Is photography art? That is a question that has been debated for many years. One definition of a work of art is that it is a formalized expression of experience as seen through a personality. If that is the case, then a well-executed photograph can certainly be a work of art. Although a photographer does not have as much freedom to interpret as a painter does, a photograph can certainly interpret a scene. Two photographers can record the same scene in totally different ways.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Falk, D. S., Brill, D. R., and Stork, D. G. (1986). Seeing the Light. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Chapters 4, 11.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, E. N. (1984). Photographic Science. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- Newhall, B. (1964). The History of Photography. New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar