Skip to main content

Video Games, Learning, and “Content”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Games: Purpose and Potential in Education

Abstract

In this paper, I argue both that good video games recruit good leaming and that game design is inherently connected to designing good leaming for players. Good game design has a lot to teach us about good leaming and contemporary leaming theory has something to teach us about how to design even better and deeper games. I view leaming in games as a form of “experiential leaming” and discuss the conditions—often met in good games—under which leaming from experience is most effective for leaming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999a). Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation for situated action. Discourse Processes 28: 61-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999b). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577-660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R., (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Dugid (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18: 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 13: 145–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S. & Sejnowski, T. J. (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1993). Associative engines: Connectionism, concepts, and representational change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction 22: 293–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1992). The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. New York: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1996) Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses. London: Taylor & Francis (First Edition, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A Critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2005). Why video games are good for your soul: Pleasure and learning. Melbourne: Common Ground.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What is memory for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 96: 424–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M. & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes 28: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. (2005). On intelligence. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance during Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist 41: 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: A view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist 52: 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L. (2006). Case-based reasoning. In R. K. Sawyer Ed., The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity 3: 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E., Gonzales, P. & Jacoby, S. (1996). “When I come down I’m in the domain state.” In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson, Eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 328–369.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K., Ed. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W. (2007). How computer games help children learn. New York: Palgrave/ Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L. & Heiser, J. (2006). Spatial representations and imagery in learning. In R. K. Sawyer Ed., The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 283-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high-energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Paul Gee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gee, J.P. (2009). Video Games, Learning, and “Content”. In: Miller, C. (eds) Games: Purpose and Potential in Education. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09775-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics