Advertisement

Chinampa Cultivation in the Basin of Mexico

Observations on the evolution of form and function
  • Charles D. Frederick
Part of the Studies in Human Ecology and Adaptation book series (STHE, volume 3)

Abstract

Chinampa agriculture is one of the best known, yet least studied forms of intensive agriculture in Latin America. Despite the voluminous literature concerning this productive means of cultivation (e.g. Rojas 1983, 1985; Jimenez-Osorino et al., 1990) archaeological investigations of chinampa agriculture are virtually nonexistent. A few researchers have examined chinampas directly (most notably Avila 1991; 1992; Parsons et al., 1982; 1985), but their emphasis was generally on settlement, rather than the fields themselves (e.g. Parsons et al., 1982; 1985; Javier 1996; Corona 1996). Other than Avila’s precocious work, large scale studies of chinampas (as opposed to chinampa settlements) do not exist. The richness of the written record concerning chinampa agriculture has probably restrained field inquiry to some extent. However, as I intend to show, existing studies rarely exploit the fertile ground that lies between the written accounts and the archaeological realities. The history of chinampa agriculture is largely unknown, and awaits focussed and detailed study. Although we think we understand how these fields were constructed and maintained and what plants were grown on them, archaeological evidence of these attributes is minimal. The data summarized in this paper indicate that chinampa construction was considerably more variable than is traditionally recognized. Furthermore, the claims extending chinampa agriculture into the period before the Postclassic are currently unsupported by direct field evidence. In essence, my point is that we know precious little about the prehistory of chinampa agriculture.

Keywords

Construction Method Sediment Source Lake Bottom Construction Technique Northern Basin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous, 1723. Relacion breve y verdadera de algunas cosas de los muchas que sucedieronal Padre Alonso Ponce en las provincias de la Nueva Espaiia, book 13, chapter 32. Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  2. Armillas, Pedro, 1971. Gardens on Swamps. Science 174:653–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avila Lopez, Raul, 1991. Chinampas de Iztapalapa, D. F. Coleccion Cientifica Numero 225, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, MCxico, D. F.Google Scholar
  4. Avila Lopez, Raul, 1992. Arqueologia de chinampas en Iztapalapa. In Chinampas Prehispanicas, edited by Carlos Javier Gonzdez, pp. 81–154. Antologias, Serie Arqueologia, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, México, D. F.Google Scholar
  5. Brumfiel, Elisabeth and Frederick, Charles D., 1992. Xaltocan: Centro Regional de la Cuenca de Mexico. Consejo de Arqueologia Boletin 1991, pp. 24–30, Mexico, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia.Google Scholar
  6. Calnek, Edward E., 1972. Settlement pattern and chinampa agriculture at Tenochtitlan. American Antiquity 37: 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coe, Michael D., 1964. The Chinampas of Mexico. Scientific American 260:90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corona M., Eduardo, 1996. “El Japon”, Xochimilco: anális arqueozoológico de un sitio en la época de la Conquista. Arqueologia 16:93–107.Google Scholar
  9. Frederick, Charles D., Winsborough, Barbara, And Popper, Virginia S., n.d. Geoarchaeological Investigations in the Northern Basin of Mexico. In Postclassic Xaltocan:Ecological and Social Determinance in the Basin of Mexico, edited by Elizabeth Brumfiel, pp. 70–108. Memoirs in Latin American Archeology, Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  10. Frederick, Charles D., 1997. Landscape Change and Human Settlement in the Southeastem Basin of Mexico. Unpublished grant report to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.Google Scholar
  11. Gomez-Pompa, Arturo, 1978. An old answer to the future. Mazingira 5, Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Grove, David C., 1965. Floating Garden Agriculture. The Masterkey 39: 23–29.Google Scholar
  13. Javier Gonzalez, Carlos, 1996. Investigaciones arqueológicas en “El Japon”: sitio chinampero en Xochimilco. Arqueologia 16:81–93.Google Scholar
  14. Jimenez-Osorino, Juan J., Rojas Rabiela, Teresa, Amo Rodriguez, Silvia De, And Gomez-Pompa, Arturo, 1990. Pasado, Presente y Futuro de las Chinampas. Reportes de Sostenibilidad Maya, No. 1, Sostenibilidad Maya, Riverside California, 35 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Moriarty, James Robert, 1968. Floating Gardens (Chinampas) Agriculture in the old lakes of Mexico. América Indígena 28(2): 461–484.Google Scholar
  16. Nichols, D. N. and Frederick, C. D., 1993. Irrigation Canals and Chinampas: Recent Research in the Northern Basin of Mexico. Research in Economic Anthropology, Supplement 7, Barry Isaacs and Vernon Scarborough, editors, pp. 123–150.Google Scholar
  17. Outerbridge, Thomas, 1987. The disappearing chinampas of Xochimilco. The Ecologist 17:76–83.Google Scholar
  18. Parsons, Jeffrey R., Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., Parsons, Mary H., Popper, Virginia, and Taft, Mary, 1982. La Agricultura Chinampera del Periodo Prehispánico Tardío en el Lago Chalco-Xochimilco México. Unpublished report to the Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, México, D. F., and the Nation Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Parsons, Jeffrey R., Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., Parsons, Mary H., Popper, Virginia, and Taft, Mary, 1985. Chinampa agriculture and Aztec urbanization in the Valley of Mexico. In Prehistoric Intensive Agriculture in the Tropics, Part i, edited by I. S. Farrington, pp. 49–96. BAR International Series 232, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  20. Popper, Virginia S., 1995. Nahua Plant Knowledge and Chinampa Farming in the Basin of Mexico: A Middle Postclassic Case Study. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  21. Quintero, Lauro Gonzalez, and Sanchez Sanchez, Jesus Evaristo, 1991. Sobre la existencia de chinampas y el manejo del recursos agricola-hidráulico. In Teotihuacan 1980–1982: Nuevas Interpretuciones, edited by Rubén Cabrera Castro, Ignacio Rodriguez Garcia, and Noel Morelos Garcia, pp. 345–375. Coleccion Cientifica, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, México, D. F.Google Scholar
  22. Rojas Rabiela, Teresa, 1983. La Agricultura Chinampera, Compilacion Historica. Coleción Cuadernos Universitarios, Serie Agronomia, No. 7, Universidad Audnoma Chapingo, Mexico.Google Scholar
  23. Rojas Rabiela, Teresa, 1984. La Tecnologia Indigena de Construcción de Chinampas en la Cuenca de México. Civilización 2: 13–48.Google Scholar
  24. Rojas Rabiela, Teresa, 1985. La Technologia Agricola Mesoamericana en el Siglo XVI. In Historia de la Agricultura Epoca Prehispánica-Siglo XVI 1, edited by T. Rojas R. and W. T. Sanders, pp. 129–231. Coleccion Biblioteca del INAH, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico.Google Scholar
  25. Sanders, William T., Parsons, Jeffrey R., And Santley, Robert S., 1971. The Basin of Mexico: Ecological Processes in the Evolution of a Civilization. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Serra Puche, Mar1 Carmen, 1988. Los Recursos Lacustres de la Cuenca de México Durante el Formativo. Coleccion Posgrado, Coordinación General de Estudios de Posgrado, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, México, D. F.Google Scholar
  27. Sluyter, Andrew, 1994. Intensive Wetland Agriculture in Mesoamerica: Space, Time and Form. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84(4): 557–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, C. Earle, Jr. 1985. Agricultural intinsification in the Mexican highlands. In Prehistoric Intensive Agriculture in the Tropics, Part ii, edited by I. S. Farrington, pp. 501–520. BAR International Series 232, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  29. Tolstoy, P., 1975. Settlement and Population Trends in the Basin of Mexico (Ixtapaluca and Zacatenco Phases). Journal of Field Archaeology 2:23 1–349.Google Scholar
  30. Vargas Machuca, B. De, 1599. Milicia y descripcidn de las Yndias. Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  31. Webster’s Third New Intemational Dictionary, 1986. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., Chicago.Google Scholar
  32. Wilken, Gene C., 1985. A note on the buoyancy and other dubious characteristics of the “floating” chinampas of Mexico. In Prehistoric Intensive Agriculture in the Tropics, Part i, edited by I. S. Farrington, pp. 31–48. BAR International Series 232, Oxford, England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles D. Frederick
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Geography and the EnvironmentUniversity of Texas at AustinAustin

Personalised recommendations