Skip to main content

EMS Studies at the Individual, Patch, and Landscape Scale: Designing Landscapes to Measure Scale-Specific Responses to Habitat Fragmentation

  • Chapter
Landscape Ecology of Small Mammals

Abstract

Ecologists have long recognized that the habitats of species are patchy at some spatial scale, that habitats vary in quality, and that most populations exhibit substantial demographic and spatial structure that is, in some way, related to this variability. Inequalities in the capacity of local habitat patches to produce or absorb dispersing individuals creates a regional population dynamic with a hierarchical demographic component—birth and death schedules often reflect local conditions, and the emigration and immigration of individuals over sites reflects regional or landscape ones (Pulliam 1988, Tilman et al. 1994). Differences in the quality of local habitats tend to increase the variability in species abundances over sites, whereas dispersal (immigration and emigration) of individuals among sites can even it out (Vance 1984, Bowers and Dooley 1991). Connecting processes working at the local, metapopulation, and regional scales has become a goal of landscape ecology (Forman and Godron 1986, Turner 1989, Noss 1991, Wiens 1995). Hence, despite the original intent of landscape ecology to be holistic (Forman and Godron 1986, Pickett and Cadenasso 1995), predictions about landscape-level processes are becoming increasingly specific and mechanistic (Wiens et al. 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Barrett, G.W., J.D. Peles, and E.P. Odwin. 1997. Transcending processes and the levels-of-organization concept. Bioscience 47: 531–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, A.J. 1986. Does herbivory benefit plants? A review. American Naturalist 127: 870–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M.A. 1994. Dynamics of age-and habitat-structured populations. Oikos 69: 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M.A., and J.L. Dooley, Jr. 1991. Role of habitat mosaics on the outcome of two-species competition. Oikos 60: 180–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M.A., and J.L. Dooley, Jr. 1993. Predation hazard and seed removal by small mammals: microhabitat versus patch scale effects. Oecologia 94: 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M.A., K. Gregario, C.J. Brame, S.F. Matter, and J.L. Dooley, Jr. 1996a. Use of space and habitats by meadow voles at the home range, patch and landscape scales. Oecologia 105: 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M.A., S.F. Matter, J.L. Dooley, Jr., J.L. Dauten, and J.A. Simkins. 19966. Controlled experiments of habitat fragmentation: a simple computer simulation and a test using small mammals. Oecologia 108: 182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M.A., and S.F. Matter. 1997. Landscape ecology of mammals: relationships between density and patch size. Journal of Mammalogy 78: 999–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, A., and W.Z. Lidicker, Jr. 1983. Microhabitat heterogeneity and population ecology of an herbivorous rodent, Microtus californicus Oecologia 59: 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R.J., and G.W. Barrett. 1997. Effects of habitat fragmentation on medow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) population dynamics in experimental landscape patches. Landscape Ecology 12: 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desy, E.A., and G.O. Batzli. 1989. Effects of food availability and predation on prairie vole demography: a field experiment. Ecology 70: 411–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diffendorfer, J.E., R.D. Holt, N.A. Slade, and M.S. Gaines. 1995a. Small mammal community patterns in old fields. Pages 421–465 in M.L. Cody and J.A. Smallwood, editors. Long-term studies of vertebrate communities. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diffendorfer, J.E., M.S. Gaines, and R.D. Holt. 1995b. Habitat fragmentation and movements of three small mammals (Sigmodon, Microtus, and Peromyscus). Ecology 76: 827–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diffendorfer, J.E., N.A. Slade, M.S. Gaines, and R.D. Holt. 1995c. Population dynamics of small mammals in fragmented and continuous old field habitat. Pages 175–199 in W.Z. Lidicker, Jr., editor. Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, J.L., Jr., and M.A. Bowers. 1996. Influences of patch size and microhabitat on the demography of two old-field rodents. Oikos 75: 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, J.L., Jr., and M.A. Bowers. 1998. Demographic responses of Microtus pennsylvanicus to habitat fragmentation: experimental tests at the landscape and patch scale. Ecology 79: 969–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L., and G. Merriam. 1985. Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66: 1762–1768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R.G., and F.A. Pitelka. 1984. Resource limitation in populations of the California vole. Ecology 65: 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T., and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J., and M.S. Gaines. 1991. The effects of a successional habitat mosaic on a small mammal community. Ecology 72: 1358–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R.H., B.T. Milne, M.G. Turner, and R.V. O’Neill. 1987. Neutral models for analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz, L.L. 1985. Habitats. Pages 286–309 in R. H. Tamarin, editor. Biology of New World Microtus. American Society of Mammalogists Special Publication No. 8. Goodman, D. 1987. Consideration of stochastic demography in the design and management of biological reserves. Natural Resources Modeling 1: 205–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila, Y., I.K. Hanski, and S. Raivio. 1993. Turnover of breeding birds in small forest fragments: the “sampling” colonization hypothesis corroborated. Ecology 74: 714–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I., and M. Gilpin. 1991. Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, L. 1989. Predation in heterogeneous landscapes: how to evaluate total impact. Oikos 54: 117–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, W.W., and J. Pickering. 1992. Pseudoreplication: a sine qua non for regional ecology. Landscape Ecology 6: 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S.J., E.K. Bollinger, and G.W. Barrett. 1993. Effects of habitat patch shape on population dynamics of meadow voles (Microtuspennsylvanicus). Journal of Mammalogy 74: 1045–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S. 1995. Metapopulations and conservation. Pages 111–128 in P.J. Edwards, R.M. May, and N.R. Webb, editors. Large-scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell Science Publications, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ims, R.A., J. Rolstad, and P. Wegge. 1993. Predicting space use responses to habitat fragmentation: can voles (Microtus oeconomous) serve as an experimental model system (EMS) for capercaillie grouse, Tetro unrogallus, in boreal forests? Conservation Biology 63: 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E.N. 1990. Effects of forage availability on home range and population density of Microtuspennsylvanicus. Journal of Mammalogy 71: 382–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P. 1983. Influence of vegetation texture on herbivore populations: resource concentration and herbivore movement. Pages 259–289 in R.F. Denno and M.S. McClure, editors. Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P. 1987. Habitat fragmentation and the stability of predator-prey interactions. Nature 321: 388–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P. 1989. Reviewing the dialogue between theory and experiments in population ecology. Pages 68–88 in J. Roughgarden, R.M. May, and S.A. Levin, editors. Perspectives in ecological theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P., and U. Wennergren. 1995. Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373: 299–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotliar, N.B. and J.A. Wiens. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59: 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1988. Demographic models of the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) Oecologia 75: 601–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W.Z. 1985. Dispersal. Pages 420–454 in R.H. Tamerin, editor. Biology of New World Microtus. American Society of Mammalogists Special Publication No. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W.Z., Jr. (editor). 1995. Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology. University of Minnesota Press, Mineapolis, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkens, G.E., and S.H. Anderson. 1988. Estimation of small mammal population size. Ecology 69: 1952–1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, D.D., K.E. Freas, and S.B. Weiss. 1990. An environment-metapopulation approach to the conservation of an endangered invertebrate. Conservation Biology 4: 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R.F. 1991. Landscape connectivity: different functions at different scales. Pages 27–39 in W.E. Hudson, editor. Landscape linkages and biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum., E.P. 1984. The mesocosm. Bioscience 34: 558–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R.V. 1989. Perspectives in hierarchy and scale. Pages 140–156 in J. Roughgarden, R.M. May, and S.A. Levin, editors. Perspectives in ecological theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R.V., D.L. DeAngelis, J.B. Waide, and T.A. Allen. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld, R.S., S.R. Pugh, J.O. Seamon, and R.H. Tamarin. 1988. Space use and reproductive success in a population of meadow voles. Journal of Animal Ecology 57: 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., and M.L. Cadenasso. 1995. Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269: 331–334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. American Naturalist 137: S50 - S66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J., C.L. Wolin, and M.L. Judge. 1989. An experimental analysis of patch size, habitat subdivision, and extinction in a marine intertidal snail. Conservation Biology 3: 242–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G.R., R.D. Holt, M.S. Gaines, S.P. Hamburg, M.L. Johnson, H.S. Fitch, and E.A. Martinke. 1992. Diverse and contrasting effects of habitat fragmentation. Science 257: 524–526.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ronsenzweig, M.L. 1991. Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism. American Naturalist 137: S5 - S28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root, R. 1973. Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards, Brassica oleracea. Ecological Monographs 43: 95–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D.A., R.J. Hobbs, and C.R. Margules. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5: 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. 1988. The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 473–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skalski, J.R., and D.S. Robson. 1992. Techniques for wildlife investigations: design and analyses of capture data. Academic Press, San Diego, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.T., and J.M. Vrieze. 1979. Population structure of everglade rodents: responses to a patchy environment. Journal of Mammalogy 60: 778–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps, J.A., M. Buechner, and V.V. Krishnan. 1987. The effects of edge geometry on territorial defense costs: intruder pressure in bounded habitats. American Zoologist 27: 307–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth, N.C., and L. Hansson. 1981. The importance of population dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes: management of vertebrate pests and some other animals. Agro-Ecosystems 7: 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telleria, J.L., T. Santos, and M. Alcantara. 1991. Abundance and food-searching intensity of wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) in fragmented forests. Journal of Mammalogy 72: 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., R.M. May, C.L. Lehman, and M.A. Nowak. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371: 65–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, R.R. 1984. The effect of dispersal on population stability in one-species discrete-space population growth models. American Naturalist 123: 230–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verboom, J.A., A. Schotman, P. Opdam, and J.A.J. Metz. 1991. European nuthatch populations in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Oikos 61: 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. 1995. Landscape mosaics and ecological theory. Pages 1–26 in L. Hansson, L. Fahrig and G. Merriam, editors. Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes. Chapman and Hall, London, United Kingdom.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A., N.C. Stenseth, B. Van Home, and R.A. Ims. 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D.S., C.H. McLellan, and A.P. Dobson. 1986. Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. Pages 237–256 in M.E. Soulé, editor. Conservation biology: science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowers, M.A., Dooley, J.L. (1999). EMS Studies at the Individual, Patch, and Landscape Scale: Designing Landscapes to Measure Scale-Specific Responses to Habitat Fragmentation. In: Barrett, G.W., Peles, J.D. (eds) Landscape Ecology of Small Mammals. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21622-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21622-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5640-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21622-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics