Possibilities and Challenges of Transition to Ambulant Health Service Delivery with ICT Support in Psychiatry

  • Synnøve Thomassen Andersen
  • Margunn Aanestad
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 267)


Transformations of established institutional orders are to be expected along-side the appearance of novel ICT-enabled models of service delivery. Such transformations are neither simple nor short-term, but involve complex and fundamental changes in normative, regulative, and technical aspects. In this paper we describe the initial stages of a project redesigning psychiatric services for children and adolescents. New collaboration models, supported by new ICT applications, were introduced into the ordinary structures of health care services in Finnmark, the northernmost county of Norway. Our aim is to contribute to the understanding of how the preexisting technical and organizational systems and models, the installed base, impact radical change. We address the potential for user-driven innovations, and focus our analysis on the quality of generativity in the existing information infrastructure. The salient challenges in our case were related to the existing technical information infrastructure in the health sector. The new solution was pushed outside the established information infrastructure. While this may be only a temporary situation, we argue that, as a result of this process, the new solution emerged with a greater potential for future generativity than it would have had it been more linked to the existing information infrastructure.


Health care psychiatry mobile technologies installed base generativity 


  1. Abbate, J. 1994. “The Internet Challenge: Conflict and Compromise in Computer Networking,” In Changing Large Technical Systems, J. Summerton (ed.), Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 193-210.Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, W. B. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events,” The Economic Journal (99:394), pp. 116-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball M. J, and Lillis J. 2001. “E-Health: Transforming the Physician/Patient Relationship,” International Journal of Medical Informatics (61:1), pp. 1-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, P., and Safran, C. 2003. “Report of Conference Track 3: Patient Empowerment,” International Journal of Medical Informatics (69, 301-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baskerville, R. 1999. “Investigating Information Systems with Action Research,” Communications of the AIS (2:19), pp. 1-32.Google Scholar
  6. Ciborra, C. 1994. “The Grassroots of IT and Strategy,” In Strategic Information Systems: A European Perspective, C. Ciborra and T. Jelassi (eds.), Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 3-24.Google Scholar
  7. Checkland, P. 1991. “From Framework through Experience to Learning: The Essential Nature of Action Research,” In Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. A. Hirschheim (eds.), Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 397-403.Google Scholar
  8. David, P. A. 2005. “The Beginnings and Prospective Ending of ‘End-to-End’: An Evolutionary Perspective on the Internet’s Architecture,” Industrial Organization from Economics Working Paper Archive (EconWPA) ( Hanseth, O., and Aanestad, M. 2003: “Design as Bootstrapping: On the Evolution of ICT
  9. Networks in Health Care,” Methods of Information in Medicine 42:(4), 384-391.Google Scholar
  10. Hanseth, O., Ciborra, C., and Braa, K. 2001. “The Control Devolution: ERP and the Side Effects of Globalization,” SIGMIS Database (32:4), pp. 34-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanseth, O., and Lyytinen, K. 2004. “Theorizing about the Design of Information Infrastructures: Design Kernel Theories and Principles,” Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments, Systems and Organizations (4:4), pp. 207-241.Google Scholar
  12. Hughes, T. P. 1983.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880-1930, Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lanzara, G. F. 2008. “Mapping the Encounter Between ICT and Institutions: The Emergence of Techno-Institutional Assemblages,” In ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector: European Perspectives on the Making of e-Government, F. Contini and G. F. Lanzara (eds.), Basingstoke, England: Palgrave MacMillan (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  14. Monteiro, E. 1998. “Scaling Information Infrastructure: The Case of the Next Generation IP in the Internet,” The Information Society (14:3), pp. 229-245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Monteiro, E., and Hanseth, O. 1995. “Social Shaping of Information Infrastructure: On Being Specific about the Technology,” In Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work, W. J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 325-343.Google Scholar
  16. Nielsen, P. 2006. Conceptual Framework of Information Infrastructure Building: A Case Study of the Development of a Content Service Platform for Mobile Phones in Norway, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  17. Sassen, S. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Star, S. L., and Ruhleder, K 1996. “Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces,” Information Systems Research (17:1), pp. 111-134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sussman, G. L., and Evered, R. D. 1978. “An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research,” Administrative Sciences Quarterly (23, 582-603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zittrain, J. 2006. “The Generative Internet,” Harward Law Review (119:7), May , pp. 1974-2040 (

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Synnøve Thomassen Andersen
    • 1
  • Margunn Aanestad
    • 2
  1. 1.Finnmark University CollegeAltaNorway
  2. 2.University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations