Advertisement

Clinical PET pp 146-161 | Cite as

Artifacts in FDG-PET

  • Tomio Inoue
  • Noboru Oriuchi
  • E. Edmund Kim

Abstract

As the number of clinical positron emission tomography (PET) units is increasing, interpretation of PET images requires a knowledge of the possible pitfalls that may occur due to artifacts and mimic pathology. These artifacts may be caused by various factors such as injection, attenuation material, image reconstruction, contamination, patient movement, and pathologic variants (Table 9.1).1

Keywords

Positron Emission Tomography Positron Emission Tomography Image Attenuation Correction Axial Body Streak Artifact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cook GJR, Maisey MN, Fogelman I. Normal variants, artifacts and interpretable pitfalls in PET imaging with 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose and carbon-11 methionine. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26: 1363–1378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alibazoglu H, Megremis D, Ali A, et al. Injection artifact on FDG-PET imaging. Clin Nucl Med 1998; 23: 264–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Minn H, Nuutila P, Lindholm P, et al. In vivo effects of insulin on tumor and skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in patients with lymphoma. Cancer 1994; 73: 1490–1498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goerres GW, Ziegler SI, Burger C, et al. Artifacts at PET and PET/CT caused by metallic hip prosthetic material. Radiology 2003; 226: 577–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhuang H, Chacko TK, Hickeson M, et al. Persistent non-specific FDG uptake on PET imaging following hip arthroplasty. Eur J Nucl Med 2002; 29: 1328–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engel H, Steinert H, Buck A, et al. Whole-body PET: physiological and artifactual fluorodeoxyglucose accumulations. J Nucl Med 1996; 37: 441–446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heiba SI, Luo J, Sadek S, et al. Attenuation-correction induced artifact in F-18 FDG-PET imaging following total knee replacement. Clin Positron Imaging 2000; 3: 237–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nuyts J, Michel C, Dupont P. Maximum likelihood expectation: maximization reconstruction of sinograms with arbitrary noise distribution using NEC-transformation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20: 365–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miradli F, Vessell H, Faulharber P, et al. Elimination of artifactual FDG in PET imaging of colorectal cancer. Clin Nucl Med 1998; 23: 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Ling CC, et al. Effect of respiratory gating on reducing lung motion artifact in PET imaging of lung cancer. Med Phys 2000; 29: 366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cook GJR, Fogelman I, Maisey MN. Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of F-18 deoxyglucose PET: potential for error in interpretation. Semin Nucl Med 1996; 26: 308–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kubota R, Kubota K, Yamada S, et al. Methionine uptake by tumor tissue: a microautoradiographic comparison with FDG. J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 484492.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomio Inoue
  • Noboru Oriuchi
  • E. Edmund Kim

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations