Demographic Parameter Estimation for Experimental Landscape Studies on Small Mammal Populations

  • James D. Nichols
  • Cynthia J. Coffman


Investigations of population-dynamic effects of landscape attributes are directed at inferences about animal abundance and/or density. We are typically interested in variation in animal numbers over time and space and in the degree to which such variation is caused or influenced by characteristics of the landscape. Animal abundance is determined by rates of survival, reproduction, and movement. Variation in abundance over time and space is a function of these rate parameters. Population-dynamic studies of small mammals will usually require estimates of animal abundance and of these demographic rate parameters. Populations of small mammals are amenable to experimental study, permitting much stronger inference about causation than observational studies based on correlation and association (e.g., Hurlbert 1984, Skalski and Robson 1992). The ability to conduct manipulative experiments, however, does not reduce the need for good estimates of the response variables about which inferences are sought.


Robust Design Capture Probability Multi State Model Movement Probability Capture History 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Pages 267–281 in B.N. Petran and F. Csaki, editors. International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
  2. Andrzejewski, R., and T. Wierzbowska. 1961. An attempt at assessing the duration of residence of small rodents in a defined forest area and the rate of interchange between individuals. Acta Theriologica 5: 153–172.Google Scholar
  3. Amason, A.N. 1972. Parameter estimates from mark-recapture experiments on two popula-tions subject to migration and death. Researches in Population Ecology 13: 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aranson, A.N. 1973. The estimation of population size, migration rates and survival in a stratified population. Researches in Population Ecology 15: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, R.J. 1995. Open population mark-recapture models including ancillary sightings. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  6. Boyce, M.S. 1992. Population viability analysis. Annual Review of Ecology and Sys- tematics 23: 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brownie, C., J.E. Hines, J.D. Nichols, K.H. Pollock, and J.B. Hestbeck. 1993. Capture-recapture studies for multiple strata including non-Markovian transition probabilities. Biometrics 49: 1173–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brownie, C., and D.S. Robson. 1983. Estimation of time-specific survival rates from tag-resighting samples: a generalization of the Jolly-Seber model. Biometrics 39: 437–453.Google Scholar
  9. Bunck, C.M., and K.H. Pollock. 1993. Estimating survival of radio-tagged birds. Pages 51–63 in J.-D. Lebreton and P.M. North, editors. Marked individuals in the study of bird populations. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  10. Burnham, K.P. 1993. A theory for combined analysis of ring recovery and recapture data. Pages 199–213 in J.-D. Lebreton and P.M. North, editors. Marked individuals in the study of bird populations. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  11. Burnham, K.P., and D.R. Anderson. 1992. Data-based selection of an appropriate biological model: the key to modern data analysis. Pages 16–30 in D.R. McCullough and R.H. Barrett, editors. Wildlife 2001: populations. Elsevier, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burnham, K.P., D.R. Anderson, G.C. White, C. Brownie, and K.H. Pollock. 1987. Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture. American Fisheries Society Monographs 5.Google Scholar
  13. Carothers, A.D. 1973. The effect of unequal catchability on Jolly-Seber estimates. Biometrics 29: 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carothers, A.D. 1979. Quantifying unequal catchability and its effect on survival estimates in an actual population. Journal of Animal Ecology 48: 863–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chao, A., S.M. Lee, and S.L. Jeng. 1992. Estimation of population size for capture-recapture data when capture probabilities vary by time and individual animal. Biometrics 48: 201–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coffman, C.J. 1997. The effects of corridor-linked patches on metapopulation dynamics: a field experiment with Microtus pennsylvanicus. Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  17. Connell, J.H., and W.P. Sousa. 1983. On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence. American Naturalist 121: 789–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Conroy, M.J. 1993. Testing hypotheses about the relationship of habitat to animal survivorship. Pages 331–342 in J.-D. Lebreton and P.M. North, editors. Marked individuals in the study of bird populations. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  19. Conroy, M.J., J.E. Anderson, S.L. Rathbun, and D.G. Krementz. 1996. Statistical inference on patch-specific survival and movement rates from marked animals. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 3: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cox, D.R. 1972. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34: 187–220.Google Scholar
  21. Heisey, D.M., and T.K. Fuller. 1985. Evaluation of survival and cause-specific mortal-ity rates using telemetry data. Journal of Wildlife Management 49: 668–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hestbeck, J.B., J.D. Nichols, and R.A. Malecki. 1991. Estimates of movement and site fidelity using mark-resight data of wintering Canada Geese. Ecology 72: 523–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hines, J.E. 1994. MSSURVIV user’s manual. Patuxent Environmental Science Center, Laurel, Maryland.Google Scholar
  24. Hurlbert, S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ims, R.A., and N.G. Yoccoz. 1997. Studying transfer processes in metapopulations: emigration, migration, and colonization. Pages 247–265 in I. Hanski and M.E. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jolly, G.M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika 52: 225–247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jolly, G.M., and J.M. Dickson. 1983. The problem of unequal catchability in mark-recapture estimation of small mammal population. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61: 922–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kendall, W.K., and J.D. Nichols. 1995. On the use of secondary capture-recapture samples to estimate temporary emigration and breeding proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics 22: 751–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kendall, W.L., J.D. Nichols, and J.E. Hines. 1997. Estimating temporary emigration using capture-recapture data with Pollock’s robust design. Ecology 78: 563–578.Google Scholar
  30. Kendall, W.L., and K.H. Pollock. 1992. The robust design in capture-recapture studies: a review and evaluation by Monte Carlo simulation. Pages 31–43 in D.R. McCullough and R.H. Barrett, editors. Wildlife 2001: populations. Elsevier, New York, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kendall, W.L., K.H. Pollock, and C. Brownie. 1995. A likelihood-based approach to capture-recapture estimation of demographic parameters under the robust design. Biometrics 51: 293–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kozakiewicz, M. 1993. Habitat isolation and ecological barriers-the effect on small mammal populations and communities. Acta Theriologica 38: 1–30.Google Scholar
  33. Krebs, C.J., B.L. Keller, and R.H. Tamarin. 1969. Mictrotus population biology: demographic changes in fluctuating populations of M. ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus in southern Indiana. Ecology 50: 587–607.Google Scholar
  34. Lebreton, J.-D., K.P. Burnham, J. Clobert, and D.R. Anderson. 1992. Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62: 67–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, S.-M., and A. Chao. 1994. Estimating population size via sample coverage for closed capture-recapture models. Biometrics 50: 88–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Link, W.A., and J.D. Nichols. 1994. On the importance of sampling variance to inves- tigations of temporal variation in animal population size. Oikos 69: 539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Menkens, G.E., Jr., and S.H. Anderson. 1988. Estimation of small-mammal population size. Ecology 69: 1952–1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nichols, J.D. 1986. On the use of enumeration estimators for interspecific comparisons, with comments on a “trappability” estimator. Journal of Mammalogy 67: 590–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nichols, J.D. 1992. Capture-recapture models. BioScience 42: 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nichols, J.D. 1996. Sources of variation in migratory movements of animal populations: statistical inference and a selective review of empirical results for birds. Pages 147–197 in O.E. Rhodes, Jr., R.K. Chesser and M.H. Smith, editors. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  41. Nichols, J.D., and W.L. Kendall. 1995. The use of multi-state capture-recapture models to address questions in evolutionary ecology. Journal of Applied Statistics 22: 835846.Google Scholar
  42. Nichols, J.D., and K.H. Pollock. 1983. Estimation methodology in contemporary small mammal capture-recapture studies. Journal of Mammalogy 64: 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nichols, J.D., and K.H. Pollock. 1990. Estimation of recruitment from immigration versus in situ reproduction using Pollock’s robust design. Ecology 71: 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nichols, J.D., J.E. Hines, and K.H. Pollock. 1984a. Effects of permanent trap response in capture probability on Jolly-Seber capture-recapture model estimates. Journal of Wildlife Management 48: 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nichols, J.D., K.H. Pollock, and J.E. Hines. 1984b. The use of a robust capture-recapture design in small mammal population studies: a field example with Microtus pennsylvanicus. Acta Theriologica 29: 357–365.Google Scholar
  46. Nichols, J.D., J.R. Sauer, K.H. Pollock, and J.B. Hestbeck. 1992. Estimating transition probabilities for stage-based population projection matrices using capture-recapture data. Ecology 73: 306–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nichols, J.D., C. Brownie, J.E. Hines, K.H. Pollock, and J.B. Hestbeck. 1993. The estimation of exchanges among populations or subpopulations. Pages 265–279 in J.-D. Lebreton and P.M. North, editors. Marked individuals in the study of bird populations. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  48. Nichols, J.D., J.E. Hines, K.H. Pollock, R.L. Hinz, and W.A. Link. 1994. Estimating breeding proportions and testing hypotheses about costs of reproduction with capture-recapture data. Ecology 75: 2052–2065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Otis, D.L., K.P. Burnham, G.C. White, and D.R. Anderson. 1978. Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs No. 62.Google Scholar
  50. Paradis, E., G. Guedon, and R. Pradel. 1993. Estimation of sex-and age-related sur- vival rates in a microtine population. Journal of Wildlife Management 57: 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pimm, S.L., and A. Redfearn. 1988. The variability of population densities. Nature 334: 613–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pollock, K.H. 1975. A K-sample tag-recapture model allowing for unequal survival and catchability. Biometrika 62: 577–583.Google Scholar
  53. Pollock, K.H. 1982. A capture-recapture sampling design robust to unequal catchability. Journal of Wildlife Management 46: 752–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pollock, K.H., C.M. Bunck, S.R. Winterstein, and C.L. Chen. 1995. A capture-recapture survival analysis model for radio-tagged animals. Journal of Applied Statistics 22: 661–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pollock, K.H., J.D. Nichols, C. Brownie, and J.E. Hines. 1990. Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs, No. 107.Google Scholar
  56. Pollock, K.H., S.R. Winterstein, C.M. Bunck, and P.D. Curtis. 1989a. Survival analysis in telemetry studies: the staggered entry design. Journal of Wildlife Management 53: 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pollock, K.H., S.R. Winterstein, and M.J. Conroy. 1989b. Estimation and analysis of survival distributions for radio-tagged animals. Biometrics 45: 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pradel, R., J.E. Hines, J.-D. Lebreton, and J.D. Nichols. 1997. Capture-recapture survival models taking account of transients. Biometrics 53: 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reddingius, J., and P.J. den Boer. 1970. Simulation experiments illustrating stabilization of animal numbers by spreading of risk. Oecologica 5: 240–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rexstad, E., and K.P. Burnham. 1991. User’s guide for interactive program CAPTURE. Abundance estimation of closed animal populations. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
  61. Roff, D.A. 1974. The analysis of a population model demonstrating the importance of dispersal in a heterogeneous environment. Oecologia 15: 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Samuel, M.D., and M.R. Fuller. 1994. Wildlife radiotelemetry. Pages 370–418 in T.A. Bookhout, editor. Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitat. Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
  63. Schwarz, C.J., and W.T. Stobo. 1997. Estimating temporary migration using the robust design. Biometrics 53: 178–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Seber, G.A.F. 1965. A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika 52:249–259. Seber, G.A.F. 1982. Estimation of animal abundance and related parameters, 2nd edition. Macmillan, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  65. Skalski, J.R., and D.S. Robson. 1992. Techniques for wildlife investigations: design and analysis of capture data. Academic Press, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  66. Slade, N.A. 1991. Loss of body mass associated with capture of Sigmodon and Micro-tus from northeastern Kansas. Journal of Mammalogy 72: 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Slade, N.A., and C. Iskjaer. 1990. Daily variation in body mass of free-living rodents and its significance for mass-based population dynamics. Journal of Mammalogy 71: 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Spendelow, J.A., J.D. Nichols, I.C.T. Nisbet, H. Hays, G.D. Cormons, J. Burger, C. Satina, J.E. Hines, and M. Gochfeld. 1995. Estimating annual survival and movement rates of adults within a metapopulation of roseate terns. Ecology 76: 24152428.Google Scholar
  69. Steen, H. 1995. Untangling the causes of disappearance from a local population of root voles, Microtus oeconomus: a test of the regional synchrony hypothesis. Oikos 73: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. White, G.C., D.R. Anderson, K.P, Burnham, and D.L. Otis. 1982. Capture-recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-8787-NERP, Los Alamos, New Mexico.Google Scholar
  71. White, G.C., R.A. Garrott. 1990. Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  72. Wierzbowska, T., and K. Petrusewicz. 1963. Residency and rate of disappearance of two free-living populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus L.). Ekologica Polska A11: 557–572.Google Scholar
  73. Yoccoz, N.G., H. Steen, R.A. Ims, and N.C. Stenseth. 1993. Estimating demographic parameters and the population size: an updated methodological survey. Pages 565587 in N.C. Stenseth and R.A. Ims, editors. The biology of lemmings. Academic Press, New York, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • James D. Nichols
  • Cynthia J. Coffman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations