Urban Situations, ed. JC. Mitchell, Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, pp. 181–244.Google Scholar
  49. Kephart, W.M. (1950). A quantitative analysis of intergroup relationships. American Journal of Sociology, 54:544–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Krackhardt, D. and Kilduff, M. (1990). Friendship patterns and culture: The control of organizational diversity. American Anthropologist, 92:142–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kurth, S.B. (1970). Friendships and friendly relations. In: Social Relationships, ed. G. McCall, M.M. McCall, N.K. Denzin, G.D. Suttles, and S.B. Kurth, Chicago: Aldine, pp. 136–170).Google Scholar
  52. Laumann, E O. (1973). Bonds of Pluralism. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Levesque, M.J., Steciuk, M., and Ledley, C. (2002). Self-disclosure patterns among well-acquainted individuals: Disclosers, confidants and unique relationships. Social Behavior and Personality, 30:519–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Liu, Q.A., Ryan, V., Aurbach, H., and Besser, T. (1998). The influence of local church participation on rural community attachment. Rural Sociology, 63:432–450.Google Scholar
  55. Lively, K.J. (2000). Reciprocal emotion management: Working together to maintain stratification in private law firms. Work & Occupations, 27:32–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McMillan, D.W. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24:315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McMillan, D.W. and Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14:6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27:415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  60. Mendelson, M.J. and Kay, A.C. (2003). Positive feelings in friendship: Does imbalance in the relationship matter? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20:101–116.Google Scholar
  61. Mitchell, J.C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In: Social Networks in Urban Situations, ed. J.C. Mitchell, Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
  62. Murray, S.O. (1992). Components of gay community in San Francisco. In: Gay Culture in America, ed. G. Herdt, Boston: Beacon, pp. 107–146.Google Scholar
  63. Nahemow, L. and Lawton, M.P. (1975). Similarity and propinquity in friendship formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32:205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nardi, P.M. (1999). Gay Men’s Friendships: Invincible Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  65. Neff, K.D. and Harter, S. (2003). Relationship styles of self-focused autonomy, other-focused connectedness, and mutuality across multiple relationship contexts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20:81–99.Google Scholar
  66. O’Boyle, C.G. and Thomas, M.D. (1996). Friendships between lesbian and heterosexual women. In: Lesbian Friendships: For Ourselves and Each Other. The Cutting Edge: Lesbian Life and Literature, ed. J.S. Weinstock, New York: New York University Press, pp. 240–248.Google Scholar
  67. O’Connor, P. (1998). Women’s friendships in a post-modern world. In: Placing Friendship in Context, ed. R.G. Adams and G.A. Allan, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–135.Google Scholar
  68. Oliker, S.J. (1989). Best Friends and Marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  69. Paine, R. (1969). In search of friendship: An exploratory analysis in “middle-class” culture. Man, 4:505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Paxton, P. and Moody, J. (2003). Structure and sentiment: Explaining emotional attachment to group. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66:34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Perkinson, M.A. and Rockemann, D.D. (1996). Older women living in a community care retirement community: Marital status and friendship formation. Journal of Women and Aging, 8(3–4): 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Planalp, S. and Benson, A. (1992). Friends’ and acquaintances’ conversations I: Perceived differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9:483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  74. Putnam, R.D. (2002). Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Putnam, R.D. and Goss, K.A. (2002). Introduction. In: Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, ed. R.D. Putnam, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
  76. Roberto, K.A. (1996). Friendships between older women: Interactions and reactions. Journal of Women and Aging, 8:55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the Self. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  78. Sapadin, L.A. (1988). Friendship and gender: Perspectives of professional men and women. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 5:387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Seeley, E.A., Gardner, W.L., Pennington, G., and Gabriel, S. (2003). Circle of friends or members of a group? Sex differences in relational and collective attachment to groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6:251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sigelman, L. and Welch, S. (1993). The contact hypothesis revisited: Black-white interaction and positive racial attitudes. Social Forces, 71:781–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith, T.W. (2002). Measuring inter-racial friendships. Social Science Research, 31, 576–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Suttles, G.D. (1970). Friendship as a social institution. In: Social Relationships, ed. G. McCall, M.M. McCall, N.K. Denzin, G.D. Suttles, and S.B. Kurth, Chicago: Aldine, pp. 95–135.Google Scholar
  83. Tesch, S.A., and Martin, R.R. (1983). Friendship concepts of young adults in two age groups. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary & Applied, 115:7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thomas, G. and Fletcher, G J.O. (2003). Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85:1079–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Thomas, L. (1987). Friendship. Synthese, 72:217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ueno, K. and Adams, R.G. (2006). Adult friendship: A decade review. In: Close Relationships, ed. P. Noller and J. Feeney, Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology, pp. 151–169.Google Scholar
  87. Usui, W.M. (1984). Homogeneity of friendship networks of elderly blacks and whites. Journal of Gerontology, 39:350–56.Google Scholar
  88. Van Duijn, M.A.J., Zeggelink, E.P.H., Huisman, M., Stokman, F.N., and Wasseur, F.W. (2003). Evolution of sociology freshmen into a friendship network. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27:153–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Veniegas, R.C. and Peplau, L.A. (1997). Power and the quality of same-sex friendships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21:279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Verbrugge, L.M. (1977). The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces, 56:576–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Walker, K. (1995). Always there for me: Friendship patterns and expectations among middle-and working-class men and women. Sociological Forum, 10:213–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Warren, R.L. (1987 [1963]). The Community in America. Lanham, MA: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  93. Willmott, P. (1987). Friendship Networks and Social Support. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  94. Wister, A.V. and Avison, W.R. (1982). “Friendly persuasion”: A social network analysis of sex differences in marijuana use. The International Journal of Addictions, 17:523–541.Google Scholar
  95. Wright, E.O. and Cho, D. (1992). The relative permeability of class boundaries to cross-class friendships: A comparative study of the United States, Canada, Sweden, and Norway. American Sociological Review, 57:85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wright, P.H. (1982). Men’s friendships, women’s friendships, and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 5:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wuthnow, R. (2002). Religious involvement and status-bridging social capital. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47:669–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ying, Y.W., Lee, P.A., Tsai, J.L., Hung, Y., Lin, M., and Wan, C.T. (2001). Asian American college students as model minorities: An examination of their overall competence. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7:59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca G. Adams
    • 1
  • Koji Ueno
    • 2
  1. 1.University of North CarolinaGreensboro
  2. 2.Florida State UniversityFlorida

Personalised recommendations