Advertisement

Selection of Software and Hardware

  • Kathryn J. Hannah
  • Marion J. Ball
  • Margaret J.A. Edwards
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Abstract

The installation of a clinical information system does not just happen, nor is it a mysterious process. The process starts with identifying a need, conducting a feasibility analysis, creating a selection team who gathers information and develops vision and goals, promoting executive buy-in and funding commitments. After a clear vision and goals are identified, a request for proposal (RFP) is sent out to the vendor field. Vendor responses are evaluated, site visits and on-site vendor fairs are arranged, and the system selection decision is made. While the contract is being negotiated, funding is confirmed and an implementation team is formed. The implementation team configures the system, deploys it to users, and evaluates and maintains the system. This entire process from initial idea to deployment is summarized in Figure 14.1.

Keywords

Site Visit Clinical Information System Clinical System Implementation Team Infrastructure Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clough, G.C. (1997). Getting the right system: The CHIPS experience. In: Gerdin, U., M. Tallberg, & P. Wainwright (eds.) Nursing Informatics: The Impact of Nursing Knowledge on Healthcare Informatics. Amsterdam: IOS Press, p. 569. Google Scholar
  2. Hunt, E., Breckenridge-Sproat, S., & Kitzmiller R. (2004). The Nursing Informatics Implementation Guide. New York: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
  3. Jenkins, S. (2000). Nurses’ responsibilities in the implementation of information systems. In: Ball, M.J., Hannah, K.J., Newbold, S.K., & Douglas, J.V. (eds.) Nursing Informatics: Where Caring and Technology Meet, 3rd ed. New York: Springer Verlag, p. 211. Google Scholar
  4. Manning, J., & McConnell, E.A. (1997). Technology assessment: A framework for generating questions useful in evaluating nursing information systems. Computers in Nursing 15(3):141–146. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Marreel, R.D., & McLellan, J.M. (1999). Information Management in Healthcare. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar
  6. Mills, M.E. (1995). Nursing participation in the selection of HIS. In: Ball, M.J., K.J. Hannah, S.K. Newbold, & J.V. Douglas (eds.) Nursing Informatics: Where Caring and Technology Meet, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, pp. 233–240. Google Scholar
  7. Staggers, N., & Repko, K.B. (1996). Strategies for successful clinical information system selection. Computers in Nursing 14(3):146–147. 155. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Welebob, E.M. (2000). Nursing informatics consultancy: how to select a nursing informatics consultant. In: Ball, M.J., K.J. Hannah, S.K. Newbold, & J.V. Douglas (eds.) Nursing Informatics: Where Caring and Technology Meet, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, pp. 179–180. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn J. Hannah
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marion J. Ball
    • 3
    • 4
  • Margaret J.A. Edwards
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.President, Hannah Educational & Consulting Services, Inc.CalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Professor, Department of Community Health Science Faculty of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.Vice President, Clinical Informatics StrategiesHealthlink, an IBM companyBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Professor, Johns Hopkins University School of NursingBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Professor and Coordinator, Graduate Programs Centre for Nursing and Health StudiesAthabasca UniversityAthabascaCanada
  6. 6.President, Margaret J.A. Edwards & Associates, Inc.CalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations