Abstract

Identity theory grows out of structural symbolic interaction (Stryker [1980] 2002). Two features that are particularly important in structural symbolic interaction are society and self. Society is viewed as a stable and orderly structure as reflected in the patterned behavior within and between social actors. When we look at the patterned behavior across social actors and see how these patterns fit with the patterns of other social actors, we find larger interindividual patterns that constitute the core of social structure. While actors are creating social structure, they are also receiving feedback from the social structure that influences their behavior. In this way, actors are always embedded in the very social structure that they are simultaneously creating.

Keywords

Identity Theory Identity Discrepancy Role Identity Identity Verification Identity Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, Roger. 1965. Social Psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Burke, Peter J. 1980. “The Self: Measurement Implications from a Symbolic Interactionist Perspective.” Social Psychology Quarterly 43: 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —. 1991. “Identity Processes and Social Stress.” American Sociological Review 56: 836–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. —. 1996. “Social Identities and Psychosocial Stress.” Pp. 141–174 in Psychosocial Stress: Perspectives on Structure, Theory, Life Course, and Methods, edited by H. B. Kaplan. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. —. 2004. “Identities and Social Structure: The 2003 Cooley-Mead Award Address.” Social Psychology Quarterly 67: 5–15.Google Scholar
  6. Burke, Peter J., and Alicia D. Cast. 1997. “Stability and Change in the Gender Identities of Newly Married Couples.” Social Psychology Quarterly 60: 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke, Peter J., and Donald C. Reitzes. 1981. “The Link between Identity and Role Performance.” Social Psychology Quarterly 44: 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. —. 1991. “An Identity Theory Approach to Commitment.” Social Psychology Quarterly 54: 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke, Peter J., and Jan E. Stets. 1999. “Trust and Commitment through Self-Verification.” Social Psychology Quarterly 62: 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cast, Alicia D., Jan E. Stets, and Peter J. Burke. 1999. “Does the Self Conform to the Views of Others?” Social Psychology Quarterly 62: 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eagly, Alice H., and Steven J. Karau. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109: 573–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellestad, June, and Jan E. Stets. 1998. “Jealousy and Parenting: Predicting Emotions from Identity Theory.” Sociological Perspectives 41: 639–668.Google Scholar
  13. Harter, Susan, and Nancy Rumbaugh Whitesell. 1989. “Development Changes in Children’s Understanding of Single, Multiple, and Blended Emotion Concepts.” Pp. 81–116 in Children’s Understanding of Emotion, edited by C. Saarni and P.L. Harris. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. James, William. 1890. Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  15. Kemper, Theodore D. 1991. “Predicting Emotions from Social Relations.” Social Psychology Quarterly 54: 330–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lazarus, Richard S., and Susan Folkman. 1984. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Leith, Karen P., and Roy F. Baumeister. 1998. “Empathy, Shame, Guilt, and Narratives of Interpersonal Conflicts: Guilt-Prone People Are Better at Perspective Taking.” Journal of Personality 66: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lovaglia, Michael J., and Jeffrey A. House. 1996. “Emotional Reactions and Status in Groups.” American Sociological Review 61: 867–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mandler, George. 1975. Mind and Emotion. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. McCall, George J. 2003. “The Me and the Not-Me: Positive and Negative Poles of Identity.” Pp. 11–25 in Advances in Identity Theory and Research, edited by P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, and P. A. Thoits. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  21. McCall, George J., and J. L. Simmons. 1978. Identities and Interactions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Peterson, Christopher, Steven F. Maier, and Martin E. P. Seligman. 1993. Learned Helplessness: A Theory for the Age of Personal Control. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Powers, William T. 1973. Behavior: The Control of Perception. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  24. Serpe, Richard T., and Sheldon Stryker. 1987. “The Construction of Self and Reconstruction of Social Relationships.” Pp. 41–66 in Advances in Group Processes, edited by E. Lawler and B. Markovsky. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  25. Stets, Jan E. 2003. “Justice, Emotion, and Identity Theory.” Pp. 105–122 in Advances in Identity Theory and Research, edited by P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, and P. A. Thoits. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  26. —. 2004. “Emotions in Identity Theory: The Effect of Status.” Advances in Group Processes 21: 51–76.Google Scholar
  27. —. 2005. “Examining Emotions in Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 39–74.Google Scholar
  28. Stets, Jan E., and Peter J. Burke. 1994. “Inconsistent Self-Views in the Control Identity Model.” Social Science Research 23: 236–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. —. 1996. “Gender, Control, and Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 59: 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. —. 2000. “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 63: 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. —. 2005a. “Identity Verification, Control, and Aggression in Marriage.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 160–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. —. 2005b. “New Directions in Identity Control Theory.” Advances in Group Processes 22: 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stets, Jan E., and Michael J. Carter. 2006. “The Moral Identity: A Principle Level Identity.” In Purpose, Meaning, and Action: Control Systems Theories in Sociology, edited by K. McClelland and T. J. Fararo. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Stets, Jan E., and Teresa Tsushima. 2001. “Negative Emotion and Coping Responses within Identity Control Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 64: 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stryker, Sheldon. 1987a. “Identity Theory: Developments and Extensions.” Pp. 89–104 in Self and Identity: Psychological Perspectives, edited by K. Yardley and T. Honess. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. —. 1987b. “The Interplay of Affect and Identity: Exploring the Relationships of Social Structure, Social Interaction, Self, and Emotion.” Presented at the American Sociological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  37. —. [1980] 2002. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.Google Scholar
  38. —. 2004. “Integrating Emotion into Identity Theory.” Advances in Group Processes 21: 1–23.Google Scholar
  39. Stryker, Sheldon, and Peter J. Burke. 2000. “The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 63: 284–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stryker, Sheldon, and Richard T. Serpe. 1982. “Commitment, Identity Salience, and Role Behavior: A Theory and Research Example.” Pp. 199–218 in Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior, edited by W. Ickes and E. S. Knowles. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. —. 1994. “Identity Salience and Psychological Centrality: Equivalent, Overlapping, or Complementary Concepts?” Social Psychology Quarterly 57: 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Swann, William B., Jr., and Craig A. Hill. 1982. “When Our Identities Are Mistaken: Reaffirming Self-Conceptions Through Social Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43: 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Swann, William B., Jr., Peter J. Rentfrow, and Jennifer S. Guinn. 2003. “Self-Verification: The Search for Coherence.” Pp. 367–383 in Handbook of Self and Identity, edited by M. R. Leary and J. P. Tangney. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  44. Tangney, June Price, and Rhonda L. Dearing. 2002. Shame and Guilt. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  45. Tangney, June Price, Rowland S. Miller, Laura Flicker, and Deborah Hill Barlow. 1996. “Are Shame, Guilt, and Embarrassment Distinct Emotions?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 1256–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thamm, Robert. 2004. “Towards a Universal Power and Status Theory of Emotion.” Advances in Group Processes 21: 189–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thoits, Peggy A. 1983. “Multiple Identities and Psychological Well-Being: A Reformulation and Test of the Social Isolation Hypothesis.” American Sociological Review 49: 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. —. 1991. “On Merging Identity Theory and Stress Research.” Social Psychology Quarterly 54: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. —. 2003. “Personal Agency in the Accumulation of Multiple Role-Identities.” Pp. 179–194 in Advances in Identity Theory and Research, edited by P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, and P. A. Thoits. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  50. Tsushima, Teresa, and Peter J. Burke. 1999. “Levels, Agency, and Control in the Parent Identity.” Social Psychology Quarterly 62: 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walster, Elaine, George Walster, and Ellen Berscheid. 1978. Equity Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan E. Stets
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of CaliforniaRiverside

Personalised recommendations